›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 523-531.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.02.031

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大直径杯型冻土壁温度场数值分析

胡 俊1, 2,杨 平1   

  • 收稿日期:2013-10-13 出版日期:2015-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 杨平,男,1964年生,教授,博导,主要从事环境岩土与地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:yangping@njfu.edu.cn E-mail:hj7140477@hainu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:胡俊,男,1983年生,博士,讲师,主要从事环境岩土与地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。

Numerical analysis of temperature field within large-diameter cup-shaped frozen soil wall

HU Jun1, 2, YANG Ping1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228, China)
  • Received:2013-10-13 Online:2015-02-11 Published:2018-06-13

关键词: 大直径杯型冻土壁, 盾构始发, 温度场, 数值模拟

Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive study of the generation and distribution patterns of the temperature field within a large-diameter cup-shaped frozen soil wall used in shield construction of Nanjing Subway Line 10. Three dimensional finite element analyses are taken to elucidate various influential factors for the temperature field. It is found that, if the thicknesses of cup-shaped frozen soil walls can satisfy the designed amounts needed for the purpose of ground reinforcement, frozen wall forms in a clear sequence: firstly, in the outer tubes, then the intermediate tubes, and lastly, the inner tubes. The “closure time” of the frozen wall, which means the time period required for the full formation of the frozen soil wall, is heavily dependent on soil’s thermal conductivity as well as the original ground temperature. The closure time would decrease linearly with the increase of the thermal conductivity; it would increase linearly with the increase of original ground temperature of soil and volumetric heat capacity. For the concerned Nanjing shield tunneling site, it took around 12 days. This would have increased by approximate every one more day if the original ground temperature increases by every 5℃. The latent heat is found to be of no apparent influence in the cooling process of soil. Notwithstanding, the cooling speed varies much with different types of soil. Generally, the cooling speed of sandy cemented soil and sand is faster than that of clay cemented soil and clay respectively. However, they reach the phase-transitional-stage almost simultaneously. It is also noted that the frozen walls in sand are always formed 4 days earlier than those in clay regardless of whether the cement is in place or not. Results and conclusions from this research may play a useful role to aid designs of similar projects in the future.

Key words: large-diameter cup-shaped frozen soil wall, shield launching, temperature field, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • null
[1] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[5] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[6] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[7] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[8] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[9] 刘伟俊, 张晋勋, 单仁亮, 杨昊, 梁辰, . 渗流作用下北京砂卵石地层多排管局部 水平冻结体温度场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3425-3434.
[10] 吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑 流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[11] 孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[12] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[13] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[14] 张 聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹 磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[15] 严 健, 何 川, 汪 波, 蒙 伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[2] 刘恩龙. 岩土破损力学:结构块破损机制与二元介质模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[3] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[4] 张 波,李术才,杨学英,王锡平. 三维黏弹性人工边界地震波动输入方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 774 -778 .
[5] 陈 林,张永兴,冉可新. 考虑剪应力作用的挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 219 -223 .
[6] 石 崇 ,徐卫亚 ,张 玉 ,李德亮 ,刘 和. 基于元胞自动机模型的堆积体动力学参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1795 -1800 .
[7] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .
[8] 宋义敏 ,姜耀东 ,马少鹏 ,杨小彬 ,赵同彬 . 岩石变形破坏全过程的变形场和能量演化研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1352 -1356 .
[9] 夏艳华 ,白世伟 . 基于水平集的复杂三维地层模型建模及在地下工程中的应用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1445 -1450 .
[10] 张春阳,曹 平,范 祥,林 杭,万琳辉. 高黏性铝土矿放矿流动性试验与微观力学研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1653 -1659 .