节理岩体动态破坏的SHPB相似材料试验研究

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 659-665.

节理岩体动态破坏的SHPB相似材料试验研究

刘红岩^{1, 2}，邓正定¹，王新生³，张吉宏^{4, 5}，张力民^{6, 7}

1. 中国地质大学（北京）工程技术学院，北京 100083；2. 西藏大学工学院，拉萨 850000；3. 河南理工大学土木工程学院，河南焦作 454000；4. 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院，西安 710064；5. 中国有色金属工业西安勘察设计研究院，西安 710064； 6. 北京科技大学土木工程与环境学院，北京 100083；7. 河北承德钢铁公司，河北承德 067000

收稿日期:2013-02-11 出版日期:2014-03-10 发布日期:2014-03-19
作者简介:刘红岩，男，1975年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（No.2010ZY45）；国家自然科学基金项目（No.41002113, No.41162009）；教育部科学技术研究重点项目（No.211175）；2011年度北京市属高等学校人才强教深化计划人才创新团队项目资助（No.PHR201107143）。

Similar material test study of dynamic failure of jointed rock mass with SHPB

LIU Hong-yan^{1, 2}，DENG Zheng-ding¹，WANG Xin-sheng³，ZHANG Ji-hong^{4, 5}，ZHANG Li-min^{6, 7}

1. College of Engineering & Technology, China University of Geoseiences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Engineering, Tibet University, Lasa 850000, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 4. School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China; 5. Xi’an Engineering Investigation and Design Research Institute of China National Non-ferrous Metals Industry, Xi’an 710064, China; 6. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 7. Hebei Chengde Iron and Steel Corporation, Chengde, Hebei 067000, China

Received:2013-02-11 Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-03-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用相似材料模型试验对不同节理倾角、节理贯通度、节理条数、载荷应变率、节理充填物厚度、节理充填物类型及试件长径比等7种工况下的节理岩体动态强度及破坏模式进行了分离式Hopkinson压杆(SHPB)试验研究。结果表明：节理岩体动态破坏模式及强度与节理构造形态密切相关。对于单节理岩体，其强度及破坏特征在很大程度上受节理倾角控制，节理倾角0°、90°试件动强度分别为完整试件的90%和71%，且其破坏形式均为张拉破坏；倾角60°试件动强度几乎为0；倾角30°、45°试件的动强度分别为完整试件的50%和18%，且其破坏以剪切破坏为主，兼有张拉破坏。中心1/4、1/2、4/5及全贯通节理试件的峰值强度分别为完整试件的95%、74% 、28%和17%，即随节理贯通度增加，试件动强度逐渐降低。含1~3条节理的试件动强度分别为完整试件的54%、23%和10%，即随节理条数增加，试件动强度随之有较大幅度降低，但节理条数的增加并没有改变其破坏模式。随着节理充填物厚度增加及节理充填物强度降低，试件强度依次递减，但破坏模式并没有改变。完整试件和节理试件的动强度均随着载荷应变率的增加而变大，且前者对载荷应变率的敏感性要远远高于后者，相应地试件的破坏模式也变得更加复杂。两类试件的动强度均随着试件长径比的增加先增大后减小，即存在一个最佳长径比。

关键词: 分离式Hopkinson压杆, 节理岩体, 节理性质, 动态强度, 破坏模式, 相似材料试验

Abstract: Failure modes of jointed rock mass with different joint dip angles, joint discontinuity degrees, joint sets, load strain ratios, joint filling thicknesses, joint filling types and slenderness ratios under split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) tests are studied by means of similar material model tests. The results show that failure modes and dynamic strength of jointed rock mass are much related to joint configuration. For rock mass with single joint, its strength and failure characteristics are greatly controlled by the joint dip angle. The dynamic strength of the specimens with joint dip angles of 0° and 90°, whose failure modes are both tensile failure, is 90% and 71% of that of intact one, respectively. The dynamic strength of the specimen with joint dip angle of 60° is nearly zero. The dynamic strength of the specimens with joint dip angles of 30° and 45°, whose failure modes are mainly shear failure with partly tensile failure, is 50% and 18% of that of intact one, respectively. The peak strength of the specimens with 1/4, 1/2, 4/5 and 1 joint center continuity degree is 95%, 74%, 28% and 17% of that of intact one, respectively. With increase of joint discontinuity degree, the dynamic strength of specimen decreases. The dynamic strength of the specimens with 1, 2 and 3 groups of joints is 54%, 23% and 10% of that of intact one, respectively. Namely, with increase of joint group, the dynamic strength of specimen decreases greatly; but its failure mode does not change. With increase of joint filling thickness and strength reduction of joint fillings, the dynamic strength of specimen decreases gradually; but its failure mode does not change. The dynamic strength of the intact and jointed specimens both increase with increasing of load strain ratio; and the sensitivity to load strain ratio of the former is much higher than that of the latter, whose failure mode becomes more complicated accordingly. The dynamic strength of these two kinds of specimens both first increase then decrease with the slenderness ratio; that is to say, there exists a best slenderness ratio.

Key words: split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), jointed rock mass, properties of joint, dynamic strength, failure mode, similar material test

中图分类号:

TU 458

刘红岩，邓正定，王新生，张吉宏，张力民 , . 节理岩体动态破坏的SHPB相似材料试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 659-665.

LIU Hong-yan ，DENG Zheng-ding ，WANG Xin-sheng ，ZHANG Ji-hong ，ZHANG Li-min , . Similar material test study of dynamic failure of jointed rock mass with SHPB[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 659-665.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[2]	王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[3]	戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[4]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[5]	刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[6]	许江, 瞿佳美, 刘义鑫, 彭守建, 王威, 吴善康, . 循环剪切荷载作用下充填物对结构面剪切特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1627-1637.
[7]	李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张彬, 张嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.
[8]	柯志强, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 林志南, 吉华, . 含横向节理的柱状节理岩体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 660-667.
[9]	孙钱程, 郑民总, 李邵军, 郭浩森, 程远, 裴书锋, 江权, . 柱状节理岩体隧洞松弛深度的变异特性与确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 728-736.
[10]	张春生, 赖道平, 吴关叶, 徐建荣, 张伯艳, . 强震作用下复杂边坡块体破坏模式和破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4620-4626.
[11]	崔凯, 冯飞, 谌文武, 汪小海, 程富强, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址裂隙注浆浆液结石体力学兼容性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4627-4636.
[12]	冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[13]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 宋亮, 王浩, 谢壁婷, . 降雨和库水位联合作用下库岸滑坡模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4361-4370.
[14]	王本鑫, 金爱兵, 赵怡晴, 王贺, 孙浩, 刘佳伟, 魏余栋, . 基于CT扫描的含非贯通节理3D打印试件破裂规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3920-3927.
[15]	雷华阳, 刘广学, 周骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed