›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (S1): 442-448.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

试验条件对土工格栅与膨胀土界面拉拔性状的影响

汪明元1, 2,包承纲2,丁金华2,蔡剑韬2, 3   

  1. 1.浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310027;2.长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉 430010; 3.华南理工大学 交通与土木学院,广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2008-07-25 出版日期:2008-11-11 发布日期:2016-04-15
  • 作者简介:汪明元,男,1972年生,高级工程师,主要从事加筋土、土石坝、膨胀土及土工数值方法研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家“十一五”科技支撑计划重大项目资助(No. 2006BAB04A10)。

Effect of some test conditions on pull-out behaviors of interface between geogrids and compacted expansive soils

WANG Ming-yuan1, 2, BAO Cheng-gang2, DING Jin-hua2, CAI Jian-tao2, 3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; 2. Key Lab of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2008-07-25 Online:2008-11-11 Published:2016-04-15

摘要: 采用高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)单向土工格栅,以及南水北调中线工程新乡段的膨胀性泥灰岩风化土,在填土尺寸为600 mm×600 mm×600 mm的大型叠环式剪切试验机上进行一系列拉拔试验,研究了土工格栅与试验箱侧壁距离、拉拔速率、上覆荷载大小等试验条件因素对筋土界面拉拔性状的影响。结果表明:不排水条件下,土工格栅与试验箱侧壁的距离,对峰值拉拔力、界面强度与切向刚度的影响不大;拉拔速率较大时,拉拔力增长较快,其拉拔力峰值和界面强度较大;上覆荷载和拉拔力不同,格栅的变形量及筋土相对位移量不同,不同上覆荷载下界面摩阻力沿格栅埋入长度分布的非均匀程度不同,并可导致较小上覆荷载下界面平均摩阻力反而较大的反常行为。

关键词: 土工格栅, 膨胀土, 相互作用, 拉拔速率, 边界效应, 南水北调工程

Abstract: Expansive soil reinforced with geogrids to construct embankment, or to strengthen and protect the excavated expansive soils and rock slope is successfully applied; and this techonology has significant values both in the prevention of geological disaster and project construction. So a filling soils with dimensions of 600 mm×600 mm×600 mm laminated shear test apparatus is employed to carry out a series of pull-out tests, with HDPE uniaxial geogrid, and the weathered expansive marlite in Xinxiang, the middle route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project. The factors of test conditions effecting the pull-out behaviors of the interface, such as distance between geogrid and the test box wall, the pull-out velocity, and the upper load are studied. Results show that the peak value of pull-out force, the strength and tangent rigidity of the interface are not evidently effected by the distance between geogrid and wall of the test box under the undrained conditions. The pull-out force increases rapidly with the increase of pull-out velocity, and the peak value of pull-out force and the interface strength is greater. The geogrid deformation and the relative displacement between geogrid and soils differ with the difference of the upper load and pull-out forces. The heterogeneous degree of friction of the interface distribution along the embeded length of geogrid differs with the different upper load; and this can lead to the abnormal behavior that the average friction of the interface is bigger even when the upper load is smaller.

Key words: geogrid, expansive soil, interaction, pull-out velocity, boundary effect, South to North Water Transfer Project

中图分类号: 

  • TU 531.7
[1] 卢俊龙, 张荫, . 地基与密肋复合墙结构相互作用系统频域 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2163-2171.
[2] 史 吏, 王慧萍, 孙宏磊, 潘晓东, . 群桩基础引发饱和地基振动的近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1750-1760.
[3] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[4] 张 聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹 磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[5] 王宇飞, 刘 润. 砂土中浅埋管道在竖向−水平荷载空间的 承载力包络线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1129-1139.
[6] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[7] 刘方成, 吴孟桃, 杨 峻, . 土工格栅加筋橡胶砂强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 580-591.
[8] 郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景 丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基 挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[9] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[10] 马显春, 罗 刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[11] 李国维, 施赛杰, 侯宇宙, 吴建涛, 李 峰, 吴少甫, . 引江济淮试验工程非膨胀土开发技术实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 302-314.
[12] 汪益敏,闫 岑,于 恒,李 奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[13] 胡东旭,李 贤,周超云,薛 乐,刘洪伏,汪时机. 膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 318-324.
[14] 宋 佳,杜修力,许成顺,孙宝印,. 饱和土场地-桩基-地上结构体系的地震响应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3061-3070.
[15] 杨和平,唐咸远,王兴正,肖 杰,倪 啸,. 有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2311-2317.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[3] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[4] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[5] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[6] 张建民,王富强. 饱和剪胀性砂土液化后流滑现象与机理[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2711 -2715 .
[7] 王维铭,孙 锐,曹振中,袁晓铭. 国内外地震液化场地特征对比研究[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3913 -3918 .
[8] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[9] 杨 骁,蔡雪琼. 考虑横向效应饱和黏弹性土层中桩的纵向振动[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1857 -1863 .
[10] 周志军 ,陈昌富. 路堤下土工合成材料加固软土地基的极限分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3014 -3018 .