某反倾页岩边坡破坏面确定及其稳定性分析

›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (S1): 595-598.

某反倾页岩边坡破坏面确定及其稳定性分析

尹锡杰，晏鄂川，孙兆来

中国地质大学工程学院，武汉 430074

收稿日期:2007-05-20 出版日期:2007-10-25 发布日期:2014-03-28
作者简介:尹锡杰，女，1981年生，硕士研究生，主要从事岩土体稳定性评价与治理方面的研究。
基金资助:
湖北省自然科学基金项目（No. 2005ABA277）。

Slip surface ascertaining and stability analyzing of the countertendency shale slope

YIN Xi-jie, YAN E-chuan, SUN Zhao-lai

Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2007-05-20 Online:2007-10-25 Published:2014-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 破坏面确定是边坡稳定性分析的基础，存在各级滑动面。不同结构类型边坡，其确定方法也随之不同。对于反倾软岩边坡，不能通过不连续面空间展布分析确定其破坏面。联合FLAC3D和极限平衡方法分析具有节理块体切割破坏模式的某反倾页岩边坡稳定性。在野外调查基础上分析边坡的变形破坏机制，应用FLAC3D研究其应力、应变等值线及相应增量等值线图确定边坡潜在最危险滑动面和次级滑动面，计算其稳定性系数。在防护设计中考虑次级滑动面，针对边坡危险区域分析其防护效果。应用强度折减计算两危险区域稳定性系数，表明防护后边坡整体稳定性较好。该方法对反倾软岩边坡的稳定性分析有一定的借鉴价值，在防护设计中考虑次级滑动面的影响具有一定的实际指导意义。

关键词: 滑动面, FLAC3D, 极限平衡法, 稳定性系数, 抗剪强度折减

Abstract: The slip surface, which has different grades, is the base of the slope stability analysis and the methods for ascertaining it are different with the different slope structures. For countertendency soft rock slope，it can not be ascertained from the distribution of discontinuities as usual. Combined with FLAC3D and limit equilibrium method, the stability of countertendency shale slope with block cutting by discontinuities failure model is analyzed. Based on the field investigation, the deformation and failure mechanism is studied, the different grades slip surfaces are obtained from the analysis of the strain, stress and their increment pictures from FLAC3D analysis and the factor of safety is computed respectively. The prevention schemes are decided with the considering of the sub slip surface and the prevention effect is analyzed by aiming at the dangerous area. The safety factors of two dangerous areas, which are computed by shear strength reduction, indicate that the stability of the slope after prevention is good. The method used in this paper can be used as a reference to analyzing the stability of countertendency soft rock slope. The consideration of sub slip surface in prevention design has some practical guiding values

Key words: slip surface, FLAC3D, limit equilibrium method, factor of safety, shear strength reduction

中图分类号:

TU454

尹锡杰，晏鄂川，孙兆来. 某反倾页岩边坡破坏面确定及其稳定性分析[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 595-598.

YIN Xi-jie, YAN E-chuan, SUN Zhao-lai. Slip surface ascertaining and stability analyzing of the countertendency shale slope[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 595-598.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[2]	李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[3]	杨秀荣，姜谙男，江宗斌. 含水状态下软岩蠕变试验及损伤模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[4]	刘建，赵国彦，梁伟章，吴浩，彭府华,. 非均匀岩石介质单轴压缩强度及变形破裂规律的数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 505-512.
[5]	高樯，温智，王大雁，牛富俊，谢艳丽，苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
[6]	闫澍旺，李嘉，闫玥，陈浩，. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[7]	刘飞跃，杨天鸿，张鹏海，周靖人，邓文学，侯宪港，赵永川, . 基于声发射的岩石破裂应力场动态反演[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1517-1524.
[8]	邹佑学，王睿，张建民, . 砂土液化大变形模型在FLAC3D中的开发与应用[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1525-1534.
[9]	杨智勇，李典庆，曹子君，唐小松, . 基于广义子集模拟的土坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 957-966.
[10]	蒋毅，魏思宇，尚彦军，高强，李严严,. 深部复合地层力学性质研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 266-272.
[11]	杨涛，黄琳，冯君，吴红刚，戚宗柯，. 基于地震传播过程的滑坡动力稳定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2708-2712.
[12]	杨明辉，戴夏斌，赵明华，罗宏. 曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2029-2035.
[13]	马春景，姜谙男，江宗斌，王善勇,. 基于单元状态指标的盾构隧道水-力耦合模拟分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1762-1770.
[14]	邓东平，李亮. 基于滑动面应力假设下的三维边坡稳定性极限平衡法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 189-196.
[15]	刘振平，杨波，刘建，贺怀建，. 基于GRASS GIS与TIN滑动面的边坡三维极限平衡方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 221-228.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed