›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1671-1678.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

路堤挡墙与预应力管桩连接方法现场试验研究

李国维1, 2,苏建斌2,贺冠军3,马鹏真4   

  1. 1.河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,南京 210098;2.河海大学 道路与铁道工程研究所,南京 210098; 3.河海大学 岩土工程科学研究所,南京 210098;4.上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院,上海 200093
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-21 出版日期:2014-06-10 发布日期:2014-06-20
  • 作者简介:李国维,男,1964年生,博士,研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事软基路堤变形和高边坡稳定性方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    广东省交通运输厅科技计划项目(No. 2011-02-021)

Field test research on method for connecting embankment retaining wall and prestressed pipe piles

LI Guo-wei1, 2, SU Jian-bin2, HE Guan-jun3, MA Peng-zhen4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Highway and Railway Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China, 3. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 4. School of Enviroment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
  • Received:2013-10-21 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-20

摘要: 采用预应力管桩(PHC)作为路基挡土墙基础,可发挥PHC桩质量保证率高、抗压性能好的优势,挡土墙承担水平荷载的要求也给PHC桩基础与基底的连接模式提出了问题。依托广东广清高速公路扩建工程进行现场试验,研究PHC桩基础分别采用有盖板的垫层式和无盖板的嵌入式承连挡土墙基底模式的作用机制。研究表明:垫层式与嵌入式连接的PHC基础桩间土均承担主要荷载,嵌入式连接外桩与桩间土应力比更大,是垫层式两倍左右,嵌入式内、外桩承载力发挥率差别更加明显;垫层式连接基础不能阻止墙体发生偏转,嵌入式连接通过桩体的约束作用控制墙体保持位置状态稳定;垫层式与嵌入式连接的挡墙受力主要表现为底板底面沿路基方向承受拉应力,在垂直路基方向底板底面未出现零压力区;两种连接模式墙体水平位移差别不大,桩间土是承担水平荷载的主体。

关键词: 挡土墙, PHC管桩, 垫层式, 嵌入式, 连接模式

Abstract: The advantage of high quality assurance rate and good compression resistance of PHC pipe pile can be exploited by using them in the foundation of retaining wall of embankments. It puts forward a new research about the connection mode between PHC pile and retaining wall base. Based on in-situ tests in Guang-Qing Expressway extension project, the mechanism of the connection between the base of retaining wall and PHC pile is studied. Two connecting mechanisms, one with cover plate, called the cushion type and the other without cover plate, called embedded type, are studied. The research suggests that both cushion type and embedded connection between PHC pile foundation soil bear the main load, embedded links between pile and pile soil stress are larger, which are about twice of the cushion type, bearing capacity rate difference of inside and outside the pile for embedded type is more apparently. Deflection of the retaining wall cannot be prevented with the cushion type connecting mechanism, as opposite to the embedded type, in which the wall can be kept in a stable state by the constraint resulting from the piles. For both connecting types, the base of the retaining wall bears tension force along the embankment direction and non zero-compression zones exist in this surface. There is very little difference in horizontal displacement for two connecting types, and the horizontal load is mainly carried by the soils around the piles.

Key words: retaining wall, PHC pipe pile, cushion type, embedded type, connection mode

中图分类号: 

  • TU 476+.4
[1] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[2] 张晓曦, 何思明, 樊晓一, . L型挡土墙滑裂面确定方法与地震稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[3] 吴建涛, 叶 霄, 李国维, 蒋 超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[4] 李兆华,胡 杰,冯吉利,龚文俊. 基于黏弹塑性本构模型的泥石流数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[5] 杨山奇,卢坤林,史克宝,赵瀚天,陈一鸣,. 刚性挡土墙后三维被动滑裂面的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3303-3312.
[6] 李 泽,刘 毅,周 宇,王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[7] 陈祖煜,黎康平,李 旭,詹成明,. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定容许安全系数取值标准初探[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 1-10.
[8] 杨 贵,王阳阳,刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[9] 刘忠玉,陈 捷,李东阳,. 考虑剪应力作用的刚性挡土墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2443-2450.
[10] 陈祖煜 ,詹成明 ,姚海林 ,陈立宏 ,李 旭,. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定分析安全判据和标准[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2129-2137.
[11] 施 峰 ,郝世龙 , . PHC管桩水平承载力试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 617-622.
[12] 王仕传,孙本杰,邵 艳. 改进的主动土压力计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1375-1379.
[13] 娄培杰,. 黏性土填料下考虑土拱效应的非极限主动土压力计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 988-994.
[14] 侯景军 ,何 俊 ,汤正俊 ,刘俊新 ,谭万元,. 软土基坑中内插H型钢重力式挡土墙支护的变形及稳定性的有限元研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 431-436.
[15] 周晓龙 ,马 亢 ,钱 明 ,刘德稳 ,赵 琦,. 黏性土填料下考虑土拱效应的挡土墙被动土压力计算[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 245-250.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535 -540 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[6] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[7] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[8] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[9] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .