真空预压中真空度与孔隙水压力的关系分析

›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 1949-1952.

真空预压中真空度与孔隙水压力的关系分析

张功新^{1, 2}，莫海鸿¹，董志良²，赵建国³

1. 华南理工大学土木工程系，广州 510640； 2. 广州四航工程技术研究院，广州 510230；3. 建材广州地质工程勘察院，广州 510403

收稿日期:2004-12-24 出版日期:2005-12-10 发布日期:2014-01-12
作者简介:张功新，男，1970年生，高级工程师，博士研究生，主要从事地下结构与岩土工程方面的研究
基金资助:
广东省交通厅资助项目（No. 2002-05）；广州四航工程技术研究院资助项目（No. 岩S2004004）

Analysis of relationship between vacuity and pore-water pressure in vacuum preloading

ZHANG Gong-xin ^1,2, MO Hai-hong¹, DONG Zhi-liang², ZHAO Jian-guo³

1. Department of Civil Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; 2. Guangzhou Sihang Institute of Engeering Technology, Guangzhou 510230, China; 3. Guangzhou Geotechnical Investigation Institute of Building Material, Guangzhou 510403, China

Received:2004-12-24 Online:2005-12-10 Published:2014-01-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 真空度与孔隙水压力是两个不同的概念，在土体中某点真空表测试的真空度与测点处的孔压差并不相同，但它们有着内在的联系。根据气体状态方程和平衡方程，推导出在某点真空表反映的真空度值与孔压计反映的孔压差的理论关系式。测点在地下水位以上时，两者的测试结果是一致的；测点在地下水位以下时，真空度小于孔压差，两者可按公式进行换算。测试结果表明：现场实测结果与理论计算结果基本吻合，证实了理论推导的正确性，也说明了真空表内真空度与孔隙水压力的关系。

关键词: 真空表, 孔压计, 真空预压, 真空度, 孔隙水压力

Abstract: Vacuity and pore-water pressure are two different conceptions, the vacuity measured by vacuum meter in the soft soil is different from the difference of pore-water pressure measured by piezometer; but there is an immanent relation between them. The theoretical formula about vacuity in vacuum tube and pore-water pressure at the observation point was obtained in this paper by using equation of gas state and equilibrium equation. When the observation point is above the groundwater surface, the vacuity is the same as the difference of pore-water pressure. When the observation point is under the groundwater surface, the vacuity is less than the difference of pore-water pressure, but they can be calculated each other by using the theoretical formula. The test results explain the relations between the vacuity and the pore-water pressure and show that the theoretical formula is correct.

Key words: vacuum meter, piezometer, vacuum preloading, vacuity, pore-water pressure

中图分类号:

TU 432

张功新，莫海鸿，董志良，赵建国,. 真空预压中真空度与孔隙水压力的关系分析[J]. , 2005, 26(12): 1949-1952.

ZHANG Gong-xin , MO Hai-hong , DONG Zhi-liang , ZHAO Jian-guo,. Analysis of relationship between vacuity and pore-water pressure in vacuum preloading[J]. , 2005, 26(12): 1949-1952.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	贺桂成, 廖家海, 李丰雄, 王昭, 章求才, 张志军. 水饱和边坡夹层热-孔隙水-力耦合作用模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1663-1672.
[2]	杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[3]	汪华斌, 李建梅, 金怡轩, 周博, 周宇, . 降雨诱发边坡破坏数值模拟两个关键问题的解决方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 777-784.
[4]	尹晓萌, 晏鄂川, 刘旭耀, 李兴明, . 土体稳定性计算中地下水作用力探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 156-164.
[5]	赵建军，余建乐，解明礼，柴贺军，李涛，步凡，蔺冰，. 降雨诱发填方路堤边坡变形机制物理模拟研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2933-2940.
[6]	柳晓科，鹿群，路士伟，刘春龙，郭少龙,. 低裙式吸力桩真空沉贯及抗拔极限承载力[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2089-2098.
[7]	张修照，巫尚蔚，张超，杨春和，. 不同固结条件下尾矿动孔压演化规律[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 815-822.
[8]	王永洪，张明义，刘俊伟，白晓宇, . 超孔隙水压力对低塑性黏性土桩土界面抗剪强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
[9]	陈卫忠，马永尚，于洪丹，龚哲，李香玲，. 泥岩核废料处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 407-416.
[10]	刘忠玉, 张家超, 郑占垒, 关聪. 考虑Hansbo渗流的二维Biot固结有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4617-4626.
[11]	刘世伟，盛谦，朱泽奇，龚彦峰，崔臻，李建贺，张善凯，. 隧道围岩内地下水渗流边界效应影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4001-4009.
[12]	杨耀辉，陈育民，刘汉龙，李文闻，江强, . 排水刚性桩群桩抗液化性能的振动台试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4025-4032.
[13]	周正龙，陈国兴，赵凯，吴琪，马维嘉. 循环加载方向角对饱和粉土不排水动力特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 36-44.
[14]	黄朝煊，王正中，方咏来,. 考虑漏气及井阻非线性的真空预压地基固结解析解[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2574-2582.
[15]	张明义，白晓宇，高强，王永洪，陈小钰，刘俊伟，. 黏性土中桩-土界面受力机制室内试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2167-2174.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed