›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 1007-1014.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

低应力区岩石变形记忆效应形成机制及失忆性

王海军1, 2,汤 雷1,任旭华3,杨安玉3,牛 岩3   

  1. 1. 南京水利科学研究院 材料结构研究所,南京 210029;2. 西澳大学 土木与资源工程学院,珀斯 澳大利亚 6009; 3. 河海大学 水利水电工程学院,南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-17 出版日期:2014-04-10 发布日期:2014-04-18
  • 作者简介:王海军,男,1985年生,博士,工程师,主要从事地下结构工程、岩石力学、基桩检测方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    江苏省2010普通高校研究生科研创新计划(No. CX10B_215Z);国家自然科学基金(No. 51079087)。

Mechanism of rock deformation memory effect in low stress region and its memory fading

WANG Hai-jun1, 2,TANG Lei1,REN Xu-hua3,YANG An-yu3,NIU Yan3   

  1. 1. Materials and Structural Engineering Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China; 2. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, the University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia; 3. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
  • Received:2012-08-17 Online:2014-04-10 Published:2014-04-18

摘要: 地应力信息储存于开挖后的岩石中,变形率变化法(DRA)是基于岩石变形记忆效应测量地应力的方法,正确的机制是认识变形记忆效应与推广、改进DRA法的基础。传统推测的机制并不能解释低应力区存在变形记忆效应及失忆性等现象。首先进行火山沉积岩试样的物理试验,证明低应力区仍然存在变形记忆效应,记忆信息可同时采用侧向应变及轴向应变测量,两者精度一致。提出在低应力区,岩石变形记忆效应机制为微裂纹接触面及颗粒接触面的摩擦滑动。基于此机制,采用弹性元件、黏性元件和圣维南体构建相应的轴对称理论基本单元模型及多接触面理论模型。进行不同放置时间下的单轴循环压缩试验。结果表明,由轴对称理论模型可以得到低应力区岩石变形记忆效应、侧向DRA曲线与轴向DRA曲线准确度一致且在记忆信息处向上弯曲等、并对失忆性现象进行了初探。理论模型与物理试验结果一致,由此证明微裂纹接触面及颗粒接触面的摩擦滑动可以得到低应力区岩石变形记忆效应。同时,理论模型及物理试验结果为提高DRA法的测量准确度提供了依据。

关键词: 变形记忆效应, 变形率变化法, 地应力测量, 摩擦滑动, 失忆性

Abstract: The information of the in situ stress is stored in the rocks after excavation. The deformation rate analysis (DRA) method is used to determine the in situ stress based on the rock deformation memory effect(DME). Cracks generation and propagation under the previous load was initially assumed to be the mechanism of the rock DME. However, this mechanism can not explain many phenomena in the rock DME. The lack of a theoretical model prevents the correct interpretation of experimental data and improvements of the DRA method. The physical experiment is firstly performed on a volcanic sediment sample. It is showed that the in situ stress in the low stress region can be determined by both the axial strain and the lateral strain, while the DRA curves by these two kinds of strain are same. Then, the frictional sliding over the crack interfaces and grain boundaries in rocks are proposed as the mechanism of the rock DME in the low stress region. Based on this mechanism, a theoretical model using elastic element viscous element and St. Venant bodies is constructed. Cyclic compressions with different peak stresses and delay time are performed on the theoretical model. Results show that, not only the formation of the rock DME is well explained but also many DME phenomena are observed, such as the memory fading and the accuracy of the DRA curve by the lateral strain as the same as the axial strain. All the results by the theoretical model are in accordance with the experimental results. By the theoretical model, the frictional sliding over the crack interfaces and grain boundaries is verified to be the mechanism for the rock DME in the low stress region. Moreover, the results by theoretical model provided a basis for the improvement of the DRA method in the determination of the in situ stress.

Key words: deformation memory effect (DME), deformation rate analysis (DRA), in situ stress determination, frictional sliding, memory fading

中图分类号: 

  • TD 313
[1] 王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[2] 宋义敏, 邓琳琳, 吕祥锋, 许海亮, 赵泽鑫, . 岩石摩擦滑动变形演化及声发射特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2899-2906.
[3] 钟 山,江 权,冯夏庭,刘继光,李邵军,邱士利,吴世勇,. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
[4] 王成虎,邢博瑞,. 原生裂隙水压致裂原地应力测量的理论与实践新进展[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1289-1297.
[5] 朱元广 ,刘泉声 ,蒋景东 ,薛俊华,. 三向压力盒的嵌入效应及其应力测量特性模拟[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2728-2736.
[6] 钟 振 ,胡云进 , . 石灰岩裂隙摩擦滑动特性试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3085-3093.
[7] 张 鹏 ,秦向辉 ,丰成君 ,孙炜锋 ,谭成轩 . 郯庐断裂带山东段深孔地应力测量及其现今活动性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2329-2336.
[8] 丰成君,陈群策,谭成轩,吴满路,秦向辉. 广东核电站地应力测量及其应用[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1745-1752.
[9] 韩文梅 ,康天合 . 微凸体对抛光岩石表面静摩擦系数影响试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 674-678.
[10] 张重远 ,吴满路 ,廖椿庭 . 金川三矿地应力测量及应力状态特征研究[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3254-3260.
[11] 刘泉声,刘恺德. 淮南矿区深部地应力场特征研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2089-2096.
[12] 康红普,林 健,张 晓,吴拥政. 潞安矿区井下地应力测量及分布规律研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 827-831.
[13] 王成虎,郭啟良,丁立丰,刘立鹏. 工程区高地应力判据研究及实例分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2359-2364.
[14] 张百红 ,韩立军 ,韩贵雷 ,王延宁 . 深部三维地应力实测与巷道稳定性研究[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2547-2550.
[15] 沈海超,程远方,王京印,赵益忠,张建国. 断层扰动下地应力场三维有限元约束优化反演[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 359-365.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] 胡大伟,周 辉,谢守益,张 凯,邵建富,冯夏庭. 大理岩破坏阶段Biot系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3727 -3732 .
[3] 师旭超,韩 阳. 卸荷作用下软黏土回弹吸水试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 732 -736 .
[4] 朱建明,彭新坡,姚仰平,徐金海. SMP准则在计算煤柱极限强度中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2987 -2990 .
[5] 原喜忠,李 宁,赵秀云,杨银涛. 东北多年冻土地区地基承载力对气候变化敏感性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[6] 白 冰,李小春,石 露,唐礼忠. 弹塑性应力-应变曲线的斜率恒等式及其验证和应用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3789 -3792 .
[7] 唐利民. 地基沉降预测模型的正则化算法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[8] 李占海,朱万成,冯夏庭,李绍军,周 辉,陈炳瑞. 侧压力系数对马蹄形隧道损伤破坏的影响研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 434 -441 .
[9] 蔡辉腾,危福泉,蔡宗文. 重庆主城区粉质黏土动力特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[10] 宋 玲 ,刘奉银 ,李 宁 . 旋压入土式静力触探机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .