地铁车站深基坑桩锚支护结构内力试验研究

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 185-197.

地铁车站深基坑桩锚支护结构内力试验研究

杨校辉^{1, 2}，朱彦鹏^{1, 2}，郭楠^{1, 2}，黄雪峰^{1, 3}

1. 兰州理工大学土木工程学院，兰州 730050；2. 兰州理工大学西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心，兰州 730050； 3. 中国人民解放军后勤工程学院建筑工程系，重庆 401311

收稿日期:2014-06-03 出版日期:2014-10-31 发布日期:2014-11-12
作者简介:杨校辉，男，1986年生，男，博士研究生，主要从事非饱和土与特殊土地基处理、支挡结构等方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目（No. 2011BAK12B07）；教育部创新团队支持计划项目（No. 2013 IRT13068）。

Internal force test research on pile-anchor retaining structure of metro station deep foundation

YANG Xiao-hui^{1, 2}, ZHU Yan-peng^{1, 2}, GUO Nan^{1, 2}, HUANG Xue-feng^{1, 3}

1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; 2. Northwest Center for Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; 3. Department of Architectural Engineering, Logistical Engineering University of PLA, Chongqing 401311, China

Received:2014-06-03 Online:2014-10-31 Published:2014-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究深大复杂基坑桩锚支护结构内力演化规律和受荷特性，以总面积约为16×104 m2、最大开挖深度为26 m的基坑工程为依托，在支护桩和锚杆钢筋上预埋钢筋计，分别对基坑开挖过程中和桩头侧向加载、不同工况锚杆拉拔过程中桩的内力和锚杆内力进行监测。结果表明：（1）随着基坑的开挖，悬臂阶段3根支护桩外侧桩身应力呈拉-压-拉变化，内侧桩身应力呈压-拉变化；同一测点钢筋应力逐渐增大，最大值位置略微下移，应力零点出现的位置随桩长的不同而不同。单支点阶段随着基坑暴露时间的增加，外露桩身应力增大，桩身钢筋应力峰值出现在开挖面附近区域，嵌固段桩身应力变化复杂且应力零点比悬臂阶段出现的早。两支点阶段桩身钢筋应力变化更复杂，主要受基坑开挖时间和预应力锚杆的张拉锁定等因素的影响。（2）支护桩、锚杆支护结构设计需考虑其最大允许变形量；满足锚固长度临界值要求后，自由段越长，锚固效果越好，锚固段越短越经济。（3）在未施加拉力和不同拉力作用过程中，锚杆受力发生重分布，与以往土质或岩质基坑认识不同。（4）锚杆侧摩阻力中性点和潜在滑移面的出现与移动是一致的，可用于确定基坑潜在滑移面位置和锚杆临界长度。

关键词: 深基坑, 桩锚支护结构, 现场试验, 内力, 动态演化, 承载特性

Abstract: In order to study the evolution of internal force and the load characteristics on pile-anchor retaining structure of complex, large and deep foundation, based on the deep foundation of which the total area is about 160 000 m2 and the maximum excavation depth reaches 26 m, we have monitored the internal forces of the pile and anchor respectively in the process of foundation pit excavation, pile head with lateral loaded and different working conditions of the bolt drawing by embedded bar gauge on the retaining pile and anchor reinforcement. The results show that: (1) during the cantilever pile stage, as the foundation pit excavation the lateral pile body stress of three retaining piles presents “tension-compression-tension” and the inside pile body stress exhibits “compression-tension”. The same point stress increases. Max stress position moves down slightly. The stress-zero appearance varies depending on the length of pile. During single-fulcrum stage, along with increasing exposure time of foundation excavations, the exposed pile stress increases. The peak stress of pile appears in the near excavation area. Excavation of pile body stress tends to complex and the zero-stress point arise earlier than the cantilever pile stage. During two-fulcrum stage, pile’s reinforcing stress tends to be more complicated. Main reasons are that the excavation time of foundation excavations and the impact of factors such as tension locking of prestressed anchor. (2) structural bolting design needs to consider the maximum deformation; After meeting the threshold length of anchorage, the longer the free section, the better anchoring effect, the shorter anchoring section, the more economical. (3) without pulling force or during different tensile force, redistribution occurs in bolt stress, which is different from the those in soil or rock excavation. (4) the appearance and movement of the neutral point of lateral friction force in anchor arm are in consistence with those of the potential slip surface. Therefore, the location of slip surface and anchor arm threshold length in a deep excavation can be determined.

Key words: deep foundation, pile-anchor retaining structure, in-situ test, internal force, dynamic evolution, bearing behavior

中图分类号:

TU 47

杨校辉，朱彦鹏，郭楠，黄雪峰 , . 地铁车站深基坑桩锚支护结构内力试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 185-197.

YANG Xiao-hui , ZHU Yan-peng , GUO Nan , HUANG Xue-feng , . Internal force test research on pile-anchor retaining structure of metro station deep foundation[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 185-197.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[2]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[3]	陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[4]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[5]	吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[6]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[7]	谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[8]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[9]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[10]	信亚雯, 周志芳, 马筠, 李鸣威, 陈朦, 汪姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[11]	李驰, 王硕, 王燕星, 高瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[12]	唐德琪, 俞峰, 陈奕天, 刘念武, . 既有−新增排桩双层支挡结构开挖模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1039-1048.
[13]	任连伟, 孔纲强, 郝耀虎, 刘汉龙, . 基于能量桩现场试验的土体综合热导率系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4857-4864.
[14]	李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[15]	雷华阳, 刘广学, 周骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed