›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 981-987.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.04.010

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于损伤控制方法的大理岩非线性剪胀特性试验研究

汪 斌,朱杰兵,邬爱清,张利洁,黄书岭   

  1. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-22 出版日期:2015-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:汪斌,男,1977年生,博士,主要从事等岩体力学特性及边坡工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51209020,No. 41272350,No. 51379022);973计划项目(No. 2011CB710603)。

Experimental study of nonlinear dilatancy characteristics based on the damage-controlled method

WANG Bin,ZHU Jie-bing,WU Ai-qing,ZHANG Li-jie,HUANG Shu-ling   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics & Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2014-07-22 Online:2015-04-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 剪胀角是描述岩石体积膨胀扩容的常用参数,在非关联流动法则中,连续介质理论通常假设剪胀角为0;在关联流动法则中,其值恒定且等于内摩擦角。岩石三轴压缩全过程体应变曲线表明,其体积剪胀性依赖于围压和塑性参量,破坏过程中不仅其特征强度随围压和塑性参量呈非线性变化,而且剪胀特性也表现出非线性特征。基于塑性力学理论,针对锦屏大理岩损伤控制的全过程三轴加、卸载试验,采用双参数非线性函数拟合方法建立了能同时考虑围压效应和塑性参量的非线性剪胀角模型。结果表明,对于大理岩、中硬岩,在破坏过程中扩容行为强烈依赖围压和岩石塑性参量,均表现出先快速增加至峰值后,随着塑性变形增加逐渐减小的非线性演化规律。提出的双参数非线性剪胀角模型很好地描述了岩石破坏过程中的体积扩容特性,其结果对于研究地下工程围岩应力变化诱发的围岩剪胀破坏机制、体积扩容膨胀区范围预测和围岩支护的合理设计均具有一定的理论和工程应用价值。

关键词: 剪胀角, 损伤控制, 塑性参量, 三轴加卸载试验, 非线性剪胀角模型

Abstract: Dilatancy angle is commonly used to describe the expansion behaviours of rock. Continuum theory generally assumes that the value of dilatancy angle is 0° for the materials obeying the non-associated flow rule, but for those materials obeying the associated flow rule the dilatancy angle is a constant value equal to internal friction angle. The full volumetric curves of triaxial compression show that volumetric dilatancy is highly dependent on the confining pressure and plastic parameters. In a full failure process, not only the characteristic strength but also characteristics of dilatancy properties behave in a nonlinear manner with change of confining pressure and plastic parameters,. Employing plasticity theory and the nonlinear fitting method, a double parameters’ dilatancy angle model is developed, based on damage control triaxial loading and unloading cycle test data of Jinping marble, to take into account the effects of the confining pressure and plastic parameters. The model reveals that the dilatancy behaviors of marble as well as similar hard rocks are mainly governed by the confining pressure and plastic parameters during a failure process, which shows significant nonlinearity, and the dilatancy angle rapidly increases to the peak and then decreases gradually with increasing plastic deformation. The proposed double-parameters nonlinear dilatancy angle model can be used to describe the volumetric dilatancy properties, helping understand the mechanism of surrounding rock failure around underground openings and predict the range of expansion volume. In addition, the proposed model has theoretical and practical bearings on the design of supporting structures in underground rock engineering.

Key words: shear dilatancy angle, damage-control, plastic parameter, triaxial loading and unloading cycle test, nonlinear dilatancy angle model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 硬岩弹塑性变形破坏过程中强度参数 及剪胀角演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4401-4411.
[3] 陈 锋, 张青庆, 姚 威, 叶良良, . 含泥盐岩的扩容特性与剪胀角模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 195-201.
[4] 唐宇峰,施富强,廖学燕,周 帅, . 基于光滑粒子流体动力学的流动法则对土体滑坡大变形的影响探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1509-1516.
[5] 刘新荣,刘 俊,李栋梁,何春梅,王子娟,谢应坤,. 不同初始卸荷水平对深埋砂岩力学特性影响规律试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3081-3088.
[6] 蔡 俊,叶海旺,雷 涛,贺怀建,. 考虑剪胀角的节理化岩体隧道开挖进尺优化研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 639-644.
[7] 刘 博,李海波,刘亚群. 循环剪切荷载作用下岩石节理变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2475-2481.
[8] 王者超,李术才,吕晓庆,薛翊国. 地下水封石油洞库施工期围岩完整性参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 488-495.
[9] 刘清秉,项 伟,M. Budhu ,崔德山. 砂土颗粒形状量化及其对力学指标的影响分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 190-197.
[10] 孔位学,芮勇勤,董宝弟. 岩土材料在非关联流动法则下剪胀角选取探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3278-3282.
[11] 张培文 ,陈祖煜 . 剪胀角对地基承载力的影响[J]. , 2006, 27(3): 463-465.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] 胡大伟,周 辉,谢守益,张 凯,邵建富,冯夏庭. 大理岩破坏阶段Biot系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3727 -3732 .
[3] 朱建明,彭新坡,姚仰平,徐金海. SMP准则在计算煤柱极限强度中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2987 -2990 .
[4] 原喜忠,李 宁,赵秀云,杨银涛. 东北多年冻土地区地基承载力对气候变化敏感性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[5] 唐利民. 地基沉降预测模型的正则化算法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[6] 李占海,朱万成,冯夏庭,李绍军,周 辉,陈炳瑞. 侧压力系数对马蹄形隧道损伤破坏的影响研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 434 -441 .
[7] 蔡辉腾,危福泉,蔡宗文. 重庆主城区粉质黏土动力特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[8] 宋 玲 ,刘奉银 ,李 宁 . 旋压入土式静力触探机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .
[9] 金解放 ,李夕兵 ,殷志强 ,邹 洋. 循环冲击下波阻抗定义岩石损伤变量的研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1385 -1393 .
[10] 周延军 ,耿应春 ,王贵宾 ,唐洪林 ,李祖奎. 深部地层岩石力学性质测试与分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1625 -1630 .