考虑基础刚度影响的风机梁板式桩筏基础模型试验研究

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2875-2880.

考虑基础刚度影响的风机梁板式桩筏基础模型试验研究

李婉^{1, 2}，木林隆^{1, 2}，连柯楠^{1, 2}

1. 同济大学岩土与地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海200092；2. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092

收稿日期:2014-06-04 出版日期:2014-10-11 发布日期:2014-10-27
通讯作者: 木林隆，男，1984年生，讲师，主要从事岩土力学与岩土工程的研究工作。E-mail: mulinlong@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介:李婉，女，1989年生，硕士研究生，主要从事岩土工程研究工作。
基金资助:
国家973计划课题(No. 2013CB036304)；国家自然科学基金(No. 51208378)。

Model test on piled beam-slab raft foundation for wind turbines considering raft rigidity

LI Wan^{1, 2}，MU Lin-long^{1, 2}，LIAN Ke-nan^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2014-06-04 Online:2014-10-11 Published:2014-10-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 梁板式桩筏基础作为新型风机基础，前景广阔，适当优化结构，可节约成本。采用大型室内模型试验，研究了梁板式桩筏基础在不同筏板刚度情况下的受力变形特性，同时讨论了桩土荷载分担比的关系。研究表明，在工作荷载范围内，适当增大筏板刚度，桩平均轴力增加，外圈桩承担的荷载增大，内圈桩的轴力减小，环梁及肋梁弯矩减小，但继续增加刚度，对桩身轴力、环梁弯矩、肋梁弯矩的影响并不大；随着荷载的增大，土体承担的荷载比逐步增大，趋于稳值。随着梁板式基础刚度增加，基础内外差异沉降减少，但是达到一定刚度后再增加刚度对变形影响较小。梁板式基础刚度的变化会影响基底反力分布的均匀性，且存在一个最优刚度，使基础底部反力分布最为均匀，本次试验中12梁的梁板式基础基底反力比6梁和实体基础更均匀。桩基的分布和梁的分布存在相互影响，改变梁的分布会影响桩顶力，而桩基在梁底下又会使梁的应力产生重新分布。研究成果可为设计桩筏基础提供参考依据。

关键词: 桩筏基础, 模型试验, 筏板刚度, 承载特性

Abstract: As a new foundation for wind turbine on land, piled beam-slab foundation has a broad prospect .The optimized structures properly can reduce costs. To investigate the bearing and deformation characteristics of piled beam-slab foundation under vertical loads under different raft rigidities, a large-scale model test is carried out, which also research the ratio of the force carried by pile and that carried by soil. The research shows that within the range of work load, average pile axial force increases with the increase of the raft rigidity; the axial force of the outer-ring-piles increases while the axial force of inner-ring-piles reduces. The moment of the ring beam and the ribbed beam decrease when the rigidity continues to increase after a certain value, there is little effect on axial force, moment of the ring beam and ribbed beam. With the increase of the stiffness of the beam-slab foundation, the differential settlement of the foundation decreases. However, this trend will become insignificant as the stiffness increases to a certain value. The variety of rigidity of the piled beam-slab foundation could make a difference on the uniformity of subgrade reaction. Besides, there is an optimal stiffness that can make the foundation reaction distribution most uniform. In the experiment, the subgrade reaction distribution of the piled-beam-slab foundation with 12 beams is more uniform comparing to the foundation with 6 piles and block foundation. And there is an optimal rigidity for piled beam-slab foundation, which makes the soil beneath the foundation beared more loads while piles do less. The distribution of piles and beams produces mutual effects on each other. When the distribution of beams changes, the forces of the pile top will be affected. And piles under the beams will also result in beam stress redistribution. In actual project, the rigidity of caps should be optimized and the research results can provide reference for the design of piled beam-slab foundation.

Key words: piled raft foundation, model test, raft rigidity, bearing characteristic

中图分类号:

TU 473

李婉，木林隆，连柯楠 , . 考虑基础刚度影响的风机梁板式桩筏基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2875-2880.

LI Wan ，MU Lin-long ，LIAN Ke-nan , . Model test on piled beam-slab raft foundation for wind turbines considering raft rigidity [J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2875-2880.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[3]	覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[4]	于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[5]	谢芸菲, 迟世春, 周雄雄, . 复杂环境中大规模桩筏基础的优化设计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 486-493.
[6]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[7]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[8]	王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[9]	陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[10]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[11]	卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[12]	杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[13]	蔡雨, 徐林荣, 周德泉, 邓超, 冯晨曦, . 自平衡与传统静载试桩法模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3011-3018.
[14]	孙飞, 张志强, 易志伟. 正断层黏滑错动对地铁隧道结构影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3037-3044.
[15]	詹良通, 胡英涛, 刘小川, 陈捷, 王瀚霖, 朱斌, 陈云敏. 非饱和黄土地基降雨入渗离心模型试验及多物理量联合监测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2478-2486.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed