›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (S1): 1021-1026.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

竖向地震动对斜坡场地非线性地震反应的影响

陈学良1,金 星2,陶夏新3   

  1. 1. 中国地震局 工程力学研究所, 哈尔滨 150080;2. 福建省地震局,福州 350003;3. 哈尔滨工业大学,哈尔滨 150008
  • 收稿日期:2006-07-20 发布日期:2006-12-15
  • 作者简介:陈学良,男,1976年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程动力反应、非线性场地对地震动的影响、地震安评等研究。
  • 基金资助:
    地震科学联合基金青年课题(No. 604036);国家社会公益研究专项-活断层上强烈地震引起地震动和地表破裂(No. 2002DIB30076)。

Effects of vertical strong ground motion on nonlinear seismic response of slope site

CHEN Xue-liang1,JIN Xing2,TAO Xia-xin3   

  1. 1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China; 2. Earthquake Administration of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350003, China; 3. Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150008, China
  • Received:2006-07-20 Published:2006-12-15

摘要: 国内外规范中推荐或强制规定竖向地震动取为剪切反应谱的1/2~2/3,但该规定如何改进使其更合理已成为一重要课题。首先,对其研究现状简单总结,给出了可处理辐射阻尼、地震动相位特性、计算高效的二维波动显式有限元等效线性化程序ELPSV编制的必要性,然后进行了分析。初步研究表明,竖向地震动强度对周期在0.3 s以下的地表剪切反应谱有一定的影响,而高于0.3 s部分影响轻微。竖向地震动强度对斜坡场地的竖向地震反应及地表竖向反应谱影响显著,按规范的取值将偏于不安全。受地形条件影响,坡顶剪切地震反应会比坡脚反应要大,而竖向地震反应并不明显。土层边界面的地震反应要比周围反应要低,交界面效应明显。软斜坡场地地震反应特性除场地竖向地震反应自下而上先增加后减小的规律外,其他情形与硬斜坡场地的规律基本一致。该结果定量反映了竖向地震动的影响程度,为斜坡场地上考虑竖向地震动的建(构)筑结构的抗震设计提供了有益的基础。

关键词: 竖向地震动, 斜坡场地, 非线性地震反应, 影响分析

Abstract: The methods of taking half or 2/3 of shear response spectrum as vertical seismic action, recommended or prescribed compulsorily in many engineering codes at home and abroad, are used to design buildings. But how to rationally consider this effect is one of the most important tasks. Firstly, these research advancements are reviewed. The necessary of equivalent linear method of 2D wave motion explicit FEM ELPSV program with characteristic of high efficiency, real phase, actual radiation damping, is discussed. Then, strength of vertical strong ground motion influencing on response spectrum of slope site surface, equivalent response history and PGD and PGV in site section, seismic response of soft slope site are analyzed; and draw some primary conclusions as follows: There are certain influences on shear seismic response spectrum when the period less than 0.3 s, but it is very light over 0.3 s. Vertical seismic response of slope site was distinctly changed by vertical strong ground motion. Moreover, value of vertical seismic action in code for seismic design for buildings is apt to unsafety. Simultaneously, vertical response of the right site is great than the left’s. The slope top’s shear response is much stronger than slope feet’s for slope topography condition, while vertical seismic response is not obvious. Magnified effect in strong ground motion is more than in weak motion when ratio of horizontal to vertical component(av/ah) is 2/3, which agrees with the knowledge of nonlinear response. Interestingly, Interface effects make the response is lower than ambient site response. And soft site response is essentially consistent with phenomena of the hard site, except for vertical seismic response is increased previously and then decreased from site bottom to the top. At last, concise epilogue is given. All of conclusions and study results reflected quantitatively effect extent of vertical strong ground motion, provide beneficial basement for rational considering vertical strong ground motion in aseismic design of buildings and constructions in slope site.

Key words: vertical strong ground motion, slope site, nonlinear seismic response, effect and analysis

中图分类号: 

  • U 416.1
[1] 李晓明,赵庆斌,杨祈敏,赵其华,丁梓涵,. 碎石土及碎石土-基岩地基斜坡场地m值研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1327-1336.
[2] 黄小福,张迎宾,赵兴权,余鹏程,邢 昊,张 珏,陈岩岩,. 地震条件下危岩崩塌运动特性的初步探讨[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 583-592.
[3] 陈 磊,陈国兴,龙 慧. 地铁交叉隧道近场强地震反应特性的三维精细化非线性有限元分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3971-3976.
[4] 黄 诚,王安明,任伟中. 水平向与竖向地震动的时间遇合模式对边坡动力安全系数的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3404-3410.
[5] 卢 滔 ,周正华 ,霍敬妍 . 土层非线性地震反应一维时域分析[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2170-2176.
[6] 庄海洋,陈国兴,梁艳仙,徐 明. 土体动非线性黏弹性模型及其ABAQUS软件的实现[J]. , 2007, 28(3): 436-442.
[7] 于 宁,朱合华. 盾构施工仿真及其相邻影响的数值分析[J]. , 2004, 25(2): 292-296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 唐明明,王芝银,马兰平,曾志华,张之沛. 油气管道穿越黄土冲沟的管线设计参数研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1314 -1318 .
[2] 梅国雄,卢廷浩,陈 浩,李 治. 考虑初始应力的坑侧土体真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2079 -2082 .
[3] 徐 明,陈金锋,宋二祥. 陡坡寺中微风化料的大型三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2496 -2500 .
[4] 林 杭,曹 平,李江腾,江学良,何忠明. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的三维边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3656 -3660 .
[5] 魏 宁,李小春,王 燕,谷志孟. 城市垃圾填埋场甲烷资源量与利用前景[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1687 -1692 .
[6] 牛文杰,叶为民,刘绍刚,禹海涛. 考虑饱和-非饱和渗流的土坡极限分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2477 -2482 .
[7] 王可良,刘 玲,隋同波,徐运海, 胡廷正. 坝体岩基-橡胶粉改性混凝土现场抗剪(断)试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 753 -756 .
[8] 林达明,尚彦军,孙福军,孙元春,吴锋波,刘志强. 岩体强度估算方法研究及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 837 -842 .
[9] 邓东平,李 亮,赵炼恒. 基于Janbu法的边坡整体稳定性滑动面搜索新方法[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 891 -898 .
[10] 吴 剑,冯少孔,李宏阶. 钻孔成像中结构面自动判读技术研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 951 -957 .