56 m深TRD工法搅拌墙在深厚承压含水层中的成墙试验研究

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 3247-3252.

56 m深TRD工法搅拌墙在深厚承压含水层中的成墙试验研究

王卫东^{1, 2}，翁其平^{1, 2}，陈永才^{1, 2}

1.华东建筑设计研究总院地基基础与地下工程设计研究中心，上海 200002； 2.上海基坑工程环境安全控制工程技术研究中心，上海 200002

收稿日期:2014-06-03 出版日期:2014-11-11 发布日期:2014-12-10
作者简介:王卫东，男，1969年生，博士，教授级高级工程师，主要从事地基基础与地下工程的设计研究。
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划（No. 2012BAJ01B02）；上海市建交委科研项目（建管2013-009-009）；上海市科委工程技术研发中心平台建设项目（No. 13DZ2251400）。

Experimental investigation of construction of a 56 m deep constant thickness cement-soil wall using trench cutting re-mixing deep wall (TRD) method in deep aquifers

WANG Wei-dong^{1, 2}, WENG Qi-ping^{1, 2}, CHEN Yong-cai^{1, 2}

1. Department of Underground Structure & Geotechnical Engineering, East China Architecture Design & Research Institute, Shanghai 200002, China; 2. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Safety Control for Facilities Adjacent to Deep Excavations, Shanghai 200002, China

Received:2014-06-03 Online:2014-11-11 Published:2014-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 上海国际金融中心项目基坑面积约为48 860 m2，开挖深度为26.5～27.9 m，周边环境复杂。为控制抽降承压水对周边环境的影响，经方案比选，基坑周边设置厚700 mm、深56 m等厚度水泥土搅拌墙（TRD）作为承压水悬挂隔水帷幕。在上海地区施工如此深TRD墙体尚属首例，为此现场开展了试成墙试验，试成墙监测表明，墙身在深厚承压含水层中水泥土强度达到0.84～1.38 MPa。室内渗透性试验表明，渗透系数由10-3 cm/s提高到10-7 cm/s，满足隔水帷幕设计要求；墙体施工期间，地表最大沉降约8 mm，主要影响范围约5 m；土体侧向位移主要产生在距离墙体5 m的范围内，TRD墙体施工对周边环境影响很小。试验墙体的顺利实施为后续正式墙体的施工提供了依据，也为类似工程提供了重要参考。

关键词: 基坑, 等厚度水泥土搅拌墙, TRD工法, 隔水帷幕, 承压水

Abstract: The excavation area of Shanghai International Financial Center, whose surrounding environment is complex, is 48 860 m2. The depth of the excavation ranges from 26.5 to 27.9 m. In order to minimize pumping effects of confined water on the surrounding environment, a 700 mm thick and 56 m deep constant thickness cement-soil wall has constructed as a watertight screen along the periphery of the excavation. As the first time to construct such a deep TRD wall in Shanghai, a series of tests had carried out on the site. The monitoring results show that the strength of the cement-soil wall has ranged from 0.84 MPa to 1.38 MPa in the deep aquifer. Laboratory permeability test results show that the permeability of the wall is increased from 10-3 cm/s to 10-7 cm/s. Both strength and permeability of the wall satisfied the design requirements for a watertight screen. During construction of the wall, the maximum surface settlement is about 8 mm and the main influence zone is approximately 5m away from the wall. It is also observed that lateral soil displacements mainly took place within 5 m from the wall. Therefore, the influence of the wall construction on the surrounding environment is negligible. The test results provide references for subsequent construction of the TRD walls and serve as a case study for similar projects in Shanghai as well.

Key words: excavation, constant thickness cement-soil wall, TRD construction method, watertight screen；aquifer

中图分类号:

TU 471

王卫东，翁其平，陈永才 , . 56 m深TRD工法搅拌墙在深厚承压含水层中的成墙试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3247-3252.

WANG Wei-dong , WENG Qi-ping , CHEN Yong-cai , . Experimental investigation of construction of a 56 m deep constant thickness cement-soil wall using trench cutting re-mixing deep wall (TRD) method in deep aquifers [J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3247-3252.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	丁智, 张霄, 金杰克, 王立忠, . 基坑全过程开挖及邻近地铁隧道变形实测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 415-423.
[5]	申翃, 李晓, 雷美清, 徐文博, 余秀玲, . 剪力键支护体系的构想及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2574-2580.
[6]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[7]	谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[8]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[9]	钟国强, 王浩, 孔利, 王成汤, . 基于T-S模糊故障树的地连墙+支撑支护基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1569-1576.
[10]	李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[11]	张骁, 肖军华, 农兴中, 郭佳奇, 吴楠, . 基于HS-Small模型的基坑近接桥桩开挖变形影响区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 263-273.
[12]	郑刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.
[13]	王克忠, 金志豪, 杨麦珍, 刘先亮, 刘华, . 取水塔基坑开挖过程倒悬岩坎围堰渗透稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 415-422.
[14]	刘成禹，郑智享，. 改进的基于p-y曲线的基坑围护结构计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 446-452.
[15]	马凯，尹立明，陈军涛，陈明，王自起，崔博强,. 深部开采底板隔水关键层受局部高承压水作用破坏理论分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3213-3222.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed