›› 2014, Vol. 299 ›› Issue (2): 474-480.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

古建筑风化石质构件力学参数的确定方法

刘成禹1,何满潮2   

  1. 1.福州大学 环境与资源学院,福州 350108;2.中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2012-11-18 出版日期:2014-02-11 发布日期:2014-02-18
  • 作者简介:刘成禹,男,1970年生,博士,副教授,主要从事工程地质、隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41272300)

Methods to obtain mechanical parameters of weathered rock constructional elements of ancient buildings

LIU Cheng-yu1, HE Man-chao2   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China) 2. College of Mechanics and Architecture, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2012-11-18 Online:2014-02-11 Published:2014-02-18

摘要: 针对目前常规确定岩石力学参数的方法只能得出岩块的整体强度,不能反映古建筑石质构件风化层内力学参数逐渐变化,无法很好地满足石质古建筑稳定性、耐久性研究的不足,提出了综合运用现场穿透波CT测试、表面回弹测试和室内试验确定风化石质构件力学参数的方法。方法的实施主要包括:通过现场穿透波CT测试,获得纵波波速在石质构件深度剖面上的分布;现场选取与欲研究的石质构件类似的岩石做室内力学试验和波速测试,得出力学参数与波速的统计关系;上述两者结合得出力学参数在石质构件深度剖面上的分布,在此基础上分析风化层内力学参数随深度的变化关系;对不同风化分区代表性石构件进行风化深度研究和表面回弹测试,得出构件表面强度比与风化深度的关系。以义乌宋代古月桥为例,对其方法进行了系统的介绍,并对古月桥承载条石风化层内力学参数随深度的变化关系以及表面强度与风化深度的关系进行了研究。研究表明:义乌宋代古月桥承载条石风化层内的抗压强度比、弹性模量比随深度呈负指数关系变化;表面强度比与风化深度呈2次多项式关系。

关键词: 风化, 石质构件, 力学参数, 声波测试, 回弹测试

Abstract: The conventional method of determining rock mechanical parameters now can only obtain the overall strength of the rock; while in the weathered layer of ancient buildings rock constructional elements, of which the mechanical parameters gradually change. It is not enough to study the stability and durability of rock ancient buildings. So a method with integrated use of on-site sonic CT test, surface rebound and laboratory test to obtain the mechanical parameters of rock constructional elements is proposed. The method is put into action as follows. The longitudinal wave velocity distributions along the depth profile in the rock constructional elements are acquired by the on-site sonic CT test. The statistical relation of the mechanical parameters and wave velocity is obtained by selecting rock on-site that analogous to the rock constructional element studied to do the indoor mechanical tests and the wave velocity test. The mechanical parameters distribution along the depth profile in the rock constructional elements is derived by combining the outcomes mentioned above; based on this, the relationship between mechanical parameters and depth within the weathered layer is analyzed. The relationship between the surface compressive strength ratio and the weathered depth is derived by weathered depth studying and surface rebound test on the typical rock constructional element in different weathering zones. This method is systematically introduced in this paper with the example of Guyue Bridge in Yiwu built in the Song Dynasty. This paper studied the relationship between mechanical parameters and depth within the weathered layer and the relationship between surface strength of rock constructional element and weathered depth of weathered rock constructional element which were in the bearing structure of the Song Dynasty Guyue Bridge in Yiwu. The studies show that: in the bearing block stone of the Song Dynasty Guyue Bridge, the compressive strength ratio and the elastic modulus ratio vary negative-exponentially with the depth in weathered layer; the relationship between compressive strength ratio of surface and weathered depth conforms to the two order polynomial.

Key words: weathering, rock constructional element, mechanical parameters, sonic test, rebound test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军 , 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[2] 谌民, 张涛, 单华刚, 王新志, 孟庆山, 余克服, . 钙质砂压缩波速与物理性质参数关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2275-2283.
[3] 孙钱程, 郑民总, 李邵军, 郭浩森, 程 远, 裴书锋, 江 权, . 柱状节理岩体隧洞松弛深度的 变异特性与确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 728-736.
[4] 丁瑜, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 贾羽, . 风化红砂岩残积土路基瞬态饱和区动态水压力 特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4740-4750.
[5] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[6] 张传庆,高 阳,刘 宁,周 辉,冯夏庭, . 深埋隧洞力学响应监测与测试设计的思考[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2626-2631.
[7] 姜光成,胡乃联,洪根意,李国清,方京珍,. 基于GSI值量化和修正方法的岩体力学参数确定[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2211-2218.
[8] 牛 庚,孙德安,韦昌富,颜荣涛,. 基于孔径分布的全风化泥岩持水曲线推算[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1337-1345.
[9] 崔 强, 程永锋, 鲁先龙, 谢 枫, 孙付涛, . 强风化岩中挖孔基础抗拔试验及荷载位移曲线 模型参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4597-4604.
[10] 宿 辉, 杨家琦, 胡宝文, 高 轩, 马 辉, . 颗粒离散元岩石模型的颗粒尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4642-4651.
[11] 陈 毅,张虎元,杨 龙, . 遗址土劣化进程中微观结构变化的类比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4117-4124.
[12] 崔 臻,盛 谦, . 裂隙岩体等效力学参数结构效应的计算机模拟试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3830-3840.
[13] 闫长斌. 基于声波频谱特征的岩体爆破累积损伤效应分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2721-2727.
[14] 刘金泉,杨典森,陈卫忠,袁敬强,李长俊,亓宪寅,. 全风化花岗岩突水通道扩展的颗粒起动流速研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1179-1187.
[15] 苏承东,韦四江,秦本东,杨玉顺,. 高温对细砂岩力学性质影响机制的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 623-630.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] 胡大伟,周 辉,谢守益,张 凯,邵建富,冯夏庭. 大理岩破坏阶段Biot系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3727 -3732 .
[3] 师旭超,韩 阳. 卸荷作用下软黏土回弹吸水试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 732 -736 .
[4] 朱建明,彭新坡,姚仰平,徐金海. SMP准则在计算煤柱极限强度中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2987 -2990 .
[5] 原喜忠,李 宁,赵秀云,杨银涛. 东北多年冻土地区地基承载力对气候变化敏感性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[6] 唐利民. 地基沉降预测模型的正则化算法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[7] 李占海,朱万成,冯夏庭,李绍军,周 辉,陈炳瑞. 侧压力系数对马蹄形隧道损伤破坏的影响研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 434 -441 .
[8] 蔡辉腾,危福泉,蔡宗文. 重庆主城区粉质黏土动力特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[9] 宋 玲 ,刘奉银 ,李 宁 . 旋压入土式静力触探机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .
[10] 金解放 ,李夕兵 ,殷志强 ,邹 洋. 循环冲击下波阻抗定义岩石损伤变量的研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1385 -1393 .