›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 3111-3116.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于中主应力修正关系的边坡稳定性分析

龚文俊1,曾立峰2,孙军杰3,李明永3   

  1. 1.北京航空航天大学 土木工程系,北京 10083;2.大连理工大学 工业装备结构分析国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024; 3.中国地震局 兰州地震研究所,兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-12 出版日期:2014-11-11 发布日期:2014-12-10
  • 作者简介:龚文俊,男,1985年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定方面研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51209186)。

Analysis of slope stability based on modified relationship of intermediate principal stress

GONG Wen-jun1, ZENG Li-feng2, SUN Jun-jie3, LI Ming-yong3   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China; 3. Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2014-06-12 Online:2014-11-11 Published:2014-12-10

摘要: 边坡稳定性分析时通常将应力条件简化为平面应变状态,采用三轴试验强度计算出的边坡稳定性偏于保守。在充分考虑中主应力物理含义及力学机制的基础上,将Mises屈服准则与Mohr-Coulomb(简称M-C)内切圆屈服准则进行匹配,得到了平面应变条件下土体屈服破坏时中主应力的理论修正关系,进而也得到了该条件下最大主应力与最小主应力的比值关系,从理论上证明了该比值关系是与土体平面应变破坏时内摩擦角成一定关系的常数,也在平面应变试验中得到了验证,从侧面反映出中主应力理论修正关系的合理性。由上述两种关系建立了土体平面应变破坏条件下的应力路径,结合Lade-Duncan强度准则,建立了平面应变条件下强度参数与三轴试验试验条件下强度参数转换公式,由该转换公式得到的平面应变条件下的强度参数与平面应变试验实测值误差在2%左右,大幅缩小了三轴试验实测值与平面应变试验实测值的误差。在均质边坡稳定分析中分别采用常规三轴试验强度值与由公式转换得到的平面应变强度值进行计算。研究结果表明,三轴试验条件下内摩擦角为10°~20°之间时,基于两种强度参数得出的安全系数相差不大;当三轴试验条件下内摩擦角大于20°时,平面应变条件下安全系数较三轴试验条件下提高19%左右,但该成果只在文中计算案例有效,两者误差的准确关系还有待于进一步研究。值得关注的是,由于平面应变条件下土体强度变大,边坡的临界滑面深度变浅了,其形态相应变陡。

关键词: 边坡, 安全系数, 中主应力, 平面应变, 三轴试验, 强度准则

Abstract: Usually, stress state of the soil is replaced by plane strain state when slope stability is analyzed, which leads to conservative results adopting triaxial tests. Based on fully considering the physical meanings and mechanisms of the intermediate principal stress, this paper proposes a modified relationship of intermediate principal stress in plane strain state when soil approaches ultimate strength making. Mises strength criterion identical to the circle internally tangent to M-C strength criterion, and we further derive the ratio of maximum principal stress to minor principal stress, which is a constant associated with internal frictional angle under plane strain state. The ratio has been proved by tests, which demonstrates the modified relationship of intermediate principal stress is reasonable. Based on the ratio and the modified relationship, the stress path under plane strain state is derived. Combined with Lade-Duncan strength criterion, the strength formula transformation between plane strain state and triaxial state is established. Then, comparisons between internal frictional angle derived from plane strain experiment and strength formula transformation show that the errors between the two frictional angle are only about 2%, which largely decrease the errors caused by triaxial test. Two different strength parameters, one of which is derived from triaxial test and another of which is derived from strength formula transformation, are used to evaluate the stability of a homogeneous slope. The results show that, when the internal friction angle in triaxial test state is between 10°-20°, the difference of safety factor based on the two different strength parameters is small; if it beyond 20°, the safety factor in plane strain state is about 19% larger than that under triaxial state. However, the results are only effective in this study, a further study is needed. Furthermore, the critical slip surface depth becomes shallower and shape becomes steeper with larger strength of soil under plane strain state.

Key words: slope, safety factor, intermediate principal stress, plane strain, triaxial test, strength criterion

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[2] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[3] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[4] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[5] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[6] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[7] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[8] 周家作, 韦昌富, 魏厚振, 杨周洁, 李力昕, 李彦龙, 丁根荣, . 多功能水合物沉积物三轴试验系统的研制与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 342-352.
[9] 高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[10] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[11] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[14] 姜谙男, 张权, 吴洪涛, 段龙梅, 焦明伟, 白涛, . 基于改进局部安全度的爆破作用边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[5] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[6] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[7] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[8] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[9] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[10] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .