汶川地震公路隧道普通段震害分析及震害机制研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S2.062

›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S2): 439-446.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S2.062

汶川地震公路隧道普通段震害分析及震害机制研究

崔光耀¹，刘维东¹，倪嵩陟¹，王明年²，林国进³

1. 北方工业大学土木工程学院，北京 100144；2. 西南交通大学土木工程学院，四川成都 610031； 3. 四川省交通厅公路规划勘察设计研究院，四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2014-12-09 出版日期:2015-08-31 发布日期:2018-06-14
作者简介:崔光耀，男，1983年生，博士，讲师，主要从事隧道与地下工程的教学与研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No.51408008，No.41172250）；国家十二五科技支撑项目（No.2012BAK09B06）；西部交通建设科技项目（No..200831800026, No.200831800098）；北方工业大学青年拔尖人才培育计划（No.XN131）。

Analysis of seismic damage and mechanism of general section of highway tunnel in Wenchuan earthquake

CUI Guang-yao¹, LIU Wei-dong¹, NI Song-zhi¹, WANG Ming-nian², LIN Guo-jin³

1. School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. Highway Planning, Survey, Design and Research Institute, Sichuan Provincial Communications Department, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Received:2014-12-09 Online:2015-08-31 Published:2018-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在汶川地震中隧道普通段出现了严重的震害，为了提高高烈度地震区隧道普通段的抗震性能，通过统计分析汶川地震公路隧道普通段震害调查资料，对隧道普通段进行了震害分析。结果表明，隧道普通段震害主要发生在软岩均一段、软硬围岩交接段软岩部分以及围岩缺陷段。通过三维有限差分数值模拟和现场典型震害分析，研究了公路隧道普通段的震害机制，探明了围岩均一普通段隧道震害机制，即硬岩隧道普通段基本无震害，软岩隧道普通段震害较严重，衬砌结构受地震惯性力影响较大，强制位移次之；探明了围岩软硬交接普通段隧道震害机制，即震害主要发生在软硬围岩交接段软岩部分，震害的主要影响因素为强制位移，地震惯性力次之；探明了围岩缺陷普通段隧道震害机制，即震害主要由地震惯性力造成强制位移影响很小。研究成果可为高烈度地震区公路隧道普通段的抗震设防提供参考。

关键词: 公路隧道, 普通段, 震害分析, 震害机制

Abstract: For the tunnel general sections, seismic damage types appeared in Wenchuan earthquake. In order to improve aseismatic performance of tunnel general sections in high intensity earthquake area, by analyzing the seismic survey data of general sections of highway tunnel in Wenchuan earthquake, seismic damage analysis is concluded. The results show that the seismic damages of tunnel general sections occurred mainly in the soft rock of uniform section, the soft rock part of soft and hard surrounding rock and the defect section. Through three-dimensional finite difference numerical simulation and analysis of typical field damage, seismic damage mechanism of highway tunnel general section is studied. The seismic damage mechanism of surrounding rock uniform general section is understood; namely there is almost no seismic damage in the hard rock tunnel general section damage, while the seismic damage is more serious in the soft rock tunnel general section; lining structure is greatly influenced by the seismic inertia force, and forced displacement comes second. The seismic damage mechanism of the soft and hard surrounding rock general section is revealed, that is, the seismic damage occurs mainly in the soft rock part of soft and hard surrounding rock; the main influence factor is the forced displacement, closely followed by seismic inertia force. The seismic damage mechanism of the defect of general section is disclosed, namely the seismic damage is mainly caused by the seismic inertia force, and forced displacement has little effect. These research results can provide reference for the seismic fortification of highway tunnel general section in high intensity earthquake area.

Key words: highway tunnel, general section, seismic damage analysis, seismic damage mechanism

中图分类号:

U 452

崔光耀，刘维东，倪嵩陟，王明年，林国进,. 汶川地震公路隧道普通段震害分析及震害机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 439-446.

CUI Guang-yao , LIU Wei-dong , NI Song-zhi , WANG Ming-nian , LIN Guo-jin,. Analysis of seismic damage and mechanism of general section of highway tunnel in Wenchuan earthquake [J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 439-446.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	崔戈，方勇，徐晨，范建国. 公路隧道下穿3层采空区施工模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 257-266.
[2]	陈云娟，李术才，朱维申，王文，王旌. 非连续变形岩石断裂分析中的一种全长剪切锚杆[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 293-297.
[3]	汪波，何川，吴德兴，耿萍. 苍岭特长公路隧道地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 628-634.
[4]	徐帮树，杨为民，王者超，王育奎. 公路隧道型钢喷射混凝土初期支护安全评价研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 248-254.
[5]	文竞舟，张永兴　，王成　. 基于接触应力反分析的隧道初期支护结构内力研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2467-2472.
[6]	王明年，陈炜韬，刘大刚，童建军. 公路隧道岩质和土质围岩统一亚级分级标准研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 547-552.
[7]	尹蓉蓉，朱合华. 氯盐和冻融循环复合作用对深埋公路隧道安全性能的影响[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 323-327.
[8]	王唢，赵明阶，蒋树屏，易丽云，林志. 隧道开挖中围岩损伤演化分析及力学参数预测[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 195-200.
[9]	马亢，徐进，张志龙，王兰生，李朝政. 雪峰山公路隧道的超前预测预报研究[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1381-1386.
[10]	马亢，徐进，吴赛钢，张爱辉. 公路隧道局部塌方洞段的围岩稳定性评价[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2955-2960.
[11]	曲海锋，朱合华，蔡永昌 . 曲率半径对临时支护及核心土的受力影响分析[J]. , 2008, 29(7): 1778-1782.
[12]	曲海锋，朱合华，蔡永昌 . 扁平大跨度公路隧道松动荷载计算方法探讨[J]. , 2008, 29(4): 989-994.
[13]	叶飞，丁文其，王国波，王士民 . 列车移动荷载对下穿公路隧道稳定性影响研究[J]. , 2008, 29(2): 549-552.
[14]	丁浩，蒋树屏，杨林德 . 外水压下隧道衬砌的力学响应及结构对策研究[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2799-2804.
[15]	庄海洋，程绍革，陈国兴 . 阪神地震中大开地铁车站震害机制数值仿真分析[J]. , 2008, 29(1): 245-250.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

汶川地震公路隧道普通段震害分析及震害机制研究

Analysis of seismic damage and mechanism of general section of highway tunnel in Wenchuan earthquake

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10