›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 1229-1233.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

济南典型地区地基土污染腐蚀性质变异研究

李相然1,姚志祥2,曹振斌1   

  1. 1.烟台大学 土木工程系,山东 烟台 264005;2.南京大学 地球科学系,江苏 南京 210093
  • 收稿日期:2003-05-28 出版日期:2004-08-10 发布日期:2014-07-25
  • 作者简介:李相然,男,1963年生,教授,博士,烟台大学岩土工程研究所所长,主要从事工程地质、岩土工程、地下工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    中国冶金地勘总局资助项目——济南市环境岩土工程问题与防治技术开发(No.TM02H16)

Study on physical and mechanical property variation of polluted erosive foundation soils in typical district of Jinan

LI Xiang-ran1, YAO Zhi-xiang2, CAO Zhen-bin1   

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China; 2.Department of Earth Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • Received:2003-05-28 Online:2004-08-10 Published:2014-07-25

摘要: 随着城市化进程加快,济南市面临日益严重的环境岩土工程问题。以济南市典型地区的地基土为研究对象,在室内开展了水-土化学作用的物理力学效应实验,在现场对已经污染腐蚀的地基原状土样进行了物理力学性质实验。结果表明,地基土腐蚀后其物理力学性质有显著地变化。遭受污染腐蚀的地基土和无腐蚀的地基土相比,前者液塑限和压缩模量减小,液性指数和压缩系数增大。

关键词: 地基土腐蚀, 水-土化学作用, 物理力学效应

Abstract: Jinan is a famous city of history and culture, it is also the capital of Shandong province. It is faced serious environmental geotechnical problems day by day along with the quickening of urbanization course. The foundation soils in the typical district of Jinan city were taken as study object. Physical and mechanical effect experiment on chemical action of water on soil were done, undisturbed soil specimens from the polluted erosive foundation were taken, physical and mechanical property experiments were done. The result indicates that there is remarkable change for the physical and mechanical property after foundation soils were polluted. Compared with ordinary foundation soil, the polluted erosive foundation soil has smaller liquid limit, smaller plastic limit, smaller compressibility modulus; and larger liquidity index, larger compressibility factor.

Key words: foundation soil corrosion, chemical action of water on soil, physical and mechanical effect

中图分类号: 

  • TU 47
[1] 杨德欢,颜荣涛,韦昌富,张 敏,张 芹,. 粉质黏土强度指标的水化学敏感性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3529-3536.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 翟 伟,宋二祥. 移动荷载下瞬态振动的三维移动坐标有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2830 -2836 .
[2] 丁万涛,雷胜友. 加筋膨胀土不同布筋型式三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1147 -1150 .
[3] 符策简. 高含盐粉土的力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 193 -197 .
[4] 陈 峰,田利勇,卢伟华. 盾构隧道穿越苏州河对防汛墙的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3855 -3860 .
[5] 曲广周,张建明,程东幸. 青藏高原冻结粉质黏土直剪蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 95 -98 .
[6] 吕玺琳,黄茂松,钱建固. 真三轴状态下砂土的强度参数[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 981 -984 .
[7] 邹 猛,李建桥,刘国敏,张金换,李因武. 模拟月壤地面力学性质试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1057 -1061 .
[8] 陈新泽. 基于FLAC3D预应力锚拉桩作用机制和加固效果研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 499 -504 .
[9] 张 磊 ,龚晓南 ,俞建霖. 考虑土体屈服的纵横荷载单桩变形内力分析[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2441 -2445 .
[10] 魏明尧,王恩元,刘晓斐,王 超. 深部煤层卸压爆破防治冲击地压效果的数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2539 -2543 .