›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 2151-2158.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.08.004

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于孔壁应变发展规律的压裂孔三阶段起裂特征试验研究

马衍坤1, 2,刘泽功1,周 健1,王维德1   

  1. 1.安徽理工大学 煤矿安全高效开采省部共建教育部重点实验室,安徽 淮南 232001; 2.河南理工大学 河南省瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理重点实验室—省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,河南 焦作 454000
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-19 出版日期:2015-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:马衍坤,男,1985年生,博士后,主要从事矿井瓦斯防治、安全科学等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金资助(No. 2013M541815);国家自然基金(No. 51404009,No. 51174002);河南省瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理重点实验室——省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地开放基金(No. WS2013A02)。

Study of tri-stage fracturing characteristic of borehole based on strain of hole-wall in hydraulic fracturing process

MA Yan-kun1, 2, LIU Ze-gong1, ZHOU Jian1, WANG Wei-de1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Safety and High-Efficiency Coal Mining of Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
  • Received:2014-08-19 Online:2015-08-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 利用自行研制的煤岩体水力压裂试验系统,开展了配比型煤与原煤水力压裂试验,测试并分析了水力压裂过程中压裂孔孔壁应变-水压曲线,并基于孔壁应变的发展规律,分析了压裂孔的三阶段起裂特征。结果表明,在压裂孔起裂过程中,钻孔孔壁呈现拉伸与压缩应变两种类型,并呈现拉伸破裂区与压缩变形区,其中压缩型应变具有较好的可恢复性,其应变恢复比远大于拉伸型应变;钻孔起裂过程分为3个阶段,即水气作用诱导微损伤形成阶段,孔壁内形成气流通道并产生初始损伤;局部损伤带形成阶段,孔壁形成拉伸破裂区和压缩变形区;试件失稳破坏阶段,裂缝不断延伸直至试件破裂,拉伸破裂区依然保持拉伸变形并较好地保持残余变形,而压缩变形区则由于作用力转向而得到一定程度恢复。研究成果对于揭示钻孔起裂行为及能量的演化规律具有重要理论意义。

关键词: 水力压裂, 孔壁应变, 残余变形, 三阶段起裂特征

Abstract: Experiments are conducted on raw coal and reshaped coal samples at varied conditions using a self-developed hydraulic fracturing experimental equipment. The characteristic of strain of borehole wall is analyzed. The results show that the strain of borehole is obvious during the process of increasing water pressure, and the strain is difficult to be recovered while the water pressure is unloaded. There are two types of strains in the borehole, i.e. tensile strain and the compressive strain. There are two types of strain region during the hydraulic fracturing process. The compressive strain occurred in compression region is recovered sufficiently when the water pressure is unloaded. The hydraulic fracturing process is divided into three stages by strain curves, i.e. the water and gas induced micro-damage stage, the local damaged zones stage, and the unstable failure stage. At micro-damage stage, the initial damage stage is caused by the formation of gas stream channels within the borehole wall. At the next stages, the tensile and compressive regions are generated on the borehole wall. The tensile failure zone increases continually until the collapse of the borehole, while the compressive deformation zone has been recovered to some extent due to the rotational direction of the applied force. Therefore, the residual tensile strain is obvious when the borehole has fractured, but the residual compressive strain is unapparent. The study results are of interest in the field of crack initiation and energy evolution mechanism of borehole.

Key words: hydraulic fracturing, strain of hole-wall, residual strain, characteristic of tri-stage hydraulic fracture

中图分类号: 

  • TD 315
[1] 武晋文, 冯子军, 梁栋, 鲍先凯, . 单轴应力下带钻孔花岗岩注入高温蒸汽 破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2637-2644.
[2] 张钰彬, 黄丹. 页岩水力压裂过程的态型近场动力学模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2873-2881.
[3] 张 帆, 马 耕, 冯 丹, . 大尺寸真三轴煤岩水力压裂模拟试验 与裂缝扩展分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1890-1897.
[4] 徐辰宇, 白 冰, 刘明泽, . 注CO2条件下花岗岩破裂特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1474-1482.
[5] 李 栋, 卢义玉, 荣 耀, 周东平, 郭臣业, 张尚斌, 张承客, . 基于定向水力压裂增透的大断面瓦斯 隧道快速揭煤技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 363-369.
[6] 梁天成,刘云志,付海峰,严玉忠,修乃岭,王 臻. 多级循环泵注水力压裂模拟实验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 355-361.
[7] 李 帅,朱万成,牛雷雷,李如飞,李少华. 动态扰动对应力松弛岩石变形行为影响的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2795-2804.
[8] 段敏克,蒋长宝,俞 欢,陆天宇,钮彬炜,孙东玲,. 分级加-卸载条件下原煤的渗透及能耗特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1346-1354.
[9] 赵 凯,周建军,孙 田,刘德洋,. 考虑排水条件和粗料含量的砂砾石土动残余变形特性[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 926-932.
[10] 程 万, 蒋国盛, 周治东, 魏子俊, 张 宇, 王炳红, 赵 林, . 水平井中多条裂缝同步扩展时裂缝竞争机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4448-4456.
[11] 姜婷婷,张建华,黄 刚, . 煤岩水力压裂裂缝扩展形态试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3677-3684.
[12] 刘汉龙,刘 平,杨 贵,肖 杨,刘彦辰,. 高聚物胶凝堆石料动残余变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1863-1868.
[13] 严成增. 模拟水压致裂的另一种二维FDEM-flow方法[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1789-1796.
[14] 陈江湛,曹 函,孙平贺,吴晶晶, . 三轴加载下煤岩脉冲水力压裂扩缝机制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1023-1031.
[15] 马 耕,张 帆,刘 晓,冯 丹,张鹏伟,. 地应力对破裂压力和水力裂缝影响的试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 216-222.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 孙德安,陈 波. 重塑超固结上海软土力学特性及弹塑性模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1739 -1743 .
[3] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[4] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] 雷金波,陈从新. 基于双曲线模型的带帽刚性桩复合地基荷载传递机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3385 -3391 .
[6] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[7] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[8] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[9] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .
[10] 唐世斌,唐春安,李连崇,张永彬. 湿度扩散诱发的隧洞时效变形数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 697 -0703 .