›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9): 1622-1627.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中膨胀土CMA改性室内试验研究

余 颂,陈善雄,许锡昌,余 飞   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-24 出版日期:2006-09-11 发布日期:2013-11-28
  • 作者简介:余颂,男,1981年生,硕士研究生,主要从事非饱和土工程性质的研究

Laboratory test study on CMA-treated expansive soils

YU Song, CHEN Shan-xiong, XU Xi-chang, YU Fei   

  1. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2005-06-24 Online:2006-09-11 Published:2013-11-28

摘要: CMA是一种新型膨胀土生态改性剂,依托合(肥)-六(安)-叶(集)高速公路工程,对CMA改性后中膨胀土的基本物理性质、击实特性、胀缩特性、力学特性等进行了3种配方的室内对比试验研究。结果表明,中膨胀土经CMA改性后,其自由膨胀率由改性前的71 %下降到20 %左右,液限和塑性指数也显著降低,亲水能力大幅度下降;胶粒含量明显下降,粉粒含量增加,说明改性后粒度组成已接近粉土;各项胀缩性指标较改性前也有大幅度下降,无荷膨胀率约为改性前的2 %,膨胀力约为改性前的5 %;改性土的CBR值可达50 %,浸水变形不到1 %;在非饱水和饱水状态下,改性土都具有较高的抗剪强度和无侧限抗压强度,说明改性后其水稳定性较好。经对比分析,认为1#配方改性效果最好,较适用于合肥膨胀土的改性处理。

关键词: 中膨胀土, CMA, 改性剂, 配方

Abstract: As a kind of new ecological modifier, CMA has good application prospect. Based on Hefei-Luan-Yeji Expressway Project, laboratory comparative tests on basic physical, compacted, swelling-shrinkage and mechanical characteristics of CMA-treated expansive soils have been carried out. Compared with unmodified sample, the free swelling ratio of the modified samples lowers from 71 % to about 20 %; its liquid limit and plastic index also decrease obviously; hydrophilic nature falls down by a wide range as well as micelle content, but silt content increases sharply. The results also indicate that index for swelling-shrinkage property has reduced, swelling ratio without load is 2 %-3 % and swelling power is 5 % of those without modifying. The value of CBR reaches 50 % and deformation is small when soaked; soils have a high shear strength and unconfined compressive strength whether saturated or not, and possess better water stability. Conclusion can be drawn that CMA can change the properties of expansive soils notably and the first formula is suitable for Hefei expansive soils for its good treating effect.

Key words: middle expansive soils, CMA, ecological modifier, formula

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 郭万里, 朱俊高, 钱 彬, 张 丹, . 粗粒土的颗粒破碎演化模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1023-1029.
[2] 郭万里,朱俊高,余 挺,金 伟,. 土的连续级配方程在粗粒料中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3661-3667.
[3] 朱 伟 ,姬凤玲 ,李明东 ,马殿光 ,汤 峻 . 轻质土密度、强度与材料组成的关系研究[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1411-1414.
[4] 虞海珍,李小青,姚建伟,. 膨胀土化学改良试验研究分析[J]. , 2006, 27(11): 1941-1944.
[5] 陈文胜,黄生文,刘 辉,张 军. 岩土工程计算分析的力分配方法[J]. , 2005, 26(3): 409-414.
[6] 张小平 ,刘艳华 ,张小蒙 ,包承纲, . 泡沫轻质材料试验研究的均匀设计方法及配方优化[J]. , 2004, 25(8): 1323-1326.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周爱军,栗 冰. CFG桩复合地基褥垫层的试验研究和有限元分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1803 -1808 .
[2] 陈 宇,张庆贺,朱继文,姚海明. 双圆盾构穿越下立交结构的流-固耦合数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1950 -1955 .
[3] 丁文其,袁森林,高小庆,谢东武. 电力隧道超大直径顶管施工扰动特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2901 -2906 .
[4] 高树生,钱根宝,王 彬,杨作明,刘华勋. 新疆火山岩双重介质气藏供排气机理数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 276 -280 .
[5] 吕玺琳,黄茂松,钱建固. 真三轴状态下砂土的强度参数[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 981 -984 .
[6] 鲁 涛,王孔伟,李建林. 库水压力作用下砂岩破坏形式的探究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413 -0418 .
[7] 张 磊 ,龚晓南 ,俞建霖. 考虑土体屈服的纵横荷载单桩变形内力分析[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2441 -2445 .
[8] 魏明尧,王恩元,刘晓斐,王 超. 深部煤层卸压爆破防治冲击地压效果的数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2539 -2543 .
[9] 陈亿军 ,薛 强 ,孙可明 ,赵 颖 ,万 勇 . 土质陡坡降雨侵蚀的数学模型及求解方法[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1579 -1584 .
[10] 黄茂松 ,李 波 . 往复荷载下层状地基柔性筏板-群桩共同作用分析[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2388 -2394 .