›› 2014, Vol. 299 ›› Issue (2): 481-489.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单井点和单排井点布置的真空降水现场试验及比较研究

聂庆科1, 2,王英辉1, 2,白 冰3,贾向新1, 3,任国家3   

  1. 1.河北建设勘察研究院有限公司,石家庄 050031;2.河北省岩土工程技术研究中心,石家庄 050031; 3.北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2012-11-20 出版日期:2014-02-11 发布日期:2014-02-18
  • 作者简介:聂庆科,男,1965年生,教授级高工,主要从事岩土工程设计、施工与理论分析研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51279002)

Field tests comparative study of vacuum well-point dewatering under a single well-point or a single row well-point

NIE Qing-ke1, 2, WANG Ying-hui1, 2, BAI Bing3, JIA Xiang-xin1, 3, REN Guo-jia3   

  1. 1. Hebei Research Institute of Construction and Geotechnical Investigation Co. Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050031, China; 2. The Technology Center of Geotechnical Engineering of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2012-11-20 Online:2014-02-11 Published:2014-02-18

摘要: 研究单井点和单排井点真空降水条件下,地层中地下水水位和抽水流量,在重力场和真空压力场耦合作用下的变化过程,并进行比较分析。试验表明,对于单井点排水条件,随着真空负压力和抽水井深度的增大,水位的下降有一定增加,而离开抽水井点较远处的水位下降更为明显。单排井点布置条件下,随着抽水井深度和抽水井间距的增大,无论是抽水井点布置方向还是垂直于抽水井点布置方向的地下水位的下降深度将有明显增大,而沿抽水井布置方向的水位下降深度更为显著。此外,在多次反复降水条件下,后续降水过程中地下水位的下降速率将有增快的趋势。试验还表明,抽水井井口的负压力小于真空泵出水口处的负压力,损失量可达12.5%,因此,在进行真空降水设计时需要考虑出水管道的长度。

关键词: 单井点, 单排井点, 地下水位, 粉土地基, 真空负压力

Abstract: Based on the field tests of vacuum well-point dewatering, the evolutions of groundwater level and the variations of the water flow in silt ground layer are studied under combined gravitational and vacuum negative pressure, which include both the cases of a single well-point and a single row well-point. Test results show that, for the condition of a single well, the declining depths of groundwater level increase with the increase of vacuum negative pressure and the depth of drainage well, and the declines of groundwater level at the points away from the drainage well will be more obvious. For the condition of a single row well-point, with the increase of the depth and space of drainage wells, the declines of groundwater level are also very apparent whether along the direction of well-point arrange or in the perpendicular direction of well-point arrange; and the former is more obvious. On the other hand, the declining ratio of groundwater level has an increasing trend after several repeated dewatering processes. Besides, the vacuum pressure in the mouth of a well is lower than it in the water outlet of vacuum pump with a loss of approximately 12.5%, which indicates that the length of the pipeline of water outlet should be considered in the design of vacuum well-point dewatering in practice.

Key words: single well-point, single row well-point, groundwater level, silt foundation, vacuum negative pressure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层 变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[2] 郑 刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈 达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.
[3] 刘路路,宋 亮,焦玉勇,王 浩,张秀丽,谢壁婷, . 库水位波动条件下黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体稳定性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 359-366.
[4] 鲍树峰,娄 炎,董志良,牛 飞,谢荣星, . 负压环境下新型地下水位测试装置研发[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3067-3073.
[5] 马少坤,邵 羽,吕 虎,WONG K S ,吴宏伟,陈 欣,江 杰,. 地下水位循环变化时隧道开挖对群桩的长期影响研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1563-1568.
[6] 张 飞,李镜培,孙长安,沈广军,李 飞,. 软土狭长深基坑抗隆起破坏模式试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2825-2832.
[7] 赵代鹏,王世梅,谈云志,占清华. 库水升降作用下浮托减重型滑坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1017-1024.
[8] 夏力农 ,苗云东 ,谈铁强. 带承台群桩负摩阻力性状的三维有限元分析[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 887-891.
[9] 刘 杰,姚海林,胡梦玲,卢 正,余东明,陈风光. 水位波动下路基湿度动态响应及地下防排水模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2917-2922.
[10] 魏 纲,郭志威,魏新江,陈伟军. 软土隧道盾构出洞灾害的渗流应力耦合分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 383-387.
[11] 兰常玉,张向东. 季节性冻土区路基置换层参数确定试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 102-104.
[12] 周 琦,刘汉龙,顾长存. 真空预压条件下地下水位和出水量现场测试研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3435-3440.
[13] 季 宏 ,赵森林 ,刘应辉 ,焦志斌 . 人工岛抗浮、防水设计水位选取分析[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 197-200.
[14] 夏建中 ,罗战友 , 龚晓南,. 钱塘江边基坑的降水设计与监测[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 655-658.
[15] 姜晨光 ,李少红 ,贺 勇 ,张清峰 ,姜 勇,. 地下水位变化与库岸滑坡体稳定性关系的研究[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 403-406.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔 凯,谌文武,张景科,韩文峰,梁收运. 多元层状边坡土体风蚀速率与微结构参数关系[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2741 -2746 .
[2] 李加贵,陈正汉,黄雪峰,李 佳. 原状非饱和Q3黄土的土压力原位测试和强度特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 433 -440 .
[3] 胡明鉴,汪 稔,陈中学,王志兵. 泥石流启动过程PFC数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 394 -397 .
[4] 张建新,刘双菊,周嘉宾. 逆作基坑开挖卸荷对工程结构的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 218 -223 .
[5] 白 冰,李春峰. 地铁列车振动作用下近距离平行隧道的弹塑性动力响应[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 123 -128 .
[6] 薛云亮,李庶林,林 峰,徐宏斌. 考虑损伤阀值影响的钢纤维混凝土损伤本构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 1987 -1992 .
[7] 任 重,盛 谦. 我国岩石力学学科结构及其演变初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 293 -298 .
[8] 张军辉. 不同软基处理方式下高速公路加宽工程变形特性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1216 -1222 .
[9] 王亮清,P.H.S.W. Kulatilake,唐辉明,梁 烨,吴 琼. 双临空面岩质边坡滑动与倾倒破坏的运动学分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 72 -77 .
[10] 李 旭,张利民,敖国栋. 失水过程孔隙结构、孔隙比、含水率变化规律[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 100 -105 .