三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 1123-1130.

三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析

卢书强^{1, 2, 3}，易庆林^{1, 3}，易武^{1, 2}，黄海峰^{1, 2}，张国栋^{1, 2, 3}

1. 三峡地区地质灾害与生态环境湖北省协同创新中心，湖北宜昌 443002；2. 湖北长江三峡滑坡国家野外科学观测研究站，湖北宜昌 443002；3. 湖北省地质灾害防治工程技术研究中心，湖北宜昌 443002

收稿日期:2014-01-26 出版日期:2014-04-10 发布日期:2014-04-18
作者简介:卢书强，男，1973年生，博士，副教授，主要从事地质工程方面的教学、科研工作。
基金资助:
湖北省自然科学基金(No. 2012FFA040，No. 2012FFB03804)；湖北省教育厅科学技术研究项目(No. D20121304)；地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室开放基金(No. SKLGP2012K032)

Analysis of deformation and failure mechanism of Shuping landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area

LU Shu-qiang^{1, 2, 3}，YI Qing-lin^{1, 3}，YI Wu^{1, 2}，HUANG Hai-feng^{1, 2}，ZHANG Guo-dong^{1, 2, 3}

1. Collaborative Innovation Center for Geo-hazards and Eco-Environment in Three Gorges Area of Hubei Province, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. National Field Observation and Research Station of Landslides in Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Yangtze River, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. Hubei Engineering Research Center of Geological Hazards Prevention, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China

Received:2014-01-26 Online:2014-04-10 Published:2014-04-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 树坪滑坡自2003年三峡水库蓄水以来，就一直持续变形。为了对其稳定性及变形发展趋势进行评价和预测，有必要对其变形失稳机制进行深入研究。为此，采用现场地质调查和勘探的方法确定了滑坡的形态和性质；充分挖掘变形监测数据，详细分析了滑坡的变形特征。在此基础上，深入研究了变形失稳机制及影响因素，并对滑坡的稳定性进行了计算和预测。结果表明，滑坡区地形、岩性及地质构造等地质因素控制了树坪滑坡的形成和发展；库水位下降和大气降雨进一步激励了滑坡的变形。库水位下降，坡体内地下水位随之下降，但其速度远小于库水位下降速度，导致坡体内水力梯度和渗透力明显增大，从而使滑坡稳定性急剧下降，并且库水位下降速度越快，滑坡的位移速率也越大，是典型的水库下降型滑坡。在库水位下降过程中，若出现明显的降雨过程，更加剧了滑坡的变形，有产生大规模滑动的可能性，须采取防护治理措施。

关键词: 三峡库区, 树坪滑坡, 变形特征, 失稳机制, 稳定性预测

Abstract: Continuous deformation happened in Shuping landslide, since the impoundment of the Three Gorges reservoir from 2003. It is necessary to study the deformation and failure mechanism of Shuping landslide, in order to evaluate and predict the stability of landslide. The field geological survey and exploration are used to determine the form and property. The deformation characteristics of the landslide are analyzed in detail to make full use of monitoring data. The deformation mechanism and influence factors of landslide are studied based on investigation and monitoring; and the stability of landslide is calculated and predicted. Survey and analysis results show that, the geological factors, included topography, lithology and geological structure, control the deformation. The reservoir water fluctuation and rainfall trigger the deformation of Shuping landslide. Indeed, the relationship between slope groundwater fluctuation and reservoir water fluctuation primarily affected the deformation, especially during the decline process of slope groundwater with the drawdown of reservoir water. Because decline speed of groundwater is much slower than that of reservoir water, it increases the hydraulic gradient and seepage force in the landslide body apparently, and then reduces the slope stability, increases the landslide deformation rate especially when the sharp decline of reservoir water level. In addition, if the long-term or intensive rainfall occurs during the drawdown of reservoir water, more obvious deformation will happen and landslide might be failed. So the engineering control measures should be carried out.

Key words: Three Gorges reservoir area, Shuping landslide, deformation characteristics, failure mechanism, stability prediction

中图分类号:

TU 443

卢书强，易庆林，易武，黄海峰，张国栋 , . 三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1123-1130.

LU Shu-qiang ，YI Qing-lin ，YI Wu ，HUANG Hai-feng ，ZHANG Guo-dong , . Analysis of deformation and failure mechanism of Shuping landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1123-1130.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[2]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[3]	张宜虎, 邬爱清, 周火明, 王帅, 罗荣, 范雷. 悬索桥隧道锚承载能力和变形特征研究综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3576-3584.
[4]	刘健, 朱赵辉, 吴浩, 张石磊, 王晋明, . 超大型地下洞室高边墙围岩变形影响特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4030-4040.
[5]	巨能攀, 邓天鑫, 李龙起, 蒋金阳, 张陈羊. 强震作用下陡倾顺层斜坡倾倒变形机制离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 99-108.
[6]	王文沛, 李滨, 冯振, 张博文, 高杨, . 考虑场地效应的高陡岩质斜坡地震失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 297-304.
[7]	董志宏, 钮新强, 丁秀丽, 翁永红, 黄书岭, 裴启涛, 张练, . 乌东德左岸地下厂房洞室群施工期围岩变形特征及反馈分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 326-336.
[8]	杨琪，张友谊，刘华强，秦华，. 一种气泡轻质土路基受载-破坏模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3121-3129.
[9]	翟明磊，郭保华，李冰洋，焦峰,. 岩石节理分级剪切加载-蠕变-卸载的能量与变形特征[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2865-2872.
[10]	王春, 唐礼忠, 程露萍, 陈源, 刘涛, 韦永恒, . 高轴压和围压共同作用下矽卡岩受频繁动态扰动时的动力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4537-4546.
[11]	张强勇，张龙云，向文，江力宇，丁炎志,. 考虑温度效应的片麻状花岗岩三轴蠕变试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2507-2514.
[12]	安鹏，张爱军，邢义川，倪万魁，张博,. 伊犁深厚湿陷性黄土浸水入渗及沉降变形特征分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 557-564.
[13]	彭帅，张希巍，冯夏庭，蔡明, . 等向压缩及偏压加载下锦屏大理岩变形特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3532-3539.
[14]	邓冬梅，梁烨，王亮清，王昌硕，孙自豪，王聪，董曼曼. 基于集合经验模态分解与支持向量机回归的位移预测方法：以三峡库区滑坡为例[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3660-3669.
[15]	丁王飞，周云涛, . 三峡库区蓄水期间类土质岸坡断裂解体机制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 197-204.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed