持续蒸发作用下膨胀土裂隙和湿热特性室内模型试验

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S1): 141-148.

持续蒸发作用下膨胀土裂隙和湿热特性室内模型试验

李雄威¹，王爱军¹，王勇²，王继果³，李书进¹

1. 常州工学院常州市建设工程结构与材料性能研究重点实验室，江苏常州 213002； 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071；3. 三江学院土木工程学院，南京 210012

收稿日期:2013-10-30 出版日期:2014-06-10 发布日期:2014-06-20
作者简介:李雄威，男，1976年生，博士，副教授，从事非饱和土力学、特殊土灾害预警和防治技术等方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助（No.41102229；江苏省自然科学基金资助(No.BK20131141)；住房和城乡建设部科学技术项目资助(No.2012-k3-10)；江苏省“青蓝工程”资助(2012年)。

Laboratory model test on fissure development and moisture-heat behavior of expansive soil under action of continuous evaporation

LI Xiong-wei¹，WANG Ai-jun¹，WANG Yong²，WANG Ji-guo³，LI Shu-jin¹

1. Changzhou Key Laboratory of Structure Engineering and Material Properties, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China

Received:2013-10-30 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以广西白色强膨胀土为研究对象，对有、无植被覆盖和农膜覆盖的膨胀土分别进行30 d持续蒸发试验，研究持续蒸发过程对膨胀土湿热和裂隙拓展特性的影响。结果表明，无植被覆盖时表层土体脱湿量及脱湿速率分别为7.38%和0.17%/d，植被覆盖时分别为5.29%和0.07%/d，显然植被覆盖的脱湿量和脱湿速率均小于无植被覆盖的，而农膜覆盖土体蒸发受到遏制，水分无散失；无植被覆盖和农膜覆盖土体平均温度变化分别是7.36 ℃和9.72 ℃，比植被覆盖的2.03 ℃大5～ 8 ℃，可见植被覆盖降低了土体温度变化幅度；无植被覆盖土体裂隙深度达32 cm，与湿热影响深度28 cm较接近；植被覆盖和农膜覆盖土体平面及竖向均无出现明显裂隙，植被覆盖和蒸发受到遏制的状态可阻止土体裂隙开展。

关键词: 膨胀土, 裂隙, 湿热, 大气作用, 植被

Abstract: Talking the strong expansive soil of Guangxi as research object. 30 days evaporation experiment was respectively carried out for expansive soil with on without vegetation cover and under plastic sheeting cover, to explore the influence of continuous evaporation process on moisture-heat behavior and fissures development. The results show that without vegetation cover, the surface soil amount and rate of volumetric water content changes respectively are 7.38% and 0.17%/d; with vegetation cover, which are respectively 5.29% and 0.07%/d; apparently under vegetation cover, whose dehydration content and drying rate were less than that of without vegetation cover. For plastic sheeting cover, expansive soil evaporation is curbed and no water loss. Without no vegetation and plastic sheeting cover, the average temperature changes of expansive soil are 7.36 ℃，9.72 ℃ respectively, which is 5-8 ℃ higher than that with vegetation cover 2.03℃; obviously, the vegetation cover reduces expansive soil temperature variation. Without vegetation cover, expansive soil fissure depth is up to 32 cm, which is closer to 28 cm influence depth of moisture-heat. Under vegetation and plastic sheeting cover, no apparent fissure carried out in the plane and vertical; vegetation cover and the state of evaporation curbed can prevent expansive soil fissure developing.

Key words: expansive soil, fissure, moisture-heart, atmosphere action, vegetation

中图分类号:

TU443

李雄威，王爱军，王勇，王继果，李书进，. 持续蒸发作用下膨胀土裂隙和湿热特性室内模型试验[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 141-148.

LI Xiong-wei ，WANG Ai-jun ，WANG Yong ，WANG Ji-guo ，LI Shu-jin，. Laboratory model test on fissure development and moisture-heat behavior of expansive soil under action of continuous evaporation[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 141-148.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[2]	翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[3]	支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[4]	谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[5]	刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[6]	吴美苏, 周成, 王林, 谭昌明, . 根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 519-526.
[7]	赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[8]	陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 闫宪洋, . 黏土岩饱和过程中水分运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3327-3334.
[9]	李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[10]	陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[11]	李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[12]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[13]	王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[14]	张天军, 庞明坤, 蒋兴科, 彭文清, 纪翔, . 负压对抽采钻孔孔周煤体瓦斯渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2517-2524.
[15]	王辰霖, 张小东, 杜志刚, . 循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2140-2153.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed