›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S2): 37-46.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S2.005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

堆积层滑坡水动力位移耦合预测参数及其评价方法研究

贺可强1,杨德兵1,郭 璐1,李 晶2   

  1. 1. 青岛理工大学 地质环境与效应工程技术研究中心,山东 青岛 266033; 2. 中国石油天然气华东勘察设计研究院 岩土工程处,山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-26 出版日期:2015-08-31 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 作者简介:贺可强,男,1960年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质灾害预测、评价与防治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41372297);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(No.20113721110002)。

Prediction parameter of water dynamics coupled with displacement and evaluation method of debris landslide

HE Ke-qiang1, YANG De-bing1, GUO Lu1, LI Jing2   

  1. 1. Engineering Technique Research Center of Geo-Environment and Impact ,Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao, Shandong 266033, China; 2. Geotechnical Engineering Office, China National Petroleum Investigation and Design and Survey Institute in East China, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China
  • Received:2014-06-26 Online:2015-08-31 Published:2018-06-14

摘要: 在系统分析滑坡的物质组成和失稳动因的基础上,分析和研究了地下水在滑坡稳定性演化过程中的卸载与加载动力作用及其位移响应规律和特点。从非线性系统动力学角度,提出了运用地下水卸加载动力与位移响应耦合预测参数来评价边坡稳定性演化规律与失稳特征,即以地下水位变化量作为堆积层滑坡的卸加载动力参数,以相应的位移作为其卸加载响应参数,建立和确定了地下水卸加载动力与位移响应比预测参数与评价模型。同时,运用损伤力学基本原理,建立了其卸加载响应比与坡体损伤变量和稳定性系数的定量关系以及失稳判据。以三峡库区典型堆积层滑坡分析为例,运用地下水动力与位移耦合预测模型对其稳定性进行了分析与评价,发现地下水动力位移耦合预测参数变化与边坡稳定性实际动态演化规律基本吻合。研究成果表明,所确定的参数是水诱发型堆积层滑坡的一种有效位移动力评价参数,可运用该参数对该类滑坡的动态稳定性进行实时监测预警与评价。

关键词: 堆积层滑坡, 水动力位移耦合预测参数, 卸加载响应比, 新滩滑坡

Abstract: On the basis of systematic analysis of the material composition and destabilized mechanism of debris landslide induced by water,the dynamic action of unloading and loading and its response law of groundwater in the process of the dynamic stability evolution of the slope are systematically analyzed. The unloading-loading response ratio parameter to evaluate the laws of the dynamic stability of the landslide evolution and destabilized features are analyzed and put forward from the viewpoint of the nonlinear system dynamics. This paper firstly proposes that the monthly change of groundwater table can be taken as the unloading- loading parameter of debris landslide and its displacement velocity and acceleration rate can be taken as the response parameter to unloading-loading are proposed. Thus, the dynamic displacement parameters and dynamic prediction model of the unloading-loading response ratio of the groundwater table are determined. Meanwhile, the quantitative relationship between unloading-loading response ratio and damage variable & the stability coefficient and the criterion of displacement response ratio to unloading-loading are determined by using the theory of damage mechanics and the damage variable parameters of slope. Finally, taking the typical debris landslide of the Three Gorges Reservoir region—Xintan landslide for example, the calculation of unloading-loading response ratio of monitoring points of Xintan landslide is completed by using the dynamic displacement prediction models of the groundwater. The computed results show that the curves of unloading-loading response ratio of monitoring points basically agree with the dynamic evolution law of the slope stability. The results of the study show that the parameter proposed in this paper is a kind of effective dynamics appraisal parameter of displacement in the stability of landslides induced by water and it can be used to make real-time monitoring warning and evaluation on the dynamic stability of this kind of landslides.

Key words: debris landslide, water dynamics displacement prediction parameter, unloading-loading response ratio, Xintan landslide

中图分类号: 

  • O 302
[1] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[2] 马显春, 罗 刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[3] 贺可强,郭 栋,张 朋,郭 璐,张国栋,. 降雨型滑坡垂直位移方向率及其位移监测预警判据研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3649-3659.
[4] 王维早 ,许 强 ,郑 光 ,李嘉雨 ,罗博宇,. 强降雨诱发缓倾堆积层边坡失稳离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 87-95.
[5] 吴火珍,冯美果,焦玉勇,李海波. 降雨条件下堆积层滑坡体滑动机制分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 324-329.
[6] 姜 彤,王 伟,崔江利,陈贤挺. 滑坡临滑预报的态矢量方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1747-1752.
[7] 贺可强, 李相然, 孙林娜, 王思敬, . 水诱发堆积层滑坡位移动力学参数及其在稳定性评价中的应用 ——以三峡库区黄腊石滑坡分析为例[J]. , 2008, 29(11): 2983-2989.
[8] 陈善雄 ,许锡昌 ,徐海滨,. 降雨型堆积层滑坡特征及稳定性分析[J]. , 2005, 26(S2): 6-10.
[9] 贺可强 ,白建业 ,王思敬,. 降雨诱发型堆积层滑坡的位移动力学特征分析[J]. , 2005, 26(5): 705-709.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[5] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[6] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[7] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[8] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[9] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[10] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .