›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 1981-1988.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.07.020

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切试验研究

李永辉1,王卫东2,黄茂松3,郭院成1   

  1. 1. 郑州大学 土木工程学院,河南 郑州 450001;2. 华东建筑设计研究总院,上海 200002;3. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-22 出版日期:2015-07-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:李永辉,男,1983年生,博士,主要从事高层建筑桩基的研究与分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    十二五国家科技支撑计划(No. 2012BAJ01B00)

Experimental research on pile-soil interface shear behaviors of super-long bored pile

LI Yong-hui1,WANG Wei-dong2,HUANG Mao-song3,GUO Yuan-cheng1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China; 2. East China Architectural Design & Research Institute, Shanghai 200002, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2014-01-22 Online:2015-07-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 为研究超长灌注桩桩侧与土体接触界面的剪切力学行为,采用大型界面剪切仪,开展混凝土与粉质黏土、粉细砂土接触界面剪切试验。针对钻孔灌注桩泥浆护壁施工特点及后注浆工艺的应用,在混凝土与粉细砂土界面设置膨润土泥皮或膨润土泥皮与水泥浆,以研究泥皮及存在泥皮时注浆对界面剪切性状的影响。试验结果表明:界面剪切应力随剪切位移增加逐步达到极限值,之后,剪切应力保持基本不变或出现软化现象;土体类型及法向应力大小对界面剪切力学行为具有较大的影响;粉细砂土-混凝土界面摩擦角与土体有效内摩擦角相近,存在泥皮时,界面摩擦角降低达40%,泥皮的润滑作用较大地削弱了界面的剪切性能;存在泥皮情况下,注浆后界面摩擦角较泥皮界面提高近1倍,水泥浆的注入不仅消除了泥皮产生的不利影响,也有利于进一步改善界面剪切性能,提高其抗剪强度;泥皮及注浆对界面剪切应力与剪切位移关系亦有较大的影响;界面剪切作用对土体具有一定的影响范围,并在接触界面附近土体中逐渐形成剪切破坏带,剪切过程中界面呈现出由剪切位移阶段逐步过渡至剪切滑移阶段;此外,在剪切过程中,不同界面类型的土体变形存在较大差异。

关键词: 超长灌注桩, 桩-土界面, 剪切界面, 剪切应力, 剪切位移

Abstract: A series of shear tests is carried out on the interfaces between concrete and silty clay, fine sand to study pile-soil interface shear behaviors of super-long bored pile using large-scale interfacial shear apparatus. Bentonite mudcake or bentonite mudcake and cement slurry are installed on the interfaces between fine sand and concrete to study the influence of mudcake and post grouting on the shear behavior of pile-soil interface. The results show that the shear stress increases nonlinearly with the increase of the shear displacement. After the shear stress reaches an ultimate value, the shear stress retains mainly a constant value or shows a softening tendency. The shear behaviors of the interface are significantly influenced by the soil type and the normal stress on the interface. The friction angle of interface between fine sand and concrete is close to the effective internal friction angle of the soil. The friction angle of the interface reduces 40% when the mudcake exists, showing that the lubrication action of the mudcake can greatly weaken the shear performance of interface. By grouting the cement slurry into the interface with mudcake, the friction angle of the interface increases nearly by one time that of the mudcake interface. It is shown that grouting not only can eliminate the adverse effects of mud cake, but also can further improve the shear properties of the interface. Furthermore, the relation between shear stress and shear deformation of the interface is closely related to mudcake and cement slurry. Due to the interface shear in the soils, a shear band is found to form gradually in soil near the interface. The phase of shear displacement gradually transforms into the phase of shear slipping during shear process. Moreover, there is great difference in the shear deformations of soils with different types of interface during shearing.

Key words: super-long bored pile, pile-soil interface, shear interface, shear stress, shear displacement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] 王忠凯, 徐光黎. 盾构掘进、离开施工阶段对地表变形的 影响范围及量化预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[2] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[3] 李洪江,童立元,刘松玉,包红燕,杨 涛, . 大直径超长灌注桩水平承载性能的参数敏感性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1825-1833.
[4] 周立朵,孔纲强,彭怀风,顾红伟,朱 希,. 倾斜荷载下群桩承载特性理论分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2647-2654.
[5] 周锦强,王树英,阳军生,傅金阳,. 基于Mindlin解分析隧道开挖对近邻桩基的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1075-1081.
[6] 李 赛,汪 优,秦志浩,刘建华,. 基于统计损伤本构模型的改进桩-土接触面模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1947-1955.
[7] 李永辉 ,王卫东 ,吴江斌,. 桩端后注浆超长灌注桩桩侧极限摩阻力计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 382-386.
[8] 胡永强 ,汤连生 ,李兆源,. 静压桩桩-土界面滑动摩擦机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1288-1294.
[9] 章 敏,王星华,杨光程,谢李钊. 循环荷载作用下单桩动力模型试验与桩−土界面特性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1037-1044.
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818-3824.
[11] 王江营,曹文贵,翟友成. 深海沉积物与履带相互作用试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 274-278.
[12] 唐志成 ,夏才初 ,黄继辉 ,宋英龙. 节理峰值后归一化位移软化模型[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2013-2016.
[13] 夏才初 ,唐志成 ,宋英龙 ,刘远明. 节理峰值剪切位移及其影响因素分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1654-1658.
[14] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991-2994.
[15] 刘 杰,何 杰,闵长青. 楔形桩与圆柱形桩复合地基承载性状对比研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2202-2206.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[3] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[4] 邓 琴,郭明伟,李春光,葛修润. 基于边界元法的边坡矢量和稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1971 -1976 .
[5] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[6] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[7] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[8] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,韦昌富,吴二林,陈 盼,田慧会. 含天然气水合物沉积物相平衡问题研究综述[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2287 -2294 .
[9] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .
[10] 王国粹,杨 敏. 砂土中水平受荷桩非线性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 261 -267 .