弹塑性软化模型下隧洞围岩变形与支护压力分析

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 717-722.

弹塑性软化模型下隧洞围岩变形与支护压力分析

崔岚，郑俊杰，章荣军，张威

华中科技大学岩土与地下工程研究所，武汉 430074

收稿日期:2013-01-09 出版日期:2014-03-10 发布日期:2014-03-19
通讯作者: 郑俊杰，男，1967年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土工程与隧道工程方面的教学。E-mail: zhengjj@hust.edu.cn E-mail:cuilan@hust.edu.cn
作者简介:崔岚，女，1989年生，博士研究生，研究方向为隧道工程的数值分析。
基金资助:
山西省交通厅科技建设项目（No.10-2-13）

Study of support pressure and surrounding rock deformation of a circular tunnel with an elastoplastic softening model

CUI Lan，ZHENG Jun-jie，ZHANG Rong-jun，ZHANG Wei

Institute of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2013-01-09 Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-03-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为深入探究岩体非线性软化应变特性对隧洞围岩力学行为的影响，提出了一种考虑软化系数的岩体弹塑性软化模型，并推导了圆形隧洞围岩应力-应变的求解方法。然后，通过将本文方法与Brown方法、换算后的Mohr-Coulomb屈服准则方法进行对比，验证了本文方法的合理性。最后，探究了软化系数对围岩变形及支护压力影响规律。结果表明：软化系数较大时，采用弹塑性软化模型与弹脆塑性模型算得结果基本相同；对围岩变形及稳定性起主要控制作用的是松动区域范围；控制塑性区域出现时的临界支护压力在数值上与弹塑性区域交界处径向应力是相等的。

关键词: 弹塑性软化模型, Hoek-Brown屈服准则, 软化系数, 围岩变形

Abstract: To provide an insight into the effect of the nonlinear strain-softening phenomenon on the mechanical behavior of the surrounding rock mass, an elastoplastic softening model considering softening coefficient is proposed. The approach for calculating the stress and strain states in the surrounding rock of a circular tunnel is presented. Then, by comparing with Brown’s method and converted Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion method, the proposed model is proved to be reasonable. Finally, effects of softening coefficient on the deformation behavior of surrounding rock and the support pressure are studied. The results show that: when the softening coefficient is relatively large, the result by the elasto-brittle-plastic model is basically identical to that by elastoplastic softening model; it is the radius of the loose region that mainly controls the deformation and stability of surrounding rock; the critical support pressure that controls the appearance of plastic region is equal to the radial stress at the elasticplastic boundary quantitatively.

Key words: elastoplastic softening model, Hoek-Brown failure criterion, softening coefficient, deformation of surrounding rock masses

中图分类号:

TU456

崔岚，郑俊杰，章荣军，张威. 弹塑性软化模型下隧洞围岩变形与支护压力分析[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 717-722.

CUI Lan，ZHENG Jun-jie，ZHANG Rong-jun，ZHANG Wei. Study of support pressure and surrounding rock deformation of a circular tunnel with an elastoplastic softening model[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 717-722.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	侯公羽，李小瑞，梁洪垚，梁金平，周蒙辉，崔永科，. 高强石膏材料配比研究及其在围岩试件(厚壁圆筒) 开挖卸荷试验中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 159-166.
[2]	程建龙，杨圣奇，潘玉丛，田文岭，赵维生,. 挤压地层双护盾TBM围岩变形及应力场特征研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 371-380.
[3]	周浩，肖明，陈俊涛 , . 大型地下洞室全长黏结式岩石锚杆锚固机制研究及锚固效应分析[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1503-1511.
[4]	程建龙，杨圣奇，李学华，潘玉丛，赵维生，田文岭,. 位移释放率对双护盾TBM护盾压力的影响研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1399-1407.
[5]	吴顺川，耿晓杰，高永涛，赵国军，李健，严琼，. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的隧道纵向变形曲线研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 946-952.
[6]	周辉，胡善超，卢景景，王竹春，张传庆，渠成堃，李震,. 煤矿深井巷道掘进全过程围岩变形破坏原位测试[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3523-3530.
[7]	蒲成志，曹平，张春阳，付宗智 , . 双向压缩条件下闭合裂隙岩体断裂破坏机制及渗透压环境判定准则[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 56-60.
[8]	刘成禹，何满潮,. 深埋隧道地质构造发育段围岩压力的特点[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1101-1109.
[9]	罗忆，李新平，徐鹏程，董千，洪吉松 , . 考虑累积损伤效应的围岩变形特性研究[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3041-2048.
[10]	陈小平. 重庆沙溪庙组地层岩石单轴抗压强度研究[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2994-2999.
[11]	邓华锋，朱敏，李建林，王宇，罗骞，原先凡. 砂岩Ⅰ型断裂韧度及其与强度参数的相关性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3585-3591.
[12]	黄志鹏，周江平，许爱平，赫晓光，董燕君. 锦屏一级电站地下厂房岩锚梁载荷试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 471-0475.
[13]	刘保国，徐干成. 大跨度高边墙地下洞室分层间隔施工方法[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2759-2764.
[14]	李晓红，夏彬伟，李丹，韩昌瑞. 深埋隧道层状围岩变形特征分析[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1163-1167.
[15]	张国华，陈礼彪，钱师雄，蔡光远，吴超凡，李祺. 大断面小净距大帽山隧道现场监控量测及分析[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 489-496.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed