K0固结粗粒土剪胀特性大型三轴试验研究

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 3431-3436.

K0固结粗粒土剪胀特性大型三轴试验研究

褚福永^{1, 2}，朱俊高³，殷建华⁴

1.丽水学院土木工程学系，浙江丽水 323000；2.重庆交通大学水利水运工程教育部重点实验室，重庆 400074； 3.河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室，南京 210098；4.香港理工大学土木及环境工程学系，香港

收稿日期:2013-06-21 出版日期:2013-12-10 发布日期:2013-12-19
作者简介:禇福永，男，1976年生，博士，讲师，主要从事土体基本特性及本构关系方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
重庆交通大学水利水运工程教育部重点实验室暨国家内河航道整治工程技术研究中心开放基金资助（No. SLK2012B03）；住房和城乡建设部2013年科技计划项目（No. 2013-K3-27）；高等学校学科创新引智计划（No. B13024）；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金（No. 20110094110002）。

Study of shear dilatancy behaviors of coarse-grained soil in large-scale triaxial tests under K0-consolidation condition

CHU Fu-yong^{1, 2}, ZHU Jun-gao³, YIN Jian-hua⁴

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Lishui University, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Water-way Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

Received:2013-06-21 Online:2013-12-10 Published:2013-12-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用大型三轴剪切仪对不同相对密度的双江口心墙坝覆盖层料，进行了固结及各向等压固结条件下的排水剪切试验，探讨了固结及各向等压固结条件下粗粒土剪胀性的差异，并检验了修正Rowe剪胀方程对固结粗粒土的适用性。结果表明：粗粒土在固结条件下，较各向等压固结条件下的剪胀性明显，且这种差异性在密度较小的粗粒料中体现较为突出，而随着密度的增加，差异性逐渐减弱；对试验数据进行非线性拟合,总结出剪胀因子与相对密度、围压之间的关系式，据此可分析不同紧密程度粗粒料剪胀性的强弱；对固结粗粒土，修正Rowe剪胀方程能较好地描述其剪胀性。

关键词: 固结, 大三轴, 剪胀, 粗粒土

Abstract: Using large-scale shearing device, consolidation-drained triaxial test and isotropic consolidation-drained triaxial test under different confining pressures are performed for three relative densities (0.9, 0.8, 0.7) overburden material of ShuangJiangKou earth dam. The difference between dilatancy behaviours of coarse-grained soil under -consolidation and isotropic consolidation is investigated. Meanwhile, applicability of the modified Rowe dilatancy equation for coarse-grained soils under -consolidation is tested. The test results show that the dilatancy under -consolidation is more remarkable than that under isotropic consolidation; and this difference is more obvious for coarse-grained soils with lower density. By means of the nonlinear fitting of the results of triaxial tests, a relationship formula for coarse-grained soils under -consolidation and isotropic consolidation among dilatancy factor and relative density and confining pressure is obtained, according to which, the dilatancy’ strength of coarse-grained soil under different consolidations can be judged. For the coarse-grained materials under -consolidation, of which dilatancy characteristics can be reflected well by the modified Rowe dilatancy equation.

Key words: -consolidation condition, large-scale triaxial test, dilatancy, coarse grained soil

中图分类号:

TU 411.5

褚福永，朱俊高，殷建华,. K0固结粗粒土剪胀特性大型三轴试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3431-3436.

CHU Fu-yong , ZHU Jun-gao , YIN Jian-hua,. Study of shear dilatancy behaviors of coarse-grained soil in large-scale triaxial tests under K0-consolidation condition[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3431-3436.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[2]	蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[3]	涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[4]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[5]	张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[6]	张雷, 王宁伟, 景立平, 方晨, 董瑞, . 电渗排水固结中电极材料的对比试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3493-3501.
[7]	张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[8]	邱金伟, 蒲诃夫, 陈训龙, 吕伟东, 李磊. 污染泥堆场处置中自重固结与污染物迁移的耦合分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3090-3098.
[9]	张治国, 黄茂松, 杨轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[10]	刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[11]	李称, 吴文兵, 梅国雄, 宗梦繁, 梁荣柱, . 不同排水条件下城市固废一维降解固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3071-3080.
[12]	刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[13]	杨德欢, 颜荣涛, 韦昌富, 潘雪瑛, 张芹, . 饱和黏土平均粒间应力的确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2075-2084.
[14]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[15]	李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed