塑料套管管侧前注浆桩承载特性的现场试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2015.08.034

›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 2377-2385.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.08.034

塑料套管管侧前注浆桩承载特性的现场试验研究

齐昌广¹，刘干斌¹，陈永辉²，郭卫³

1.宁波大学建筑工程与环境学院建筑学系，浙江宁波 315211；2.河海大学岩土工程科学研究所，江苏南京 210098； 3.长江水利委员会水文局，湖北武汉 430000

收稿日期:2014-08-28 出版日期:2015-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
作者简介:齐昌广，男，1986年生，博士，讲师，主要从事地基处理、基础工程和岩土物理模拟试验等方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金青年基金项目（No. LQ15E080002）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（No. 51478228）。

Field testing on the bearing characteristics of plastic tube cast-in-place concrete pile with shaft pre-grouting

QI Chang-guang¹, LIU Gan-bin¹, CHEN Yong-hui², GUO Wei³

1. Faculty of Architectural, Civil Engineering and Environment, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. Bureau of Hydrology, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan, Hubei 430000, China

Received:2014-08-28 Online:2015-08-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高塑料套管混凝土桩（简称TC桩）的承载性能，结合桩侧注浆技术，发展和形成了塑料套管管侧前注浆桩（简称TCSG桩）。通过现场试验，对TCSG桩、TC桩和扩径塑料套管混凝土桩（简称TCLD桩）3种桩型在不同时期进行了静载试验，并引入了3种易于应用的单桩沉降计算模型对各桩体的沉降进行了计算。试验结果和沉降模型计算分析表明：与TC桩相比，TCSG桩增加了8.3%～20.0%的承载力，并减小了19.8%～33.5%的沉降，而TCLD桩降低了10.0%～16.7%的承载力，且增加了13.2%～43.8%桩体的沉降；TCSG桩的轴力衰减速率大于TC和扩径的TCLD桩的，TCSG桩的前、后期的平均轴力衰减速率相差不大，TC桩后期的平均轴力衰减速率相比前期提高了1.1%～14.2%，而TCLD桩却降低了5.9%～21.9%；在前、后期静载时，TCSG桩在各级荷载下的平均单位侧摩阻力相比TC桩分别提高了14.5%～39.6%和9.2%～28.6%，扩径后的TCLD桩则分别降低了4.9%～11.8%和11.5%～30.7%；管侧前注浆后的TCSG桩的时效特性不显著，扩径后的TCLD桩的侧摩阻力随时间减小而端阻力则增大；基于桩土荷载传递的单桩沉降计算模型能够较好地预测塑料套管桩的沉降。

关键词: 塑料套管管侧前注浆桩, 前注浆, 承载特性, 时间效应, 单桩沉降计算模型

Abstract: To enhance the bearing capacity of plastic tube cast-in-place concrete pile (TC pile), the plastic tube cast-in-place concrete pile with shaft pre-grouting (TCSG pile) was developed in combination with the technology of shaft grouting. The in-situ static load tests were carried out on the TCSG pile, TC pile, and plastic tube cast-in-place concrete pile with large diameter (TCLD pile) installed in different times. Meanwhile, three kinds of calculation models of single pile settlement were introduced to predict the piles settlement. The testing and calculating results indicate that the bearing capacity of TCSG pile is raised by 8.3%-20.0% with a settlement decreased by 19.8%-33.5%; while the bearing capacity of TCLD pile is reduced by 10.0%-16.7% with a settlement increased by 13.2%-43.8%; compared with TC pile; the ratio of axial force attenuation of TCSG pile is greater than that of TC pile or TCLD pile; the difference is trivial between the average ratios of axial force attenuation for TCSG pile respectively obtained in earlier and later static load tests; the average ratio of axial force attenuation of TC pile gained in the later static load test is increased by 1.1%-14.2% compared with that in earlier static load test; while a reduction of 5.9%-21.9% in the average ratio of axial force attenuation is found in TCLD pile; the average skin frictions of TCSG pile under each loading level, compared with TC pile, increase by 14.5%-39.6% and 9.2%-28.6% during the earlier and later static load tests, respectively; while those of TCLD pile decrease by 4.9%-11.8% and 11.5%-30.7% due to enlarging the diameter of TCLD pile; the increasing of bearing capacity of TCSG pile with time is insignificant; the skin friction of TCLD pile diminishes with time elapsing; in contrast, the end resistance of TCLD pile increases; the calculation model of single pile settlement based on the pile-soil load transfer can well predict the settlement of a single plastic tube pile.

Key words: plastic tube cast-in-place concrete pile with shaft pre-grouting, pre-grouting, bearing characteristics, time effect, calculation model of single pile settlement

中图分类号:

TU 473

齐昌广，刘干斌，陈永辉，郭卫，. 塑料套管管侧前注浆桩承载特性的现场试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2377-2385.

QI Chang-guang , LIU Gan-bin , CHEN Yong-hui , GUO Wei，. Field testing on the bearing characteristics of plastic tube cast-in-place concrete pile with shaft pre-grouting [J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2377-2385.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[2]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[3]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[4]	雷华阳, 刘广学, 周骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[5]	王忠瑾, 方鹏飞, 谢新宇, 王奎华, 王文军, 李金柱, . 带肋竹节桩竖向抗压承载力影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 381-388.
[6]	许宏发，柏准，齐亮亮，耿汉生，马林建，刘斌, . 基于全应力-应变曲线的软岩蠕变寿命估计[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1973-1980.
[7]	熊勇，罗强，张良，蒋良潍，朱江江, . 粉质黏土填料在K30试验加载进程中的变形时间效应状态分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 863-871.
[8]	王家全，张亮亮，刘政权，周圆兀. 土工格栅加筋砂土地基大模型动载试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3539-3547.
[9]	肖忠，王琰，王元战，刘莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[10]	裴书锋，冯夏庭，张建聪，王鹏飞，江权，周扬一，郝宪杰，刘俊峰，. 高边坡坝基柱状节理玄武岩开挖卸荷时效松弛特性[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3743-3754.
[11]	邓琴，汤华，吴振君，尹小涛，袁从华,. 隧道锚–围岩系统承载特性的室内模型试验及畸变纠正[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 247-254.
[12]	徐江，龚维明，张琦，戴国亮，霍少磊，杨超, . 大口径钢管斜桩竖向承载特性数值模拟与现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2434-2440.
[13]	王家全，刘垒雷，朱庆盛，张昊,. 红黏土地层静压闭口管桩残余应力模型试验分析[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1878-1886.
[14]	李永辉，朱翔，周同和,. 桩端后注浆对大直径灌注桩影响的现场对比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 388-396.
[15]	崔强，周亚辉，童瑞铭，吉晔. 上拔扩底基础与地基土体承载特性差异性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 476-482.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

塑料套管管侧前注浆桩承载特性的现场试验研究

Field testing on the bearing characteristics of plastic tube cast-in-place concrete pile with shaft pre-grouting

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10