›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 1239-1252.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.05.002

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

以剪切波速与地表峰值加速度为依据的地震液化确定性及概率判别法

孔梦云1, 2,陈国兴1, 2,李小军2, 3,常向东4,周国良4   

  1. 1.南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2.南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009; 3.中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京 100081;4.环境保护部核与辐射安全中心,北京 100082
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-28 出版日期:2015-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: gxchen@njut.edu.cn E-mail:mengyunkong@gmail.com
  • 作者简介:孔梦云,女,1989年生,硕士,主要从事地震液化判别方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41172258);国家重点基础研究发展计划(No. 2011CB013601);国家科技重大专项(No. 2011ZX06002-010-15; No. 2013ZX06002001-09)。

Shear wave velocity and peak ground acceleration based deterministic and probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential

KONG Meng-yun1, 2, CHEN Guo-xing1, 2, LI Xiao-jun2, 3, CHANG Xiang-dong4, ZHOU Guo-liang4   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Technology University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Technology University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 3. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China; 4. Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Beijing 100082, China
  • Received:2013-12-28 Online:2015-05-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 剪切波速作为土性的基本参数,为评价土体抵抗地震液化的能力提供了一种方法。回顾了以剪切波速和地表峰值加速度为依据的场地地震液化判别方法的演化历史,依据他人收集的现场液化资料,合计49次地震、618例液化/不液化场地数据,提出了确定液化临界曲线的基本原则,给出了基于修正剪切波速与地表峰值加速度的液化临界曲线,验证了液化临界曲线的位置对细粒含量、有效上覆压力、震级等因素取值变化的合理性,分析了估计土层循环应力比CSR的剪应力折减系数、震级标定系数、有效上覆压力修正系数等因素的不确定性对液化临界曲线的敏感性。结果表明:液化临界曲线对各种影响因素具有很好的适用性。利用Monte Carlo模拟、加权最大似然法和加权经验概率法,给出了建议的液化临界曲线的名义抗液化安全系数与液化概率的经验关系式及概率等值线,并对核电厂Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类抗震物项地基,分别建议了相应的液化临界曲线。该方法以丰富的现场液化数据为依据,具有广泛的应用前景。

关键词: 非基岩核电厂场址, 土体液化判别, 确定性方法, 概率方法, 液化临界曲线, 剪切波速, 地表峰值加速度

Abstract: As a fundamental parameter of soil, the shear wave velocity (denoted VS)offers a means to determine the seismic resistance of soil to liquefaction. The historical developments of VS and peak ground acceleration (denoted PGA)——based assessment method of soil liquefaction potential is reviewed. The basic principle to determine liquefaction triggering curve is given. The corresponding liquefaction triggering curve is proposed based on the database used by Kayen, Andrus, Saygili and Chu for a total of 49 earthquakes, 618 case histories. The position of liquefaction triggering curve is verified with respect to various factors based on the case history database, such as fines content, overburden stress and magnitude scales. In addition, the sensitivity of the database’s interpretation to a number of aspects and components of the analysis framework is examined, such as the shear stress reduction factor that accounts for the dynamic response of the soil profile, the magnitude scaling factor, the overburden correction factor for cyclic stress ratio. And the results show these factors have slight effects on the position of the proposed liquefaction triggering curve. At last, the relationship between nominal safety factor and probability of liquefaction as well as the probabilistic contours for the proposed liquefaction triggering curve are given based on Monte Carlo simulation, the weighted maximum likelihood method and weighted empirical probability data. The soil liquefaction triggering curves are proposed for the seismic design category Ⅰ、Ⅱ and Ⅲ of the structure, system and component of nuclear power plants, respectively. The presented assessment is provided with wide application prospects.

Key words: the soil site of nuclear power plants, soil liquefaction assessment, deterministic assessment, probability assessment, liquefaction triggering curve, shear wave velocity, peak ground acceleration

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, 孙锐. 液化判别临界曲线的变化模式与一般规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3603-3609.
[2] 陈卓识, 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 王克. 土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
[3] 杨洋, 孙锐, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2755-2764.
[4] 朱雨萌, 吴 琪, 陈国兴, . 基于颗粒接触状态理论的砂-粉混合料 剪切波速试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1457-1464.
[5] 陈国兴 ,金丹丹 ,朱 姣 ,李小军 , . 河口盆地非线性地震效应及设计地震动参数[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1721-1736.
[6] 何先龙 ,赵立珍 ,佘天莉,. 基于能量变化率法自动拾取场地剪切波速[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 847-853.
[7] 陈国兴 ,孔梦云 ,李小军 ,常向东 ,周国良,. 以标贯试验为依据的砂土液化确定性及概率判别法[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 9-27.
[8] 王 超,张社荣,于 茂. 峡谷区重力坝岸坡坝段动力稳定性评估方法[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1383-1390.
[9] 丁伯阳,张 勇. 杭州第四系软土动力特性试验与土结构性影响的探讨[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 336-342.
[10] 何先龙,赵立珍. 基于多重互相关函数分析剪切波速[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2541-2545.
[11] 刘章军,陈 飞,周宜红. 岩质路堑深边坡稳定性评价的模糊概率方法[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 368-372.
[12] 蔡国军,刘松玉,童立元,杜广印. 基于SCPTU的软土最大剪切模量测试分析研究[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2556-2560.
[13] 董连成 ,陶夏新 ,师黎静 ,李广影 . 利用地脉动台阵记录反演场地浅层Vs结构[J]. , 2008, 29(2): 553-556.
[14] 黄 诚,杨春和,王安明. 利用全概率方法分析岩土力学数值模拟结果的变异性[J]. , 2008, 29(11): 2919-2926.
[15] 程国勇 ,王建华 ,张献民 . 饱和砂土的剪切波速与其抗液化强度关系研究[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 689-693.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[2] 何思明,吴 永,李新坡. 嵌岩抗拔桩作用机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 333 -337 .
[3] 况雨春,伍开松,杨迎新,马德坤. 三牙轮钻头破岩过程计算机仿真模型[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 235 -238 .
[4] 杜文琪,王 刚. 土工结构地震滑动位移统计分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 520 -0525 .
[5] 鄢治华,刘志伟,刘厚健. 黄河阶地上某电厂高边坡参数选取及其工程治理[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 465 -468 .
[6] 许振浩 ,李术才 ,李利平 ,侯建刚 ,隋 斌 ,石少帅. 基于层次分析法的岩溶隧道突水突泥风险评估[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1757 -1766 .
[7] 温世清 ,刘汉龙 ,陈育民. 浆固碎石桩单桩荷载传递特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3637 -3641 .
[8] 李顺群 ,高凌霞 ,柴寿喜. 冻土力学性质影响因素的显著性和交互作用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1173 -1177 .
[9] 钟 声 ,王川婴 ,吴立新 ,唐新建 ,王清远. 点状不良地质体钻孔雷达响应特征 ——围岩及充填效应正演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1191 -1195 .
[10] 孟 振,陈锦剑,王建华,尹振宇. 砂土中螺纹桩承载特性的模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 141 -145 .