条形荷载下挡土墙主动土压力计算

›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (S1): 183-186.

条形荷载下挡土墙主动土压力计算

应宏伟¹，蒋波²，谢康和¹

1. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所，杭州 310027；2. 浙江城建设计集团有限公司，杭州 310006

收稿日期:2007-05-31 出版日期:2007-10-25 发布日期:2014-03-28
作者简介:应宏伟，男，1971年生，博士，副教授，主要从事软土力学与地基处理、土工计算机分析、基坑工程的教学与科研工作

Active earth pressure on retaining wall due to strip surcharge

YING Hong-wei¹, JIANG Bo², XIE Kang-he¹

1. Institute of Geotechenical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; 2. Zhejiang Chengjian Architectural Design and Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China

Received:2007-05-31 Online:2007-10-25 Published:2014-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑条形荷载对滑裂面倾角的影响，改进了库仑土压力理论的极限平衡方法，对条形荷载下的主动土压力进行研究，得到了条形荷载全部作用于土楔体上和被滑裂面截断两种情况下的土压力理论公式。当荷载为0时，该公式可退化到库仑理论。分析表明，在条形荷载被滑裂面截断时，主动滑裂面的倾角不仅与土体内摩擦角、墙土摩擦角、地面倾角等因素有关，而且还与条形荷载的大小和荷载离开墙背的距离有关，土压力系数K随荷载离墙顶水平距离的增大而减小，随荷载的增大而增大。

关键词: 挡土墙, 主动土压力, 条形荷载

Abstract: The effect of strip surcharge on the inclination of sliding plane of soils behind retaining wall is taken into account. New formulas of active earth pressure due to strip surcharge are presented based on Coulomb’s theory. When the surcharge is zero, the formulae are the same as Coulomb’s theory. If the strip surcharge is cut by the sliding plane of soils, it is shown that the obliquity of sliding plane of soils behind the wall is not only related to the angle of internal friction of soil, the angle of wall friction and the inclination of ground, but also to the magnitude of surcharge and the distance of the surcharge from the wall. It is also shown that the farther the surcharge from the wall, the smaller the coefficient of active earth pressure. The bigger the magnitude of strip surcharge, the bigger the coefficient of active earth pressure.

Key words: retaining wall, active earth pressure, strip surcharge

中图分类号:

TU 476

应宏伟，蒋波，谢康和,. 条形荷载下挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 183-186.

YING Hong-wei , JIANG Bo , XIE Kang-he,. Active earth pressure on retaining wall due to strip surcharge[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 183-186.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[2]	芮瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[3]	刘洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[4]	刘美麟，侯艳娟，张顶立，房倩. 砂土地层中考虑基坑施工效应的柔性挡墙主动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 149-158.
[5]	李兆华，胡杰，冯吉利，龚文俊. 基于黏弹塑性本构模型的泥石流数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[6]	杨山奇，卢坤林，史克宝，赵瀚天，陈一鸣，. 刚性挡土墙后三维被动滑裂面的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3303-3312.
[7]	李泽，刘毅，周宇，王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[8]	闫澍旺，李嘉，闫玥，郎瑞卿，纪玉诚, . 轴对称主动土压力问题的滑移线解[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4133-4141.
[9]	陈祖煜，黎康平，李旭，詹成明,. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定容许安全系数取值标准初探[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 1-10.
[10]	杨贵，王阳阳，刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[11]	杨明辉，戴夏斌，赵明华，罗宏. 曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2029-2035.
[12]	骆晗，李荣建，刘军定，霍旭挺，张真，孙萍,. 基于联合强度的黄土主动土压力公式与计算比较[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2080-2086.
[13]	张健，王新征，胡瑞林，. 无限倾斜填土非竖直墙背条件下地震主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1069-1074.
[14]	刘忠玉，陈捷，李东阳,. 考虑剪应力作用的刚性挡土墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2443-2450.
[15]	王闫超，晏鄂川，陆文博，丛璐，朱存金，李兴明，叶世伟. 无黏性有限土体主动土压力解析解[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2513-2520.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed