›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1303-1310.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解研究

张玉国1,孙 敏1,谢康和2   

  1. 1.中原工学院 建筑工程学院,郑州 450007;2.浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,杭州 310027
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-28 出版日期:2014-05-10 发布日期:2014-06-09
  • 作者简介:张玉国,男,1973年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程和地下工程等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. U1204511);河南省教育厅自然科学研究项目(No. 2008A560016);河南省基础与前沿技术研究(No. 112300410286)

Study of simplifying solution to consolidation of composite ground with partially penetrated granular columns

ZHANG Yu-guo1, SUN Min1, XIE Kang-he2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450007, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
  • Received:2013-01-28 Online:2014-05-10 Published:2014-06-09

摘要: 利用平均固结度普遍解,将未打穿散体材料桩复合地基转化为等效双层地基,推导出未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解,给出其平均固结度计算简化公式。根据简化解、现有解和有限单元法编制程序,绘制考虑贯入比、桩体渗透系数、土体扰动区渗透系数和土体扰动区影响因子等因素对固结的影响曲线图,分析了各因素对未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结性状的影响,并对3种计算方法所求出的平均固结度进行了比较研究,进而探讨了简化解的适用性。研究结果表明,无论是在单面排水还是在双面排水条件下,简化解求出的平均固结度总体上是介于现有解和有限单元法二者之间,尤其在固结过程的“中后期”(即固结度≥50%时)。从实用角度来看,简化解的计算结果具有足够精度,且简便、实用;在各种影响因素中,散体材料桩长度和桩体渗透系数对固结过程的影响最大。

关键词: 散体材料桩复合地基, 未打穿, 等效双层地基, 平均固结度, 解析解

Abstract: A composite ground with partially penetrated granular columns is turned into a equivalent-double-layered ground on the basis of the general solution of the average degree of consolidation; and its simplifying analytical solution of 1D consolidation is worked out; furthermore, the simplifying formula of the average degree of consolidation is gained. Based on this solution, the present existing solutions and finite element method, these relevant programs are programmed. The consolidation process is investigated and the relevant results are prepared in graph forms which considering the influence of some factors including penetration ratio, permeability coefficient of a granular column, permeability coefficient of disturbed soil and impact factor of disturbed zone. The influence of various factors on the consolidation behavior of composite ground with partially penetrated granular columns is analyzed; and the comparative study of the average consolidation degrees by the three calculation methods is carried out; and then the applicability of the simplifying solution is discussed. The research results show that, the average consolidation degree of the simplifying solution under single-sided drainage or double-sided drainage conditions is between the ones of the existing solutions and the finite element method; and especially in the middle-latter of the consolidation process (≥50% degree of consolidation), the results of the simplifying solution meet the engineering precision requirements; and it is simple, and practical; and in the various influencing factors, both length and permeability coefficient of granular column have the most effects on the consolidation process.

Key words: composite ground with granular columns, partial penetration, equivalent-double-layered ground, average degree of consolidation, analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[2] 蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[3] 张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压 竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[4] 夏才初, 刘宇鹏, 吴福宝, 徐 晨, 邓云纲, . 基于西原模型的圆形隧道黏弹-黏塑性解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1638-1648.
[5] 信亚雯, 周志芳, 马 筠, 李鸣威, 陈 朦, 汪 姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[6] 蒙宇涵, 陈征, 冯健雪, 李红坡, 梅国雄, . 初始孔压非均布下一维地基砂垫层优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4793-4800.
[7] 黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[8] 吴 纲,孙红月,付崔伟,陈永珍,汤碧辉,. 软土虹吸排水完整井非稳定流模型及解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3355-3361.
[9] 吉恩跃,朱俊高,余 挺,金 伟,. 橡皮膜嵌入解析解及试验验证[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2780-2786.
[10] 夏长青,胡安峰,崔 军,吕文晓,谢康和, . 饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2858-2864.
[11] 张丙强, 王启云, 卢晓颖, . 软土地层浅埋圆形隧道非达西渗流场解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4377-4384.
[12] 汪 磊,李林忠,徐永福,夏小和,孙德安,. 半透水边界下分数阶黏弹性饱和土一维固结特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4142-4148.
[13] 胡之锋,陈 健,邱岳峰,李健斌,周兴涛, . 挡墙水平变位诱发地表沉降的显式解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4165-4175.
[14] 李传勋,王 素. 软土一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3548-3554.
[15] 张 浩,石名磊,郭院成,李永辉,. 边载作用下桥梁基桩-立柱的位移特征与受力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2683-2692.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋 晶,王 清,孙 铁,李晓茹,张中琼,焦志亮. 吹填土自重沉淤阶段孔隙水压力消散的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2935 -2940 .
[2] 陈正汉,方祥位,朱元青,秦 冰,魏学温,姚志华. 膨胀土和黄土的细观结构及其演化规律研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 1 -11 .
[3] 夏力农,雷 鸣,聂重军. 桩顶荷载对负摩阻力性状影响的现场试验[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 664 -668 .
[4] 叶为民,黄 伟,陈 宝,郁 陈,王 驹. 双电层理论与高庙子膨润土的体变特征[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 1899 -1903 .
[5] 王吉亮,陈剑平,杨 静,阙金声. 岩爆等级判定的距离判别分析方法及应用[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2203 -2208 .
[6] 陈 明,卢文波,周创兵,罗 忆. 初始地应力对隧洞开挖爆生裂隙区的影响研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2254 -2258 .
[7] 胡云世,苏 辉,成怡冲,艾智勇. 层状可压缩岩基三维固结问题的状态空间解[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 176 -180 .
[8] 张 红 ,郑颖人 ,杨 臻 ,王谦源 ,葛苏鸣. 黄土隧洞支护结构设计方法探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 473 -478 .
[9] 陈建功 ,周陶陶 ,张永兴. 深部洞室围岩分区破裂化的冲击破坏机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2629 -2634 .
[10] 陈旭光 ,张强勇 ,段 抗 ,刘德军 ,张 宁 . 基于光栅传感的模型测量系统应用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1409 -1415 .