复杂地铁车站施工对邻近建筑物变形影响数值分析的位移叠加法

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 619-625.

复杂地铁车站施工对邻近建筑物变形影响数值分析的位移叠加法

徐帮树¹，丁万涛¹，刘林军²，晏勤¹，陈诚¹

1.山东大学岩土与结构工程研究中心，济南 250061；2.安徽省建筑科学研究设计院，合肥 230001

收稿日期:2014-04-01 出版日期:2014-10-31 发布日期:2014-11-12
作者简介:徐帮树，男，1974年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩土工程数值计算理论与工程应用方面研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No. 50820135907，No. 50909056)。

Displacement superposition method of numerical analysis for determining influence of complex metro station construction on deformation of adjacent buildings

XU Bang-shu¹, DING Wang-tao¹, LIU Lin-jun², YAN Qin¹, CHEN Cheng¹

1. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering，Shandong University，Jinan 250061, China； 2. Anhui Institute of Building Research & Design, Hefei 230001, China

Received:2014-04-01 Online:2014-10-31 Published:2014-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 换乘地铁车站基坑工程地下空间布局复杂，由垂直交叉的地铁车站基坑工程、联络通道、区间隧道等共同组成，通常采用数值模拟方法分析基坑施工对邻近建筑物的变形影响。由于空间结构复杂、基坑规模大，采用整体模型来模拟施工过程建模困难，网格数量多，单台微机难以完成。为了解决这个问题，在合肥市潜山路地铁车站的数值模拟计算中采用位移叠加法，把复杂的地铁基坑工程计算模型剖分为整体模型和一个局部模型，将整体模型计算的变形结果作为局部模型计算的初始位移场，在该基础上对局部模型进一步开挖模拟基坑工程施工对邻近建筑物的影响。以单元内插法和反距离加权插值法为例，通过两种方法导出整体模型的初始位移场，并将两种位移叠加法计算得到的结果与单独计算的结果进行对比。结果表明，采用位移叠加法得到的计算结果与单独计算得到的结果基本一致，可近似作为完整模型计算结果，证明了位移叠加法的可行性。通过比较可知，采用反距离加权插值法比单元内插法具有更高的精度，得到的计算结果更准确。研究结果对复杂基坑工程数值模拟计算有重要的参考和应用价值。

关键词: 地铁车站, 复杂基坑工程, 数值模拟, 位移叠加法

Abstract: Space distribution of foundation pit engineering for metro transfer station, which consists of vertically crossed station excavation, connected aisle and running tunnel, is complex. Numerical simulation method is usually used to analyze the construction impact of pit on adjacent buildings. Because of complicated structure and large excavation size, it is difficult to establish an integrated model to simulate construction process with single microcomputer; and numerical method does not work smoothly due to a large number of grids. In the numerical simulation of Qianshan Road metro station in Hefei, in order to overcome this problem, the complex metro foundation pit is divided into global model and one local model. The ultimate results of global model will be exported as a result of initial displacement field in local model; and then the local model is further excavated to study the influence of pit construction on neighboring buildings. Taking inverse distance weighted method and elementary interpolation method for examples, two kinds of initial displacement field of local model will be obtained by these two approaches. The calculating results of two methods are compared. It is shown that the results obtained by using displacement superposition method, which is consistent with the ones obtained by calculating separately, can used as the results of overall model approximately. The feasibility of displacement superposition method is verified. Comparing the inverse distance weighted with the elementary interpolation method, the former has a higher precision than the latter. The results play a guiding role in numerical simulation of complex foundation pit engineering.

Key words: metro station, complex foundation pit engineering, numerical simulation, displacement superposition

中图分类号:

U 291.69

徐帮树，丁万涛，刘林军，晏勤，陈诚，. 复杂地铁车站施工对邻近建筑物变形影响数值分析的位移叠加法[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 619-625.

XU Bang-shu , DING Wang-tao , LIU Lin-jun , YAN Qin , CHEN Cheng，. Displacement superposition method of numerical analysis for determining influence of complex metro station construction on deformation of adjacent buildings[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 619-625.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[5]	刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[6]	金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[7]	韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[8]	吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[9]	吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[10]	孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[11]	穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘旸, 刘泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[12]	金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[13]	张聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[14]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[15]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 蒙伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed