降雨蒸发作用下膨胀土湿热和裂隙特性室内模拟试验

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2473-2478.

降雨蒸发作用下膨胀土湿热和裂隙特性室内模拟试验

李雄威¹，王爱军¹，王勇²

1.常州工学院常州市建设工程结构与材料性能研究重点实验室，江苏常州 213002； 2.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071

收稿日期:2013-06-02 出版日期:2014-09-10 发布日期:2014-09-16
作者简介:李雄威，男，1976年生，博士，副教授，主要从事非饱和土力学、特殊土的灾害预测与防治以及桩土共同作用方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No. 41102229）；江苏省自然科学基金项目（No. BK20131141）；住房和城乡建设部科学技术项目（No. 2012-k3-10）；江苏省“青蓝工程”；江苏省地质矿产局科研项目（No. 2014-ky-4）

Laboratory model test on moisture-heat and fissure behavior of expansive soil under action of rainfall and evaporation

LI Xiong-wei¹, WANG Ai-jun¹, WANG Yong²

1. Changzhou Key Laboratory of Structure Engineering and Material Properties, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2013-06-02 Online:2014-09-10 Published:2014-09-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以广西白色强膨胀土为研究对象，对有、无植被覆盖的膨胀土样进行蒸发、降雨再蒸发试验，研究降雨、蒸发过程对膨胀土湿热和裂隙拓展特性的影响。结果表明，植被覆盖土样表面的反射量比无植被覆盖土样小100 W/m2左右，土样表面温差小5～6 ℃。无植被覆盖土样经历降雨过程后，在相同蒸发条件下，土样表面裂隙率由1.28%增加到3.82%，表层土体累计脱湿量由3.42%增加到11.17%，脱湿速率由0.59%/d增加到1.44%/d，表层土体温度变化平均值由13.1 ℃增加到14.9 ℃。可见，降雨、蒸发过程使得土体水量变化加大，水分迁移速率增加，温度变化加剧，土体趋于破碎。植被覆盖土样经历降雨过程后，在相同蒸发条件下，土样表面并未出现明显裂隙，表层土体累计脱湿量由3.16%变为2.36%，脱湿速率由0.58%/d变为0.37%/d，表层土体温度变化平均值由0.58 ℃变为0.37 ℃。可见，短期降雨、蒸发过程对植被覆盖下膨胀土的持水能力影响不大。

关键词: 膨胀土, 裂隙, 湿热, 大气作用, 植被

Abstract: Taking the white strong expansive soil of Guangxi as the research object. Laboratory model test for evaporation- rainfall-evaporation is respectively carried out for expansive soil with vegetation covered or not, to explore the influence of rainfall and evaporation process on moisture-heat behavior and fissures development. The results show that, the values of radiation and surface temperature of soil sample with vegetation covered are smaller than the ones of soil sample without vegetation covered about 100 W/m2, 5-6 ℃ respectively. After rainfall process and under same evaporation conditions, the surface fissure ratio of soil samples without vegetation covered increases from 1.28% to 3.82%. Moisture content changes of surface soil increase from 3.42% to 11.17%. Drying rate of surface soil increases from 0.59%/d to 1.44%/d. The average temperature changes of surface soil increase from 13.1℃ to 14.9 ℃. Thus it can be seen, rainfall and evaporation process makes the changes of moisture content, temperature, and moisture migration rate increased. Soils tended to be broken. After rainfall process and under same evaporation conditions, obvious fissures in soil sample with vegetation covered don’t appear. Moisture content of surface soil changes from 3.16% to 2.36%. The drying rate of surface soil changes from 0.58%/d to 0.37%/d. The average temperature variation of surface soil changes from 0.58 ℃ to 0.37 ℃. Obviously, short-term rainfall and evaporation process has a low influence on the moisture holding capacity of expansive soil with vegetation covered.

Key words: expansive soil, fissure, moisture-heat, atmosphere action, vegetation

中图分类号:

TU 443

李雄威，王爱军，王勇,. 降雨蒸发作用下膨胀土湿热和裂隙特性室内模拟试验[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2473-2478.

LI Xiong-wei , WANG Ai-jun , WANG Yong,. Laboratory model test on moisture-heat and fissure behavior of expansive soil under action of rainfall and evaporation[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2473-2478.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[2]	翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[3]	支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[4]	谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[5]	刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[6]	吴美苏, 周成, 王林, 谭昌明, . 根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 519-526.
[7]	赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[8]	陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 闫宪洋, . 黏土岩饱和过程中水分运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3327-3334.
[9]	李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[10]	陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[11]	李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[12]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[13]	王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[14]	张天军, 庞明坤, 蒋兴科, 彭文清, 纪翔, . 负压对抽采钻孔孔周煤体瓦斯渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2517-2524.
[15]	王辰霖, 张小东, 杜志刚, . 循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2140-2153.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed