考虑涂抹区压缩及渗透系数变化的堆载预压固结解

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1607-1616.

考虑涂抹区压缩及渗透系数变化的堆载预压固结解

许波^{1, 2, 3}，雷国辉^{1, 2}，郑强^{1, 2}，刘加才⁴

1. 河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室，南京 210098；2. 河海大学岩土工程科学研究所，南京 210098； 3. 香港华艺设计顾问（深圳）有限公司南京分公司，南京 210037；4. 南京工业大学交通科学与工程学院，南京 210009

收稿日期:2013-03-08 出版日期:2014-06-10 发布日期:2014-06-20
通讯作者: 雷国辉，男，1972年生，博士，教授，主要从事土力学与地基基础工程教学与科研工作。E-mail: leiguohui@hhu.edu.cn E-mail:xb32268024@163.com
作者简介:许波，男，1987年生，硕士，工程师，主要从事软土地基处理方面的研究与设计工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目资助（No.51278171）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助（No.2011B02814）；2010年度江苏省高校青蓝工程项目资助。

Solution of consolidation by surcharge preloading considering compressibility and varying hydraulic conductivities in smear zone

XU Bo^{1, 2, 3}, LEI Guo-hui^{1, 2}, ZHENG Qiang^{1, 2}, LIU Jia-cai⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. Nanjing Branch of Hong Kong Huayi Design Consultants (Shenzhen) Company, Nanjing 210037, China; 4. College of Transportation Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China

Received:2013-03-08 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为评估涂抹区土体压缩和渗透系数变化对含竖向排水体地基固结的影响，采用等体积应变假设，考虑涂抹区土体的压缩变形及其水平向渗透系数沿径向分别呈线性和抛物线分布，并考虑井阻作用以及地基附加球应力沿深度任意分布，推导了随时间线性堆载预压条件下固结微分方程的显式解析解答，分析了涂抹区半径、水平向渗透系数的分布模式、以及体积压缩系数对地基整体平均固结度的影响。结果表明，涂抹区土体采用均匀折减的水平向渗透系数明显低估了地基的固结速率，而当涂抹区半径较大时，不考虑涂抹区土体的压缩变形将会高估地基的固结速率。在含竖向排水体地基固结问题的分析中，这些影响不可忽视。

关键词: 竖向排水体, 随时间线性加载, 涂抹, 井阻, 超静孔压, 固结度

Abstract: An explicit analytical solution of the partial differential equations of consolidation by vertical drains is derived to assess the effects of compressibility and varying hydraulic conductivities of soils in the smear zone on ground consolidation. Equal volumetric strain assumption is adopted. The compressive deformation of soils in the smear zone is considered, together with a linear and a parabolic distribution of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity along the radial direction. Well resistance is also considered, together with an arbitrarily distributed mean stress increasing along the depth of ground. The solution is derived for the consolidation under a linearly time-varied surcharge preloading. The proposed solution is used to analyze the influences of the radius of smear zone, the distribution of horizontal hydraulic conductivity and the coefficient of volumetric compressibility of smeared soils on the global average degree of consolidation. It is found that the rate of ground consolidation is underestimated by the solution derived by applying a uniformly reduced horizontal hydraulic conductivity to the smeared soils. When the radius of smear zone is relatively large, the rate of ground consolidation is overestimated by the solution derived without consideration of the compressive deformation of the smeared soils. These effects should not be overlooked in the analysis of consolidation by vertical drains.

Key words: vertical drain, linear loading with time, smear, well resistance, excess pore water pressure, consolidation degree

中图分类号:

TU 472.3+3

许波，雷国辉，郑强，刘加才,. 考虑涂抹区压缩及渗透系数变化的堆载预压固结解[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1607-1616.

XU Bo , LEI Guo-hui , ZHENG Qiang , LIU Jia-cai,. Solution of consolidation by surcharge preloading considering compressibility and varying hydraulic conductivities in smear zone[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1607-1616.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[2]	黄朝煊，王正中，方咏来,. 考虑漏气及井阻非线性的真空预压地基固结解析解[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2574-2582.
[3]	刘勇，戚蓝，李少明，郭浩洋，. 考虑变井阻和涂抹效应的真空预压三维有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1517-1523.
[4]	刘忠玉，杨强. 基于分数阶Kelvin模型的饱和黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3680-3687.
[5]	李赞，雷国辉，付崔伟, . 砂墙地基二维固结自由应变解[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1613-1622.
[6]	黄勇，王军，梅国雄 , . 透水管桩加速超静孔压消散的单桩模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2893-2899.
[7]	周小鹏，梅国雄，. 考虑固结的透水管桩沉桩全过程有限元模拟[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 676-682.
[8]	汪洪星，杨春和，陈锋，冒海军,. 软土抗剪强度指标随固结度变化规律分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 106-112.
[9]	张玉国，孙敏，谢康和,. 未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1303-1310.
[10]	陈伟志，蒋关鲁，王智猛，李安洪,. 分级连续加载条件下原状膨胀土固结变形研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 710-716.
[11]	魏新江，张涛，丁智，王常晶，蒋吉清,. 地铁荷载下不同固结度软黏土的孔压试验模型[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2761-2768.
[12]	张福海，陈雷，郭帅杰，任朋勋 , . 底部抽真空预压法砂井地基固结解析解[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2787-2793.
[13]	仇玉良，丁洲祥 . 一维小变形主、次固结耦合理论模型分析[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1957-1964.
[14]	丁洲祥，仇玉良，李涛. 双面排水非线性固结超静孔压的非对称性解析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1829-1838.
[15]	邹新军，杨眉，赵明华. 变荷载下考虑三维渗流的未打穿砂井地基固结分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 127-131.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed