›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S1): 310-314.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S1.053

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖泊相软土真空堆载联合预压法的离心机试验研究

刘春原,朱 楠,赵献辉,王文静   

  1. 河北工业大学 土木工程学院,天津 300401
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-09 出版日期:2015-07-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 通讯作者: 朱楠,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程等方面的研究。E-mail:zhn307@163.com E-mail:cyliu@hebut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘春原,男,1957年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程等方面的教学和科研。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省交通运输厅科学技术项目计划(No.Y-2012004)

Centrifugal test study of vacuum combined with surcharge preloading of lacustrine soft soil

LIU Chun-yuan, ZHU Nan, ZHAO Xian-hui, WANG Wen-jing   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
  • Received:2015-03-09 Online:2015-07-11 Published:2018-06-14

摘要: 依托高速公路试验段真空堆载联合预压加固软土路基的现场试验,根据实际路基情况建立离心模型,对真空堆载联合预压加固湖泊相软土地基进行离心机试验,分析了在真空预压和堆载预压联合作用下软土路基的沉降规律,并将试验结果与现场监测结果进行对比,研究了两者沉降的关系。通过对比分析可知,采用真空堆载联合预压加固湖泊相软土路基,地基土在工期内的沉降占总沉降87%以上,加固效果明显;用该方法加固后软基的工后沉降发展缓慢,两年内工后沉降最多为2.5 cm,路堤断面沉降差不超过5 mm,不会影响公路正常使用;试验结果与现场实测值沉降趋势基本相同,但由于现场试验条件及离心试验误差影响,导致两者沉降值存在差异。

关键词: 真空堆载联合预压, 湖泊相软土, 软土地基, 离心机试验, 固结沉降

Abstract: Based on the field test of vacuum combined with surcharge preloading reinforced soft ground in highway test section, the centrifugal model is built to perform the centrifugal test on vacuum combined with surcharge preloading reinforced lacustrine soft soil. The settlement law of soft ground under the effect of vacuum combined with surcharge preloading is analyzed. The test settlement is compared with the measured settlement in order to study the settlement relationship between them. By the above analysis and comparison, the results show that the settlement of soft ground during construction is more than 87% of total settlement under the effect of vacuum combined with surcharge preloading, which is effective to reinforce lacustrine soft soil. Using the vacuum combined with surcharge preloading to reinforce soft ground, the settlement development of soft ground after construction is slow; the settlement value of soft ground after construction is no more than 2.5 cm in two years; and the settlement difference of embankment section is less than 5 mm. It is clear that the settlement of soft ground after construction will not affect the normal operation of highway. The settlement trends of centrifugal test and field test are basically similar; but the settlement values of them have differences due to the impacts of the condition of field test and the errors of centrifugal test.

Key words: vacuum combined with surcharge preloading, lacustrine soft soil, soft ground, centrifugal test, consolidation settlement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 张治国, 黄茂松, 杨 轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动 诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[2] 吴建涛, 叶 霄, 李国维, 蒋 超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[3] 汪益敏,闫 岑,于 恒,李 奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[4] 宗钟凌,鲁先龙,李青松,. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[5] 肖 忠,王 琰,王元战,刘 莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[6] 李洪江,童立元,刘松玉,顾明芬,陆湛秋,. 软土地基刚柔性桩水平承载位移控制标准研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2676-2682.
[7] 王 禹,高广运,顾晓强,宋 健,. 渗透系数对砂土液化震陷影响的数值研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1813-1818.
[8] 焉 振,王元战,. 考虑软基不排水强度循环弱化的格型钢板桩防波堤动力有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1454-1462.
[9] 肖 忠,葛博睿,王元战,王 琰, . 十字形内隔板对桶形基础各单向承载力和破坏模式的影响分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3136-3144.
[10] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[11] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[12] 周小文,陈凌伟,程展林,汪明元,. 软基路堤施工稳定性控制标准研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2631-2635.
[13] 汪明武,赵奎元,朱其坤,徐新宇. 可液化场地微型桩地震响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1543-1549.
[14] 黄广军. Asaoka法预测软土地基沉降时存在的问题和对策[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1061-1065.
[15] 朱 斌,冯凌云,柴能斌,郭小青, . 软土地基上海堤变形与失稳的离心模型试验与数值分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3317-3323.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] 师旭超,韩 阳. 卸荷作用下软黏土回弹吸水试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 732 -736 .
[3] 朱建明,彭新坡,姚仰平,徐金海. SMP准则在计算煤柱极限强度中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2987 -2990 .
[4] 原喜忠,李 宁,赵秀云,杨银涛. 东北多年冻土地区地基承载力对气候变化敏感性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[5] 白 冰,李小春,石 露,唐礼忠. 弹塑性应力-应变曲线的斜率恒等式及其验证和应用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3789 -3792 .
[6] 唐利民. 地基沉降预测模型的正则化算法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[7] 李占海,朱万成,冯夏庭,李绍军,周 辉,陈炳瑞. 侧压力系数对马蹄形隧道损伤破坏的影响研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 434 -441 .
[8] 蔡辉腾,危福泉,蔡宗文. 重庆主城区粉质黏土动力特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[9] 宋 玲 ,刘奉银 ,李 宁 . 旋压入土式静力触探机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .
[10] 金解放 ,李夕兵 ,殷志强 ,邹 洋. 循环冲击下波阻抗定义岩石损伤变量的研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1385 -1393 .