›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1818-1824.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

多地貌单元复合场地非线性地震效应特征二维分析

金丹丹1, 2,陈国兴1, 2,董菲蕃1, 2   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,南京210009;2. 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,南京210009
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-01 出版日期:2014-06-10 发布日期:2014-06-20
  • 作者简介:金丹丹,女,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事场地地震效应的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划“地震预警与烈度速报系统的研究与示范应用”项目(No.2009BAK55B00)。

2D analysis of nonlinear seismic effect characteristics of multi-geomorphic composite site

JIN Dan-dan1, 2,CHEN Guo-xing1, 2,DONG Fei-fan1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2013-03-01 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-20

摘要: 针对由河漫滩、阶地、波状起伏的丘陵地带和残丘等组成的典型复合地形场地,基于ABAQUS软件的显式有限元并行计算集群平台,考虑土体的非线性特征,采用黏弹性人工边界模拟切除的无限域对地震波动的影响,建立了大尺度复合地形真实场地的二维有限元模型,并将基岩地震动视为SH波,分析了不同地貌单元复合场地地震效应特征。结果表明:地形差异引起地表各测点峰值加速度(PGA)及峰值位移(PGD)不同;在相同地震波入射下,河漫滩区地表PGA大于Ⅰ级阶地区域,但其PGD明显小于Ⅰ级阶地区域,且河漫滩区的峰值位移差动较小;场地地表水平加速度反应谱呈双峰及多峰现象,加速度在0.4~1.2 Hz频段放大较多,且加速度反应谱特性与输入地震动相关;特定频段(0.5~1.75 Hz)地震动放大效应与聚集效应比较明显,频率小于0.2 Hz及大于2 Hz时,场地地震动放大特征不显著。低丘区的敏感频率段宽于河漫滩区;观测点的位置影响相应的水平加速度持时大小,局部地形变化将引起地震动持时差异,且持时和输入地震动特性相关。

关键词: 复合地形场地, 不同地貌单元, 土体非线性, 地震效应特征

Abstract: Based on the explicit finite element method and 32 CPU parallel computing cluster platform of ABAQUS, considering the heterogeneity of ground soils, a large-scale refined two-dimensional finite element nonlinear analytical model for a multi-geomorphic composite site that consists of alluvial flat,terraces,undulating hilly terrain and monadnock is established in the time domain. The SH wave is taken as the bedrock earthquake motion and nonlinear seismic effect characteristics of the composite site are analyzed. The results show that: (1) the peak ground acceleration(PGA) and peak ground displacement(PGD) of different observation points on the ground surface vary with each other, which is caused by the terrain differences. When it’s under the same input ground motion, the ground surface PGA of alluvial flat area shows obviously larger than that of the first terrace area, however, the PGD of alluvial flat is smaller than that of the first terrace, and the PGD difference is relatively smaller in the alluvial flat area. (2) The horizontal acceleration response spectrum of ground surface appears a double-peak or multi-peak phenomenon, the amplification of ground motion seems outstanding in the frequency band from 0.4 Hz to 1.2 Hz. Moreover, the acceleration response spectrum is related with the input ground motion. (3) The amplification effect and focusing effect of seismic motion are more obvious in specific frequency band(0.5 Hz to 1.75 Hz), when the frequency is lower than 0.2 Hz or higher than 2 Hz, the seismic amplification characteristics are not apparent. (4) The location of observation point has influence on the acceleration duration,the changing terrain may cause difference of seismic motion duration,besides,the motion duration, in some way, is dependent on the input ground motion characteristics.

Key words: composite site, multi-geomorphic unit, nonlinear characteristics of soil, seismic effect characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 475+.1
[1] 韩俊艳, 钟紫蓝, 李立云, 赵密, 万宁潭, 杜修力. 纵向非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性 地震反应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[2] 李海丽,张陈蓉,卢 恺,. 隧道开挖条件下地埋管线的非线性响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 289-296.
[3] 蔡燕燕 ,王 海 ,戚志博 ,关云飞,. 考虑土体非线性的CCSG桩复合地基固结解[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 639-645.
[4] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928-3933.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[2] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[3] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[4] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[5] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[6] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[7] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .
[8] 胡海军,蒋明镜,赵 涛,彭建兵,李 红. 制样方法对重塑黄土单轴抗拉强度影响的初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 196 -199 .
[9] 李 敏,柴寿喜,王晓燕,魏 丽. 以强度增长率评价麦秸秆加筋盐渍土的加筋效果[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1051 -1056 .
[10] 徐 冲,刘保国,刘开云,郭佳奇. 基于粒子群-高斯过程回归耦合算法的滑坡位移时序分析预测智能模型[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1669 -1675 .