›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 3352-3360.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

湿胀条件下合肥膨胀土土-水特征研究

谭晓慧,辛志宇,沈梦芬,汪贤恩,徐 全   

  1. 合肥工业大学 资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230009
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-18 出版日期:2014-12-11 发布日期:2014-12-15
  • 作者简介:谭晓慧,女,1971年生,博士,教授,主要从事非饱和土的研究及岩土工程的可靠度分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 40972194,No. 41272251)。

Study of soil-water characteristics of Hefei expansive soil under moisture-expansion condition

TAN Xiao-hui, XIN Zhi-yu, SHEN Meng-fen, WANG Xian-en, XU Quan   

  1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
  • Received:2013-09-18 Online:2014-12-11 Published:2014-12-15

摘要: 膨胀土在吸水时会产生体积膨胀,研究湿胀条件下膨胀土的土-水特征具有重要意义。以合肥地区9种弱膨胀土为研究对象,采用滤纸法和渗析法试验测定了膨胀土的土-水特征,采用蒸汽加湿法试验测定了膨胀土在吸湿过程中的体积变化。基于土-水特征曲线(SWCC)试验及加湿试验,获得了膨胀土在吸湿过程中的体积变化规律,得到了湿胀条件下膨胀土的重力含水率?基质吸力曲线(w-ψ曲线)及体积含水率?基质吸力曲线(θw3-ψ曲线),分析了膨胀土吸湿过程中的体积变化对体积含水率?基质吸力曲线的影响,探讨了w-ψ与θw3-ψ曲线拟合参数的变异性及参数间的相关性。结果表明:蒸汽法加湿土样是一种较为理想的增湿方式;湿胀条件下,w-ψ曲线与考虑体变的θw3-ψ曲线的差异程度与吸湿结束后的土样含水率有关;w-ψ曲线的变异性小于θw3-ψ曲线的变异性;拟合参数n的变异性小于参数a及m的变异性;w-ψ曲线及θw3-ψ曲线的对应拟合参数间呈线性关系。

关键词: 膨胀土, 土-水特征, 基质吸力, 曲线拟合, 变异性

Abstract: Expansive soil will appear volume expansion under moisture adsorption condition. It is very important to study the soil-water characteristics of expansive soil under moisture adsorption and expansive conditions. Considering nine Hebei expansive soils as the study objects, soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) tests by osmotic method and filter paper method are carried out. Filter paper method is used to measure the lower suction range, while osmotic method is used to measure the higher suction range. Moisture adsorption tests are carried out by steam humidification method. Based on soil-water characteristics tests and moisture adsorption tests, the volume change rules of expansive soils under wetting condition can be obtained. The experiment data are then curve fitting by using Matlab, and the gravity water content-suction curves (w-ψ curves) and the volumetric water content-suction curves (θw3-ψ curves) are obtained. The influence of the volume change of expansive soil under moisture adsorption condition on the θw3-ψ curves is analyzed; and the variability and correlation between curve fitting parameters of w-ψ curves and θw3-ψ curves are also studied. The results show that the steam humidification method is a good approach for moisture adsorption test. During the steam humidification process, the moisture is adsorbed slowly and uniformly, and the shape of soil sample remains unchanged. The void ratio?gravity water content curve can be divided into four stages, which are initial stage, approximate linear stage, nearly horizontal stage, and ascent stage along the saturation line. The difference between the two types of SWCCs (w-ψ curves and θw3-ψ curves) is due to the volume change of expansive soil samples during the wetting process, and the extent of volume change depends heavily on the water content of expansive soil samples after the moisture adsorption process. The variability of w-ψ curves is less than that of θw3-ψ curves. For both of the two types of SWCCs, the variability of parameter n is relatively small, which means that the slopes of SWCCs are close to each other for different soils. The variabilites of parameters a and m are larger than that of parameter n. The corresponding curve fitting parameters of w-ψ curves and θw3-ψ curves are linearly correlated. Therefore, the curve fitting parameters of θw3-ψ curves can be preliminary estimated by those of w-ψ curves.

Key words: expansive soil, soil-water characteristics, matric suction, curve fitting, variability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[2] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[3] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[4] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[5] 田密, 盛小涛, . 岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[6] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[7] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[8] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[9] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[10] 洪本根, 罗嗣海, 胡世丽, 王观石, 姚康, . 基质吸力对非饱和离子型稀土抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2303-2310.
[11] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[12] 于 正, 杨龙才, 张 勇, 赵 伟, . 考虑地层变异特征一致性的围岩变形不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1947-1956.
[13] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[14] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[15] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈红江,李夕兵,刘爱华. 矿井突水水源判别的多组逐步Bayes判别方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3655 -3659 .
[2] 和法国,谌文武,韩文峰,张景科. 高分子材料SH固沙性能与微结构相关性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3803 -3807 .
[3] 雷永生. 西安地铁二号线下穿城墙及钟楼保护措施研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 223 -228 .
[4] 肖 忠,王元战,及春宁,黄泰坤,单 旭. 波浪作用下加固软基上大圆筒结构稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2648 -2654 .
[5] 柴 波,殷坤龙,陈丽霞,李远耀. 岩体结构控制下的斜坡变形特征[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 521 -525 .
[6] 赵洪波,茹忠亮,张士科. SVM在地下工程可靠性分析中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 526 -530 .
[7] 徐 扬,高 谦,李 欣,李俊华,贾云喜. 土石混合体渗透性现场试坑试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 855 -858 .
[8] 邓华锋,张国栋,王乐华,邓成进,郭 靖,鲁 涛. 导流隧洞开挖施工的爆破振动监测与分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 855 -860 .
[9] 谭峰屹,邹志悝,邹荣华,林祖锴,郑德高. 换填黏性土料工程特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 154 -157 .
[10] 胡再强,李宏儒,苏永江. 岗曲河混凝土面板堆石坝三维静力应力变形分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 312 -0317 .