›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1545-1550.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

全风化花岗岩孔径分布-颗粒组成-矿物成分变化特征及指标相关性分析

尚彦军1,王思敬1,岳中琦2,胡瑞林1,涂新斌1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,北京100029; 2. 香港大学 土木工程系,香港
  • 收稿日期:2003-07-01 出版日期:2004-10-11 发布日期:2014-07-25
  • 作者简介:尚彦军,男,1967年生,博士,副研究员,从事水文地质工程地质科研工作。
  • 基金资助:

    香港大学边坡信息资讯中心资助研究项目(No. 1)

Variation features of pore radius and particle diameter distributions and mineral content of completely decomposed granite and correlation of parameters

SHANG Yan-jun1,WANG Si-jing1,YUE Zhong-qi2,HU Rui-lin1,TU Xin-bin1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Received:2003-07-01 Online:2004-10-11 Published:2014-07-25

摘要: 孔径分布、颗粒组成和矿物成分是全风化花岗岩微观和结构特征的3个主要方面,也是决定其工程地质性质的关键因素。理论研究和实际工程中,常用大、中小和微孔隙、角砾、砂粒和粉粘粒、三大矿物(石英、长石和粘土矿物)含量等指标表征这3方面的特征。3方面指标在一定范围上变化幅度多大?数值间相关性及作为土结构模型组份因子,它们相对权重多大?通过对香港九龙两处边坡51件全风化花岗岩试样压汞测试、颗粒分析和X射线衍射(XRD)等微观结构特征分析,结果表明:两处边坡粗粒和细粒结构全风化花岗岩有明显区别,前者主要属于砾石土和砂砾土,部分为含砾土,大孔隙多,石英和粘土矿物多,而后者部分属含砾土,部分为细砂土和亚砂土,微孔隙多,长石多;两者长石和粘土矿物含量变化正好相反。借助于多因素关系矩阵法,对3方面共9个指标作相关分析发现,相关性较好的指标是:角砾和砂粒 (0.948);大孔隙和微孔隙(0.846);石英和长石(0.827);长石和粘土矿物 (0.747)。从土结构因子角度考虑,权重从大到小指标是:微孔隙、长石、粘土矿物、砂粒、角砾、大孔隙、中小孔隙、粉粘粒和石英。其分析结果可为该类土微观结构特征细化及分类提供依据,为其微结构力学研究提供基础材料。

关键词: 孔径, 粒径, 矿物成分, 微观特征, 全风化花岗岩, 相关系数

Abstract: The three aspects with respect to micro-properties of the completely decomposed granite (CDG) as the distribution of pore radius, particle diameters and mineral content play a major role in determining the engineering geological features of the CDG. In theoretical study and engineering practice the following parameters are used to describe the characteristics in the three aspects: large, middle and small, micro-pores, gravel, sand, silt and clay particles, three major mineral components (quartz, feldspar and clay minerals), etc. How large of the variation range of these indices in one certain size of trial pits and blocks? How about the correlation of the indices in the three parts? As factors of soil structure, how large of their weight ratios once the soil structure is to be under considerations? In this paper, a total of 51 nos. specimens from 18 nos. blocks from three trial pits of two slopes in Kowloon, Hong Kong, were taken as examples. The test is carried out by means of the mercury injection, particle size distribution and X-ray diffraction. After preliminary analysis, it is found that the CDG with coarse particle portions is very different from that with fine particle portions. The former belongs to gravel soil and sandy gravel soil, and some of it is gravel-bearing soil, with more big pores, more quartz and clay minerals. The latter belongs to gravel-bearing soil, some is fine sandy soil and sub-sandy soil, with more micropores, more feldspars. Variations of feldspar and clay mineral contents are inverse to each other. Furthermore, the interaction matrix is applied for analysis of the correlation of the 9 indices. As a result, it is found that the correlation coefficient varies to a great extent. According to the value of the correlation coefficient, those indices with larger ones are: gravel and sand particles (0.948), big pores and middle-small pores (0.846), quartz and feldspar (0.827), feldspar and clay minerals (0.747). If the soil structure factors are under considerations, the 9 indices are in sequence of weight ratio from large to small: micro-pores, feldspar, clay minerals, sandy particles, gravel, large pores, middle-small pores, silt and clay particles, quartz. These indices, quantified after their correlations and weight ratios, provide bases for the study of micro-features in detail and classifications of the CDG, and perhaps act as one of the basement for the constitution equations of microstructure mechanics of soils to be built.

Key words: pore radius, particle diameter, mineral content, micro-properties, completely decomposed granite, correlation coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TU452
[1] 吴 琼, 王晓晗, 唐辉明, 刘超远, 姜耀飞, 徐艳君, . 巴东组易滑地层异性层面剪切特性 及水致劣化规律研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1881-1889.
[2] 高青鹏, 曹 平, 王 飞, 王 柱. 压剪作用下多节理类岩试样力学性质及破坏判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1013-1022.
[3] 谌文武, 张起勇, 刘宏伟, . SH固土剂在遗址土中的渗透注浆扩散规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 429-435.
[4] 陶高梁, 朱学良, 胡其志, 庄心善, 何 俊, 陈 银. 黏性土压缩过程临界孔径现象及固有分形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 81-90.
[5] 吕擎峰, 周 刚, 王生新, 霍振升, 马 博, . 固化盐渍土核磁共振微观特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 245-249.
[6] 刘一飞, 郑东生, 杨 兵, 祝 兵, 孙明祥. 粒径及级配特性对土体渗透系数影响的细观模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 403-412.
[7] 王 军, 胡惠丽, 刘飞禹, 蔡袁强, . 粒孔比对筋土界面直剪特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 115-122.
[8] 陈 磊, 赵学胜, 汤益先, 张 红, . 结合InSAR的幂指数Knothe模型参数拟合与评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 423-431.
[9] 郭林坪,孔令伟,徐 超,杨爱武,. 厦门花岗岩残积土物理力学指标关联性定量表征初探[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 175-180.
[10] 张 帆,胡 维,郭翰群,胡大伟,盛 谦,邵建富,. 热处理后花岗岩纳米压痕试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 235-243.
[11] 刘星志,刘小文,陈 铭,谷明晗. 基于3个不等粒径颗粒接触模型的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 651-656.
[12] 杨 斌,徐曾和,杨天鸿,杨 鑫,师文豪, . 高水力梯度条件下颗粒堆积型多孔介质渗流规律试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4017-4024.
[13] 孙德安,何家浩,高 游. 广吸力范围内压实红黏土的强度特性[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 51-56.
[14] 吴 琪,陈国兴,朱雨萌,周正龙,凌道盛,. 砂–粉混合料阈值细粒含量的确定[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 107-115.
[15] 陈 波,孙德安,高 游,李 健,. 上海软黏土的孔径分布试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2523-2530.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,冯 兴,黄 祥,李春亮. UH模型在有限元分析中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 237 -245 .
[2] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[3] 马 强,郑俊杰,张 军,赵冬安. 高填方涵洞减载机制与数值分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 424 -429 .
[4] 刘泉声,胡云华,刘 滨. 基于试验的花岗岩渐进破坏本构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 289 -296 .
[5] 辛海丽,孙其诚,刘建国,金 峰. 刚性块体压入颗粒体系时的受力及力链演变[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 88 -92 .
[6] 杜延军,范日东. 改性土-膨润土竖向隔离墙材料的压缩及渗透特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 49 -54 .
[7] 周 扬,周国庆. 土体一维冻结问题温度场半解析解[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 309 -0313 .
[8] 陈保国 ,孙金山 ,张 磊. 上埋式钢筋混凝土拱涵受力特性及地基处理研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1500 -1506 .
[9] 霍军帅,陈 焘,宫全美,周顺华. 复杂周边条件下异形基坑承压水抽水试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 268 -273 .
[10] 陈国良 ,张勇慧 ,盛 谦 ,刘修国. 基于地理信息系统的公路边坡三维建模及可视化研究[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3393 -3398 .