›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 3129-3138.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粗粒土剪胀性大型三轴试验研究

姜景山1, 2,程展林2,左永振2,丁红顺2   

  1. 1.南京工程学院 建筑工程学院,南京 211167;2.长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-13 出版日期:2014-11-11 发布日期:2014-12-10
  • 作者简介:姜景山,男,1978年生,博士,讲师,主要从事粗粒土工程性质、地基和路基处理等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(No. CKWV2013205/KY);南京工程学院校级科研基金项目资助(No. YKJ201330)。

Dilatancy of coarse-grained soil in large-scale triaxial tests study

JIANG Jing-shan1, 2, CHENG Zhan-lin2, ZUO Yong-zhen2, DING Hong-shun2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
  • Received:2013-10-13 Online:2014-11-11 Published:2014-12-10

摘要: 剪胀性是土体显著区别于一般弹性材料的基本特性,与土体的强度和变形特性密切相关。通过4组不同初始密度的塔城砂砾石常规大型三轴试验,研究剪胀性对粗粒土强度和变形特性的影响。试验结果表明,(1)若体变速率(体变和轴向应变均以压缩为正)先从正值减小到负值并达到最小值,随后又有所增大但仍小于0,则应力-应变曲线为软化型,在比值为最小值时土体剪胀性最大,对应于峰值强度,若体变速率从某一正值单调减小并一直大于0,则应力-应变曲线为硬化型;(2)体变变化趋势取决于剪胀性和压缩性的大小,剪切后期若剪胀速率大于压缩速率,则体变先压缩后膨胀,应力-应变曲线呈软化型,反之若剪胀速率小于压缩速率,则体变一直是压缩的,应力-应变曲线呈硬化型。研究结果对于加深认识粗粒土的强度和变形特性具有重要意义。

关键词: 粗粒土, 三轴试验, 应力-应变关系, 剪胀性, 强度, 变形, Rowe剪胀方程

Abstract: Dilatancy is a basic behavior of soils which is closely related to strength and deformation behaviors of soils and makes soils significantly different from normal elastic materials. Four groups of large-scale triaxial tests were conducted to investigate the influence of dilatancy on strength and deformation behaviors of coarse-grained soils at different initial densities. The test results show that: (1) The stress-strain curve shows softening behavior if volumetric strain rate (the ratio of volumetric strain increment to axial strain increment, assume positive for volumetric strain and axial strain under compressed condition) firstly decreases from a positive value to a negative value and then increases but still smaller than zero; the dilatancy and strength of the soil reach maximum at the minimum value of the ratio, otherwise the stress-strain curve behaves as hardening behavior if the ratio of volumetric strain increment to axial strain increment decreases monotonously from a positive value but always larger than zero. (2) The variation trend of volumetric strain depends on dilatancy and compressibility of soils; the volumetric strain is firstly compressive and then dilatant and stress-strain curve behaves as stress softening form if dilatancy rate (the negative of the ratio of volumetric strain increment caused by shear stress to axial strain increment) is larger than compression rate (the ratio of volumetric strain increment caused by compression stress to axial strain increment) in the late shear stage; otherwise the volumetric strain is always compressive and the stress-strain curve behaves as hardening behavior for the condition that dilatancy rate is smaller than compression rate in the whole shear stage. It is of great importance to know the dilatancy of coarse-grained soils for insight into the strength and deformation behaviors of coarse-grained soils.

Key words: coarse-grained soil, triaxial test, stress-strain relation, dilatancy, strength, deformation, Rowe dilatancy equation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 宋义敏, 张 悦, 许海亮, 王亚飞, 贺志杰. 基于非均匀特征的岩石蠕滑与黏滑变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[2] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[3] 樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[4] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土 渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[5] 马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[6] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[7] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[8] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[9] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[10] 王峰, 张建清, . 考虑颗粒强度尺寸效应的原型堆石料破碎特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 87-94.
[11] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[12] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[13] 王忠凯, 徐光黎. 盾构掘进、离开施工阶段对地表变形的 影响范围及量化预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[14] 周家作, 韦昌富, 魏厚振, 杨周洁, 李力昕, 李彦龙, 丁根荣, . 多功能水合物沉积物三轴试验系统的研制与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 342-352.
[15] 尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘 超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] 温世亿,李静,苏霞,姚雄. 复杂应力条件下围岩破坏的细观特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] 毛 宁,张尧亮. 经验公式简便求法典型实例[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978 -2982 .
[5] 刘 杰,李建林,屈建军,陈 星,李剑武,骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[6] 李伟华,赵成刚,杜楠馨. 软弱饱和土夹层对地铁车站地震响应的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3958 -3963 .
[7] 韩现民. 西格二线关角隧道浅埋砂层段施工技术及力学效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 297 -302 .
[8] 蒋臻蔚,彭建兵,王启耀. 西安市地铁3号线不良地质问题及对策研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 317 -321 .
[9] 刘用海,朱向荣,常林越. 基于Casagrande法数学分析确定先期固结压力[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 211 -214 .
[10] 祝 磊,洪宝宁. 粉状煤系土的物理力学特性[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1317 -1322 .