›› 2014, Vol. 299 ›› Issue (2): 565-572.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于岩体精细化描述的围岩分类及力学参数概率分布特征分析

申艳军1,徐光黎2,杨更社1,叶万军1   

  1. 1.西安科技大学 建筑与土木工程学院,西安 710054;2.中国地质大学 岩土钻掘与防护教育部工程研究中心,武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-10 出版日期:2014-02-11 发布日期:2014-02-18
  • 作者简介:申艳军,男,1984年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下工程岩体质量与稳定性评价方面的工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41272340,No. 41172262,No. 41302228);陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(No. 2013JK0948);西安科技大学校级科研培育基金项目(No.201232)

Probability distribution characteristics of rock mass classification and its mechanical parameters based on fine description

SHEN Yan-jun1, XU Guang-li2, YANG Geng-she1, YE Wan-jun1   

  1. 1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China; 2. Engineering Research Center of Rock-Soil Drilling and Excavation and Protection of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2012-12-10 Online:2014-02-11 Published:2014-02-18

摘要: 针对目前水电站地下厂房工程中不同围岩分类方法存在评价结果不一致、围岩力学参数存在室内试验值与实际情况不吻合的现象,现推荐采用岩体精细化描述体系对围岩岩体结构进行定量化评价。将常用围岩分类方法(RMR、Q、RMi、GSI、BQ、HC)评价指标予以归纳分组,并通过各组内不同指标对比分析获得围岩分类方法中的基础评价指标。以大岗山水电站主厂房某区段为分析对象,采取现场岩体精细化地质素描与后期数据挖掘、拟合相结合方法,并依据评价指标间的关联关系,获得了基础、非基础评价指标的分布概型及对应参数,实现对该段围岩岩体精细化描述认知;基于精细化描述结果,应用Monte Carlo法生成符合各评价指标分布概型的大量随机数,而后参照各分类方法评价思路与评分流程,得到评价指标在各分类方法对应的大量随机评分值,通过归纳统计获得不同围岩分类方法评价结果的分布概型;基于各围岩分类方法评价结果与力学参数值之间的关联关系实现对力学参数概率特征分析。该分析方法与思路可为类似工程围岩质量及力学参数的精确确定提供一定借鉴,并可为实现围岩支护极限状态设计提供必要的原始参数支持。

关键词: 岩体精细化描述, 围岩分类, 力学参数, Monte Carlo法, 概率分布特征

Abstract: According to the drawbacks that the evaluation results by different rock mass classification systems are not consistent and the rock mass mechanical parameters between indoor tests and current situation have a great gap, a method named rock mass fine description system is recommended to describe surrounding rock mass structures quantitatively. Firstly, these evaluation indexes of the common rock mass classification systems(RMR、Q、RMi、GSI、BQ、HC) are summarized as some groups, and basic indexes are selected from these groups by the in-detail comparative analysis. Then, some sections of powerhouse in Danggangshan hydropower station are chosen as the research objects; we use the method combining the in-situ rock mass fine geological sketches with post-data mining and fitting, and based on the association relationship between the ranking parameters and the basic ones, these probabilistical distribution models and their relevant parameters of evaluation indexes are able to be required; thus the surrounding rock mass elaborate descriptions of the section can be obtained. Based on the rock mass fine description, lots of random numbers that meeting the probabilistical distribution models and relevant parameters of these evaluation indexes can be produced by the Monte Carlo simulation; and then according to the evaluation idea and rating process of each rock mass classification system, plenty of corresponding random rating-values of these evaluation indexes are also gained; the surrounding rock mass evaluation results and these probabilistical distribution characteristics by six rock mass classification systems can be attained easily by the inductive statistics. At last, these probabilistical distribution characteristics and their relevant parameters of these rock mass mechanical parameters can be decided by the correlation formulas between them and the rock mass classification indexes. This research can provide some references to estimate accurately the rock mass classification and mechanical parameters in some similar projects, and offer the essential primary data for supporting limit state design to the surrounding rock mass.

Key words: rock mass fine description system, rock mass classification, mechanical parameters, Monte Carlo simulation, probabilistical distribution characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 谌民, 张涛, 单华刚, 王新志, 孟庆山, 余克服, . 钙质砂压缩波速与物理性质参数关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2275-2283.
[2] 黄生根, 沈佳虹, 李 萌, . 钻孔灌注桩压浆后承载性能的可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1977-1982.
[3] 姜光成,胡乃联,洪根意,李国清,方京珍,. 基于GSI值量化和修正方法的岩体力学参数确定[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2211-2218.
[4] 宿 辉, 杨家琦, 胡宝文, 高 轩, 马 辉, . 颗粒离散元岩石模型的颗粒尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4642-4651.
[5] 崔 臻,盛 谦, . 裂隙岩体等效力学参数结构效应的计算机模拟试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3830-3840.
[6] 苏承东,韦四江,秦本东,杨玉顺,. 高温对细砂岩力学性质影响机制的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 623-630.
[7] 江 权,崔 洁,冯夏庭,刘国锋,王百林,刘 挺,吕勇刚,. 玄武岩力学参数的随机性统计与概率分布估计[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 784-792.
[8] 冯 帆,邱信蛟,张国新,管俊峰,王 丹,. 基于施工期变形监测的特高拱坝力学参数反演研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 237-246.
[9] 温 勇,杨光华,汤连生,徐传堡,黄致兴,黄忠铭,张玉成, . 广州地区花岗岩残积土力学特性试验及参数研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 209-215.
[10] 王开禾,罗先启,沈 辉,张海涛. 围岩力学参数反演的GSA-BP神经网络模型及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 631-638.
[11] 豆红强,韩同春,龚晓南,李智宁,邱子义,. 降雨条件下考虑饱和渗透系数变异性的边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1144-1152.
[12] 胡 政 ,刘佑荣 ,王平易 ,田茂中,. 基于开挖卸荷劣化的边坡岩体宏观力学参数USMR分析评价方法及验证[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3491-3498.
[13] 马 非 ,贾善坡,. 泥岩巷道围岩弹塑性参数反演分析与长期稳定性预测[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1987-1994.
[14] 邱道宏 ,李术才 ,薛翊国 ,田 昊 ,闫茂旺,. 基于数字钻进技术和量子遗传-径向基函数神经网络的围岩类别超前识别技术研究[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 2013-2018.
[15] 刘成禹 ,何满潮,. 古建筑风化石质构件力学参数的确定方法[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 474-480.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[5] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[6] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[7] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[8] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[9] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[10] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .