基坑底分层回弹量的实用计算方法

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1413-1420.

基坑底分层回弹量的实用计算方法

杨建民^{1, 2}，李嘉¹

1.天津大学建筑工程学院，天津 300072；2.天津大学滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室，天津 300072

收稿日期:2013-01-30 出版日期:2014-05-10 发布日期:2014-06-09
作者简介:杨建民，男，1979年生，博士，副教授，从事地下工程水力学教学与科研工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No. 50908160）；教育部高校博士点新教师基金（No. 20090032120051）；天津大学自主创新基金

A practical method for calculating layerwise rebound at the bottom of foundation pit

YANG Jian-min^{1, 2}, LI Jia¹

1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2013-01-30 Online:2014-05-10 Published:2014-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基坑开挖后的卸载会引起基坑的回弹，基坑开挖越深，则回弹量越大，较大回弹量会造成各种工程问题。现有回弹量计算方法需要进行专门的回弹试验或特定应力路径试验以确定回弹计算所需的模量。为了避免进行专门试验，特研究了应用常规试验所得模量与常用Mindlin解和Boussinesq解相结合，得到一种计算回弹量的简便可行方法。通过对Mindlin解和Boussinesq解计算所得应力，与e- 模型和Duncan-Chang模型的变形计算方法进行组合，得到4种计算方法，然后应用分层总和法计算求解基坑的回弹量，通过与实测值对比，比较4种组合计算方法的精度，得出更适合于工程实际应用的、准确性更高的基坑回弹量计算方法。经3个工程实例检验，推荐采用Mindlin解和e- 模型分别计算应力和模量，再应用分层总和法累加变形量，可得到与工程实测值非常相近的坑底总回弹量和坑底分层回弹量。

关键词: 基坑回弹, 分层总和法, Mindlin解, Boussinesq解, e- 模型, Duncan-Chang模型

Abstract: Excavation of the pit will cause the rebound, the deeper the excavation is, the greater the rebound will be; the large amount of rebound will cause a variety of engineering problems. Existing rebound calculation methods require specialized rebound experiment or a particular stress path experiment to determine the unloading modulus. The application of modulus obtained from conventional laboratory tests and commonly used Mindlin solution and Boussinesq solution combined in a simple and practical way to get the rebound is studied in this paper. Four calculation methods for different combinations between the stress calculation of the Mindlin solution and Boussinesq solution and the deformation calculation of e- model and Duncan-Chang model, are obtained; and then the amount of rebound is calculated by the application of the layerwise summation method; and the accuracies of four methods are explored respectively. A more practical method for the application of engineering excavation rebound calculation is obtained. Compared with the measured values, the Mindlin solution and e- model are recommended respectively to calculate the stress and modulus; and then a calculated rebound which is very accurate to the measured values can be obtained with the application of the layerwise summation method.

Key words: foundation pit rebound, layerwise summation method, Mindlin solution, Boussinesq solution, e- model, Duncan-Chang model

中图分类号:

TU 470+.3

杨建民，李嘉，. 基坑底分层回弹量的实用计算方法[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1413-1420.

YANG Jian-min , LI Jia，. A practical method for calculating layerwise rebound at the bottom of foundation pit[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1413-1420.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	谭国宏, 肖海珠, 杜勋, 胡文军. 大跨度公铁合建斜拉桥主塔沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1113-1120.
[2]	魏纲，姜鑫，张鑫海，金睿，. 地面出入式盾构法隧道施工引起的土体垂直变形[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 993-1001.
[3]	周锦强，王树英，阳军生，傅金阳，. 基于Mindlin解分析隧道开挖对近邻桩基的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1075-1081.
[4]	周平槐1, 2，杨学林1. 考虑开挖卸荷影响的桩侧摩阻力等效计算方法[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2953-2960.
[5]	张琼方，林存刚，丁智，夏唐代，单华峰 , . 盾构近距离下穿引起已建地铁隧道纵向变形理论研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 568-572.
[6]	董城，冷伍明，李志勇，邹静蓉，. 重复荷载作用下粉性路基土累积塑性变形研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3437-3442.
[7]	杨泽飞，魏纲，林磊磊，张世民. 盾构法隧道施工工后横向地表总沉降研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 338-343.
[8]	陈继彬，赵其华，彭社琴，陈子扬. 不同方式处理后软土地基侧向变形规律[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 340-347.
[9]	王洪新 . 考虑三维变形的柔性和刚性基础沉降计算方法[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 1874-1880.
[10]	林存刚吴世明张忠苗刘俊伟李宗梁 . 盾构掘进速度及非正常停机对地面沉降的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2472-2482.
[11]	童立元，涂启柱，刘松玉，杜广印. 基于孔压静力触探测试的改进分层总和法在软基沉降预测中的应用研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 679-682.
[12]	魏焕卫，宋丰波，杨敏，孙剑平. 基于明德林解的土钉内力计算方法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 6-14.
[13]	杨光华，王俊辉. 地基非线性沉降计算原状土切线模量法的推广和应用[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 33-37.
[14]	陈林靖，戴自航，刘志伟. 考虑K0固结的软土基坑工程三维非线性有限元分析[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3796-3804.
[15]	张兵，高玉峰. 堆石料应力-应变关系的拟合方法研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2342-2346.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed