膨胀土判别与分类方法探讨

›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 1895-1899.

膨胀土判别与分类方法探讨

陈善雄^{1, 2}，余颂²，孔令伟²，郭爱国²，刘观仕²

1. 华中科技大学土木工程与力学学院，武汉 430072；2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所，武汉 430071

收稿日期:2005-02-27 出版日期:2005-12-10 发布日期:2014-01-12
作者简介:陈善雄，男，1965年生，博士研究生，副研究员，主要从事非饱和土土力学和地基处理的理论与工程应用研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 50279050）。

Study on approach to identification and classification of expansive soils

CHEN Shan-xiong^1,2, YU Song², KONG Ling-wei², GUO Ai-guo², LIU Guan-shi²

1. College of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; 2. Institute of Rock & Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071 China

Received:2005-02-27 Online:2005-12-10 Published:2014-01-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 膨胀土的胀缩等级评判是进行膨胀土处治的首要任务，开展膨胀土的判别与分类方法探讨具有重要意义。对现有膨胀土判别与分类方法进行了评价，对反映和表征膨胀土胀缩机理和特性的指标进行了深入探讨，提出了以能充分反映和表征膨胀土胀缩机理和特性的液限、塑性指数、自由膨胀率、小于0.005 mm颗粒含量、胀缩总率等5个指标作为膨胀土的判别指标，建立了一种新的膨胀土判别与分类方法，并通过试验进行了验证。新的膨胀土判别与分类方法具有准确度高、易操作的优点。

关键词: 膨胀土, 判别与分类, 膨胀潜势

Abstract: The identification and classification of expansive soils is the problems that should be firstly solved in construction in expansive soil region. The existing approach to identification and classification of expansive soils has been evaluated. The indices that can reflect and characterize swell-shrink mechanism and property were analyzed. The analysis indicates that 5 indices such as liquid limit, plastic limit , clay particles, free swell ratio, swell-shrink total ratio can reflect and characterize swell-shrink mechanism and property; hereby these 5 indices have been suggested as identification and classification indices of expansive soils; and a new approach of 5- indices including liquid limit , plastic limit , clay particles, free swell ratio, swell-shrink total ratio, for identification and classification of expansive soils has been established. The new approach to identification and classification of expansive soils has been validated and it has been shown that the new approach is easy and reliable.

Key words: expansive soils, identification and classification, swell potential index

中图分类号:

TU 443

陈善雄，余颂，孔令伟，郭爱国，刘观仕,. 膨胀土判别与分类方法探讨[J]. , 2005, 26(12): 1895-1899.

CHEN Shan-xiong , YU Song , KONG Ling-wei , GUO Ai-guo , LIU Guan-shi,. Study on approach to identification and classification of expansive soils[J]. , 2005, 26(12): 1895-1899.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[2]	郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[3]	庄心善, 王俊翔, 王康, 李凯, 胡智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[4]	李国维, 施赛杰, 侯宇宙, 吴建涛, 李峰, 吴少甫, . 引江济淮试验工程非膨胀土开发技术实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 302-314.
[5]	胡东旭，李贤，周超云，薛乐，刘洪伏，汪时机. 膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 318-324.
[6]	杨和平，唐咸远，王兴正，肖杰，倪啸，. 有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2311-2317.
[7]	张春晓，肖宏彬，包嘉邈，尹亚虎，尹铎霖. 膨胀土应力松弛的分数阶模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1747-1752.
[8]	毛新，汪时机, 程明书，陈正汉，王晓琪，. 膨胀土初始破损与湿干交替耦合作用下的力学行为[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 571-579.
[9]	姚传芹，韦昌富，马田田，陈合龙，陈火东，. 孔隙溶液对膨胀土力学性质影响[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 116-122.
[10]	鲜少华，许英姿，姚海林，卢正，李志勇，董城,. 锚固加强植被系统约束膨胀土变形模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 158-166.
[11]	池泽成，陈善雄，周哲，戴张俊，宋瑞军, . 合肥重塑膨胀土三向膨胀力试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 381-386.
[12]	吴珺华，杨松，. 干湿循环下膨胀土基质吸力测定及其对抗剪强度影响试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 678-684.
[13]	邓友生，吴鹏，赵明华，段邦政，. 基于最优含水率的聚丙烯纤维增强膨胀土强度研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 349-353.
[14]	吴庆华，张家发，崔皓东，朱国胜，刘习银,. 细/粗粒二元结构边坡的排水防渗效果试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 392-399.
[15]	李晶晶，孔令伟，穆坤, . 膨胀土原位孔内剪切试验与强度响应特征[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 453-461.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed