强夯法在城市防洪工程地基加固中的应用研究

›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 490-494.

强夯法在城市防洪工程地基加固中的应用研究

张福海¹，王保田¹，刘汉龙¹，祝子泓²

1. 河海大学岩土工程研究所，江苏南京 210098；2. 宜宾市水利电力局，四川宜宾 644000

收稿日期:2002-11-29 出版日期:2004-03-10 发布日期:2014-07-15
作者简介:张福海，男，1970年生，讲师，从事岩土工程方面的研究。

Application of dynamic compaction to foundation improvement of a flood-prevention dam in Yibin

ZHANG Fu-hai ¹，WANG Bao-tian¹，LIU Han-long¹，ZHU Zi-hong²

1. Research Institute of Geotechincal Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China； 2. Yinbin Municipal Bureau of Water Resources and Hydropower , Yibin 644000, China

Received:2002-11-29 Online:2004-03-10 Published:2014-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对宜宾城市防洪工程中粉土地基强夯加固效果进行了检测，其结果表明：采用1 600 kN ? m夯击能，其有效加固深度大于6 m，地基土的干密度得到了明显增加，平均值从天然地基的1.48 g/cm3增加到强夯后的1.57 g/cm3，增幅达到6.1 %；粉土层的孔隙比平均值从0.852减小到0.724；地基土的压缩模量平均值从5.42 MPa提高到8.27 MPa；渗透系数算术平均值降低到天然地基的1/10以下，即从2.5×10-4 cm/s降低到3.5×10-6 cm/s；天然地基标准贯入击数有32.9 %小于5击，强夯以后，击数全部大于7击。粉土地基经过强夯处理，满足了防洪堤地基的承载力和渗透稳定要求，消除了7度地震液化势。

关键词: 强夯法, 效果检测, 承载力, 渗透稳定, 液化

Abstract: The testing results of dynamic compaction on a silty soil foundation of a flood-prevention dam in Yibin, Sichuan Province are introduced. The test data show that: the valid strengthened depth in the foundation is more than 6 meters at the compacting energy of 1 600 kN?m; the average dry density of the soils is increased from 1.48 g/cm3 to 1.57 g/cm3; the average void ratio is decreased from 0.852 at natural state to 0.724 after compaction; the average compression modulus is changed from 5.42 MPa to 8.27 MPa; the average permeability coefficient is decreased to the value of less than one-tenth of the natural state; the arithmetic average of permeability coefficients is reduced from 2.5×10-4cm/s to 3.5×10-6 cm/s; the N-values of SPT at natural state have 32.9 % less than 5 while all of them are more than 7 after compaction. The conclusion can be stated that the dynamic compaction method is suitable for the treatment of the silty soil foundation in the site of the foundation of flood control dam in Yibin. The ground can meet the requirement as the foundation of flood-prevention dam on capacity and seepage stability, as well as the liquefaction prevention at 7-degree earthquake.

Key words: dynamic compaction, field and laboratory test, bearing capacity, seepage stability, liquefaction

中图分类号:

TU 472

张福海，王保田，刘汉龙，祝子泓,. 强夯法在城市防洪工程地基加固中的应用研究[J]. , 2004, 25(3): 490-494.

ZHANG Fu-hai ，WANG Bao-tian ，LIU Han-long ，ZHU Zi-hong,. Application of dynamic compaction to foundation improvement of a flood-prevention dam in Yibin[J]. , 2004, 25(3): 490-494.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	汪俊敏, 熊勇林, 杨骐莱, 桑琴扬, 黄强. 不饱和土动弹塑性本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2323-2331.
[2]	邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[3]	李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[4]	庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[5]	徐强, 肖明, 陈俊涛, 倪少虎, . 渗流监测数据缺失处理与渗透稳定判断[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1526-1534.
[6]	魏星, 张昭, 王刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[7]	裴向军, 朱凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[8]	王宇飞, 刘润. 砂土中浅埋管道在竖向−水平荷载空间的承载力包络线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1129-1139.
[9]	许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 高畄成, 陈苏, 杜修力, . 地震动持时压缩比对可液化地基地震反应影响的振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 147-155.
[10]	王克忠, 金志豪, 杨麦珍, 刘先亮, 刘华, . 取水塔基坑开挖过程倒悬岩坎围堰渗透稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 415-422.
[11]	熊晓荣，汤华，廖明进，尹小涛，王东英, . 隧道锚“楔形效应”的室内模型试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 181-190.
[12]	宗钟凌，鲁先龙，李青松，. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[13]	王海波，吴琪，杨平,. 细粒含量对饱和砂类土液化强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2771-2779.
[14]	尹君凡，雷勇，陈秋南，刘一新，邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[15]	王小雯，张建民，李焯芬, . 波浪作用下饱和砂质海床土体与管线相互作用规律研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2499-2508.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed