›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 1345-1348.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    

关于强度折减有限元方法中边坡失稳判据的讨论

刘金龙1,栾茂田1~3,赵少飞3, 4,袁凡凡1,王吉利1   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,武汉 430071;2.大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,大连 116024; 3.大连理工大学 土木水利学院岩土工程研究所,大连 116024;4.山东科技大学 土木建筑学院,青岛 266510
  • 收稿日期:2005-04-05 出版日期:2005-08-10 发布日期:2013-12-26
  • 作者简介:刘金龙,男,1979年生,博士研究生,主要从事土动力学理论与实验,土工数值计算与分析等方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所前沿领域基础研究基金资助项目(No.Q110305)。

Discussion on criteria for evaluating stability of slope in elastoplastic FEM based on shear strength reduction technique

LIU Jin-long1, LUAN Mao-tian1~3, ZHAO Shao-fei3, 4, YUAN Fan-fan1, WANG Ji-li1   

  1. 1. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 3. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266510, China
  • Received:2005-04-05 Online:2005-08-10 Published:2013-12-26

摘要: 在边坡稳定性分析中采用强度折减弹塑性有限元方法时,所得到的总体安全系数在一定程度上依赖于所采用的失稳评判标准,通常以数值计算的收敛性作为边坡失稳判据。而有限元计算的数值收敛性受多种因素的影响,因而由此所得到的安全系数的合理性及其唯一性受到了质疑。为了考查目前各种失稳判据的合理性及其适用性,分别依据计算的收敛性、特征部位位移的突变性和塑性区的贯通性等3个失稳判据,针对某一典型边坡算例,采用强度折减弹塑性有限元方法进行稳定性分析,并与Spencer极限平衡法所得到的总体安全系数进行了对比。对比分析表明,以有限元数值计算的收敛性作为失稳判据在某些情况下所得到的安全系数可能误差较大,而采用特征部位位移的突变性或塑性区的贯通性作为失稳判据所得到的边坡安全系数与Spencer极限平衡法的计算结果比较接近,考虑到实用性与简便性,建议在边坡稳定性分析的强度折减有限元方法中联合采用特征部位位移的突变性和塑性区的贯通性作为边坡的失稳判据。

关键词: 强度折减法, 边坡稳定分析, 失稳判据, 安全系数

Abstract: While the elastoplastic finite element method based on the shear strength reduction (SSR) technique is employed to analyze slope stability, the overall factor of safety computed numerically is, in a certain degree, dependent on the criteria used for evaluating critical instability condition of slope. As usual, the convergence of the numerical computation of elastoplastic FEM is commonly employed in conventional studies. In fact, the convergence of the nonlinear analysis of elastoplastic FEM is controlled by a number of factors. Therefore the rationality and uniqueness of the numerical solution of the safety factor are in doubt. In order to examine the reasonability and applicability of various criteria including the convergence of numerical computations, the abruptness of the displacement or deformation at a certain characteristic location and connectivity of plastic zone, an example slope is analyzed by using the elastoplastic FEM based on the SSR technique. The computed results are compared with the solution of the Spencer’s procedure of limit equilibrium. It is shown that the safety factors computed by using the criteria respectively based on the abruptness of the displacement or deformation at a certain characteristic location and connectivity of plastic zone are almost identical to the solution of limit equilibrium method, while the elastoplastic FEM analysis based on the convergence of numerical computations may give an incredible estimation of the safety factor in some circumstances. Considering the feasibility and simplification in engineering practices, both criteria based on the abruptness of the displacement or deformation at a certain characteristic location and connectivity of plastic zone are suggested to be jointly used in the elastoplastic FEM analysis of slope stability.

Key words: shear strength reduction (SSR) technique, analysis of slope stability, instability criterion, safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[2] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[3] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[4] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[5] 肖国峰,陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[6] 许 明,唐亚锋,刘先珊,罗 斌,唐道勇,. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[7] 李清川,李术才,王汉鹏,张红军,张 冰,张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[8] 严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[9] 温树杰,梁 超,宋亮亮,刘 刚,. 基于最小势能法的三维临界滑裂面搜索方法[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2708-2714.
[10] 张海涛,罗先启,沈 辉,毕金锋. 基于矢量和的滑面应力抗滑稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1691-1698.
[11] 李 宁,郭双枫,姚显春,. 再论岩质高边坡稳定性分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 397-406.
[12] 王 振,叶晓明,刘永新,. 考虑滑坡渐进破坏的改进简布条分法[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 675-682.
[13] 张 明,姜福兴,李家卓,焦振华,胡 浩,舒凑先,高化军,. 基于巨厚岩层-煤柱协同变形的煤柱稳定性[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 705-714.
[14] 尹光志,王文松,魏作安,曹冠森,张千贵,敬小非,. 地震作用下高堆尾矿坝永久变形与稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3717-3726.
[15] 陈祖煜,黎康平,李 旭,詹成明,. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定容许安全系数取值标准初探[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 1-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[2] 陈红江,李夕兵,刘爱华. 矿井突水水源判别的多组逐步Bayes判别方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3655 -3659 .
[3] 和法国,谌文武,韩文峰,张景科. 高分子材料SH固沙性能与微结构相关性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3803 -3807 .
[4] 雷永生. 西安地铁二号线下穿城墙及钟楼保护措施研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 223 -228 .
[5] 尚守平,岁小溪,周志锦,刘方成,熊 伟. 橡胶颗粒-砂混合物动剪切模量的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 377 -381 .
[6] 肖 忠,王元战,及春宁,黄泰坤,单 旭. 波浪作用下加固软基上大圆筒结构稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2648 -2654 .
[7] 李 峰,王晓睿,罗晓辉,郭院成. 基坑坑底稳定性的机会约束评估方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3867 -3874 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,陈丽霞,李远耀. 岩体结构控制下的斜坡变形特征[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 521 -525 .
[9] 徐 扬,高 谦,李 欣,李俊华,贾云喜. 土石混合体渗透性现场试坑试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 855 -858 .
[10] 章定文,刘松玉,顾沉颖. 各向异性初始应力状态下圆柱孔扩张理论弹塑性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1631 -1634 .