拱坝联合坝肩岩体三维计算模型构建

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1455-1460.

拱坝联合坝肩岩体三维计算模型构建

沈辉¹，罗先启¹，郑安兴¹，毕金锋¹，翁永红²

1.上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院，上海 200240；2.长江水利委员会长江勘测规划设计研究院，武汉 430010

收稿日期:2013-01-25 出版日期:2014-05-10 发布日期:2014-06-09
通讯作者: 罗先启，男，1965年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土工程相关的教学与研究工作。E-mail：luoxianqi@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail:shenhui.sjtu@gmail.com
作者简介:沈辉，男，1979年生，博士，主要从事岩土力学试验及数值模拟研究方面的工作。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目（No. 2011CB013505）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 51279100）。

Three-dimensional modeling for numerical simulation of arch dam abutment rock mass structures

SHEN Hui¹, LUO Xian-qi¹, ZHENG An-xing¹, BI Jin-feng¹, WENG Yong-hong²

1. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan 430010, China

Received:2013-01-25 Online:2014-05-10 Published:2014-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 坝址区复杂的地质条件与岩体力学环境变化，直接影响坝肩岩体抗滑稳定及拱坝的安全。我国西南乌东德超高拱坝坝址区工程地质条件极为复杂。坝体载荷后，区域内地层岩性、断层构造、岩溶系统、拱座内不连续裂隙等自然地质条件，成为影响坝肩岩体稳定性的主要因素。基于可研阶段地质勘探数据、二维地质剖面和工程设计数据，采用面向对象技术、多种软件协同作业，建立自然地质条件和工程对象的几何模型。构建适用于地应力反演分析，坝体载荷、工程开挖等因素影响下坝肩稳定性分析的三维精细有限元计算模型。该三维模型最大程度地模拟了工程岩体复杂结构，为高拱坝坝肩岩体稳定性综合分析提供良好的基础。计算结果表明：河谷两侧近地表地应力带及河床深部地应力区应力水平与实际量测值接近。坝肩槽开挖完成后，右岸拱肩槽800 m高程附近位移值最大达到12.9 mm。两岸9个可能滑动楔块在不同荷载组合条件下有一定差异，整体上左岸坝肩稳定性强于右岸。组合地震荷载作用下，所有楔块安全系数均大幅下降，但仍具有一定的安全裕度。

关键词: 岩土工程, 坝肩稳定, 数值模拟, 乌东德拱坝

Abstract: The complex geological conditions and rock mechanics environmental changes in the dam area directly affect the abutment stability of rock against sliding and the safety of arch dam. In Southwest China, the dam area of Wudongde ultra-high arch dam has extremely complex engineering geological conditions. After the dam is unloaded, the nature geological conditions become the main factors to affect the abutment stability, such as formation lithology, fault structures, karst system, skewback discontinuous fissures. Based on the geological exploration data, two-dimensional geological sections and engineering data of the feasibility study stage, the object-oriented technology, and a variety of collaboration software are used to establish a geometric model of the natural geological conditions and engineering objects. Finally, a three-dimensional fine finite element model which is suitable for the analysis of the abutment stability is built under the conditions of inversion analysis of ground stress, the dam load, exaction and so on. The three-dimensional fine finite element model simulates the complex structure of engineering largely, which provides a good foundation for the comprehensive analysis of the stability of high arch dam abutment rock. The results show that stress level of both the near-surface ground stress zone on both sides of the valley and deep ground stress zone of riverbed is close to the actual measured value. After the excavation of dam abutment is completed, the maximum displacement reaches 12.9 mm near the right bank of 800 m elevation of spandrel groove. There are some differences in the 9 sliding blocks under the different loading combination conditions; and the stability of the left abutment is stronger than that of the right on the whole. Under the combinations of seismic loads, all safety factors of the wedges will reduce largely; but there is still some margin of safety.

Key words: geotechnical engineering, dam abutment stability, numerical simulation, Wudongde arch dam

中图分类号:

TV 37

沈辉，罗先启，郑安兴，毕金锋，翁永红，. 拱坝联合坝肩岩体三维计算模型构建[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1455-1460.

SHEN Hui , LUO Xian-qi , ZHENG An-xing , BI Jin-feng , WENG Yong-hong，. Three-dimensional modeling for numerical simulation of arch dam abutment rock mass structures[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1455-1460.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[5]	刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[6]	金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[7]	韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[8]	吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[9]	吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[10]	孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[11]	穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘旸, 刘泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[12]	金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[13]	张聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[14]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 蒙伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[15]	李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张彬, 张嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed