›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 129-134.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种非饱和土表层蒸发过程的预测方法

张 华1,胡文龙1,陈善雄2   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-03 出版日期:2014-10-31 发布日期:2014-11-12
  • 作者简介:张华,男,1974年生,博士,副教授,主要从事非饱和土渗流,屋顶绿化材料水分运移研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51178251)。

A method for predicting evaporation process in unsaturated soil surface

ZHANG Hua1,HU Wen-long1,CHEN Shan-xiong2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Education Ministry, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2014-01-03 Online:2014-10-31 Published:2014-11-12

摘要: 探索了一种由土壤基本物性指标、气象数据预测非饱和土表层蒸发过程的方法。通过土壤基本物理性质(颗粒分布、土粒相对密度、干密度)预测出土-水特征曲线(SWCC),进而得到土壤气相对湿度与含水率的关系,采用Penman-Wilson模型预测出了非饱和土表面的蒸发曲线。通过该方法,只需实地采取土样,获取其基本物理性质,由任意时刻土壤的含水率及气象数据就能预测出该时刻土表的蒸发速率。采用自制的自动蒸发测量系统进行浅层土蒸发试验,得到了蒸发曲线,与预测结果进行比较发现预测蒸发过程与实测结果一样皆由临界含水率和风干含水率将其分为3个阶段:稳定阶段、减速阶段和残余阶段,且蒸发量吻合,证明了所提出方法的准确性和实用性,对工程界估计土表蒸发量,确定水流量边界有重要意义。

关键词: 预测方法, 土-水特征曲线, Penman-Wilson模型, 蒸发试验

Abstract: A method for predicting evaporation process in unsaturated soil surface is presented based on physical properties of soil and meteorological data. The soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) is estimated by physical properties of soil (i.e. particle size distribution, specific gravity and dry density). Then, the relationship between relative humidity of soil surface and water content is obtained based on the SWCC. Finally, the Penman-Wilson model is applied to predict evaporation curve of unsaturated soil surface. In this method, only in situ soil physical properties and meteorological data are needed to get the predicted evaporation curve. The evaporation rate of soil surface can be obtained with given water content at that time. Laboratory evaporation tests of thin layer soils are conducted in a designed evaporation measuring system. The measured evaporation curves are compared with those predicted. The results show that the measured and prediction evaporation curves have same processes and slight difference in evaporation rate. Three evaporation stages, i.e. stable rate stage, reducing rate stage and residual stage, are evidently shown in both observed and predicted curves. The stages are divided by as called critical moisture content and air-dried moisture content. The suggested method is accurate and practical for engineers to predict unsaturated soil surface evaporation rate and determine the boundary flux.

Key words: predicting method, soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC), Penman-Wilson model, evaporation tests

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[2] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[3] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[4] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[5] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
[6] 陶高梁,李 进,庄心善,肖衡林,崔惜琳,徐维生. 利用土中水分蒸发特性和微观孔隙分布规律确定SWCC残余含水率[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1256-1262.
[7] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[8] 陶高梁,柏 亮,袁 波,甘世朝. 土-水特征曲线与核磁共振曲线的关系[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 943-948.
[9] 黎澄生,孔令伟,柏 巍,安 然,李甜果, . 土-水特征曲线滞后阻塞模型[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 598-604.
[10] 刘星志,刘小文,陈 铭,谷明晗. 基于3个不等粒径颗粒接触模型的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 651-656.
[11] 方瑾瑾,冯以鑫,邵生俊,. 真三轴条件下原状Q3黄土的土-水特征[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2597-2604.
[12] 毕 骏,谌文武, . 参数m的形式和最大基质吸力点对Van Genuchten方程各参数的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[13] 黄启迪,赵成刚,蔡国庆,. 基于热力学并考虑体变及滞回效应的土-水特征曲线模型[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1857-1867.
[14] 曹春山 ,吴树仁 ,潘 懋,梁昌玉,. 工程切坡诱发黄土滑坡成因机制研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1049-1060.
[15] 李顺群,贾红晶,王杏杏,桂 超,. 轴平移技术在基质吸力测控中的局限性和误差分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3089-3095.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 殷 杰,高玉峰,洪振舜. 连云港软黏土的不排水强度试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3297 -3301 .
[2] 陈绍杰,郭惟嘉,杨永杰. 煤岩蠕变模型与破坏特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2595 -2598 .
[3] 林刚,徐长节,蔡袁强. 不平衡堆载作用下深基坑开挖支护结构性状研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2592 -2598 .
[4] 穆彦虎,马 巍,孙志忠,刘永智. 青藏铁路块石路基冷却降温效果对比分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 284 -292 .
[5] 赵炼恒,罗 强,李 亮,杨 峰,但汉成. 层状岩体边坡动态稳定性拟静力上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3627 -3634 .
[6] 刘小丽,张丹丹,刘 凯,苏媛媛. 一种直剪式模型试验设备的设计及应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 475 -480 .
[7] 卢坤林,杨 扬. 考虑位移影响的主动土压力近似计算方法[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 553 -557 .
[8] 肖成志,孙建诚,李雨润,刘晓朋. 三维土工网垫植草护坡防坡面径流冲刷的机制分析[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 453 -458 .
[9] 苏立君,廖红建,殷建华. 土钉抗拔试验过程中钉周土体应力变化研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 124 -128 .
[10] 周万欢 ,殷建华. 上覆压力和剪胀作用下土钉抗拔的有限元模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 691 -0696 .