›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 1102-1118.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.04.027

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

1989~2011期间8次强地震中抗液化地基处理成功案例的回顾与启示

陈国兴1, 2,顾小锋1, 2,常向东3,李小军2, 4,周国良3   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2. 南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009; 3. 环境保护部核与辐射安全中心,北京 100082;4. 中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-02 出版日期:2015-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学和岩土地震工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41172258);国家科技重大专项(No. 2011ZX06002-010-15,No. 2013ZX06002001-09)。

Review and implication of successful ground improvement cases about mitigating soil liquefaction induced by 8 strong earthquakes from 1989 to 2011

CHEN Guo-xing1, 2,GU Xiao-feng1, 2,CHANG Xiang-dong3,LI Xiao-jun2, 4,ZHOU Guo-liang3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjina Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 3. Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection of P.R. China, Beijing 100082, China; 4. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2014-06-02 Online:2015-04-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 回顾了1989年美国Mw6.9级Loma Prieta地震、1993年日本Ms7.8级Kushiro-Oki地震、1994年日本Mw8.2级Hokkaido Toho-Oki地震、1995年日本Ms7.2级阪神地震、1999年台湾集集地震、1999年土耳其Mw7.4级Kocaeli地震、2001年美国Mw6.8级Nisqually地震以及2011年Mw9.0级东日本地震中场地抗液化工程措施的成功案例,初步分析了各种抗液化工程措施的有效性与优劣性,可以给出如下工程场地抗液化处理的经验:(1)对于易液化的沿海及填海造陆场地,采用适宜的抗液化工程措施应成为地基处理不可缺少的环节;(2)应基于场地条件、经济条件及环境要求,综合考虑场地抗液化地基处理措施的选择;(3)挤密砂桩法和碎石桩法运用广泛、技术成熟且比较经济,宜优先选择作为抗震设防烈度Ⅷ度及以下地区的场地抗液化地基处理措施;(4)强夯法使用机具简单、费用低廉,适宜选择作为抗震设防烈度Ⅷ度及以下地区大面积场地的抗液化地基处理措施;(5)注浆法、深层搅拌法、旋喷法作为抗震设防烈度Ⅸ度及以下地区的场地抗液化地基处理措施是有效的;(6)多种抗液化地基处理措施联合使用的处理效果往往优于单一措施单独使用的处理效果,在条件许可的情况下,宜选择多种抗液化地基处理措施联合使用,以期达到更好的处理效果。

关键词: 强地震, 场地液化, 抗液化地基处理措施, 地基处理案例

Abstract: The successful cases about soil liquefaction mitigation are reviewed, in the sites of the 1989 Loma Prieta, USA earthquake, the 1993 Kushiro-Oki, Japan earthquake, the 1994 Hokkaido Toho-Oki, Japan earthquake, the 1995 Hanshin, Japan earthquake, the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake, the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake ,the 2001 Nisqually, USA earthquake and the 2011 great east Japan earthquake, and the applicability and performance of various mitigation measures are analyzed. The lessons we have learned from these successful cases of soil treatment include: (1) for bay areas or reclaimed lands, the ground treatments against soil liquefaction are indispensable; (2) the choice of soil liquefaction countermeasures should be based on the consideration of site conditions, economic conditions and the environmental conditions; (3) compacted sand piles and stone columns are widely used, which have become mature and economical technics, and they are suitable for improving liquefaction-prone soils in the seismic intensity VIII zone and below; (4) the dynamic compaction method is simple and less expansive, and this method is especially suitable for large fields in the seismic intensity VIII zone and below; (5) grouting, deep soil mixing and jet grouting methods are effective in mitigating the earthquake-induced liquefaction damages in the seismic intensity IX zone and below; 6) the combination of various liquefaction countermeasures is more effective than an individual measure. If possible, multiple methods should be used in combination to achieve better effects.

Key words: strong earthquake, site liquefaction, improved site methods to mitigate soil liquefaction, successful ground improvement cases

中图分类号: 

  • TU 476
[1] 陈 磊,陈国兴,龙 慧. 地铁交叉隧道近场强地震反应特性的三维精细化非线性有限元分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3971-3976.
[2] 张玉敏,盛 谦,朱泽奇,张占荣. 深度衰减效应对大型地下洞室群强震响应的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3197-3202.
[3] 梁庆国 ,韩文峰 ,马润勇 ,谌文武,. 强地震动作用下层状岩体破坏的物理模拟研究[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1307-1311.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[4] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[5] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[6] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[7] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[8] 王云岗 ,章 光 ,胡 琦. 斜桩基础受力特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2184 -2190 .
[9] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .