膨胀土化学改良试验研究分析

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 1941-1944.

膨胀土化学改良试验研究分析

虞海珍¹，李小青¹，姚建伟²

1.华中科技大学土木工程与力学学院，武汉 430074；2.铁道第四勘察设计院，武汉 430063

收稿日期:2006-01-25 出版日期:2006-11-10 发布日期:2013-12-04
作者简介:虞海珍，女，1973年生，博士研究生，讲师，主要从事道路工程、岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作

Experimental study and analysis of expansive soil improved with chemical medicine

YU Hai-zhen¹, LI Xiao-qing¹, YAO Jian-wei²

1.College of Civil Engineering & Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; 2.The Fourth Railway Investigation & Design Institute, Wuhan 430063, China

Received:2006-01-25 Online:2006-11-10 Published:2013-12-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 膨胀土的改良是膨胀土工程地基处理研究领域中的重要课题之一，已受到岩土科学工作者和工程师的普遍关注。结合某公路膨胀土边坡防护工程，采用ESR生态改性剂进行膨胀土化学改良试验研究，探讨了膨胀土的化学改良机理和效果。结果表明，膨胀土经化学改性为非膨胀土，且由原来的亲水性变成憎水性，能达到较好的水稳定性，尤其是地表浅部的改性土能达到长期浸泡无崩解的效果。改性后的土体具有砂土的特征，各项强度指标大幅度提高，地基承载力有着明显的提高，并随着ESR生态改性剂喷洒次数的增加，其承载力逐步增大，在短时间内达到稳定值，最佳喷洒次数为3～4次。

关键词: 膨胀土, 化学改良, ESR生态改性剂, 试验研究

Abstract: The improvement of expansive soil is an important lesson in the study of expansive soil subgrade treatment; so it has been concerned by the geotechnical researchers and engineers. Combined with slope treatment project of expansive soil on a highway, the chemical improving expansive soil by experiment with ESR ecotypic medicine is studied. Both of the mechanism and the effectiveness of improving expansive soil are analysed. It is discovered that the expansive soil become non-expansive after chemical treatment. The improved expansive soil has been changed from hydrophilicity to hydrophobicity and has good water stability. While the soil has the characteristic of sand and every strength index is largely increased. The foundation bearing capacity is also increased by the number of spraying; and the best spraying number is 3－4.

Key words: expansive soil, chemical improvement, ESR ecotypic medicine, experimental study

中图分类号:

TU 411

虞海珍，李小青，姚建伟，. 膨胀土化学改良试验研究分析[J]. , 2006, 27(11): 1941-1944.

YU Hai-zhen, LI Xiao-qing, YAO Jian-wei，. Experimental study and analysis of expansive soil improved with chemical medicine[J]. , 2006, 27(11): 1941-1944.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[2]	郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[3]	庄心善, 王俊翔, 王康, 李凯, 胡智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[4]	刘钟, 张楚福, 张义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.
[5]	李国维, 施赛杰, 侯宇宙, 吴建涛, 李峰, 吴少甫, . 引江济淮试验工程非膨胀土开发技术实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 302-314.
[6]	胡东旭，李贤，周超云，薛乐，刘洪伏，汪时机. 膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 318-324.
[7]	尹君凡，雷勇，陈秋南，刘一新，邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[8]	杨和平，唐咸远，王兴正，肖杰，倪啸，. 有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2311-2317.
[9]	张春晓，肖宏彬，包嘉邈，尹亚虎，尹铎霖. 膨胀土应力松弛的分数阶模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1747-1752.
[10]	毛新，汪时机, 程明书，陈正汉，王晓琪，. 膨胀土初始破损与湿干交替耦合作用下的力学行为[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 571-579.
[11]	姚传芹，韦昌富，马田田，陈合龙，陈火东，. 孔隙溶液对膨胀土力学性质影响[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 116-122.
[12]	刘泉声, 雷广峰, 彭星新, 魏莱, 刘建平, 潘玉丛,. 锚杆锚固对节理岩体剪切性能影响试验研究及机制分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 27-35.
[13]	鲜少华，许英姿，姚海林，卢正，李志勇，董城,. 锚固加强植被系统约束膨胀土变形模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 158-166.
[14]	池泽成，陈善雄，周哲，戴张俊，宋瑞军, . 合肥重塑膨胀土三向膨胀力试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 381-386.
[15]	许年春，吴同情，冯桥木，汪魁，邵伟峰，. 土变形模量的柔性承载板测试研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 496-700.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed