›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 3063-3070.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.11.004

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同平衡堆载条件下桩基承载特性的原位试验研究

邓会元,戴国亮,龚维明,朱中发   

  1. 1. 东南大学 混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京210096;2. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210096
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-18 出版日期:2015-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 通讯作者: 戴国亮,男,1975年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: seudaigl@126.com E-mail:973730609@qq.com
  • 作者简介:邓会元,男,1989年生,博士生,主要从事岩土工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51478109);国家“973”计划(No.2013CB036304);国家863计划资助项目(No.2012AA112501);浙江省交通运输厅科研计划项目(No.2014H10)。

In situ experimental study of bearing characteristics of pile foundation under different balanced surcharges

DENG Hui-yuan, DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, ZHU Zhong-fa   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China
  • Received:2015-07-18 Online:2015-11-11 Published:2018-06-14
  • Supported by:

    Project supported by the National Natural Science Fund Project (No.51478109), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No.2013CB036304), the National 863 Plan (No.2012AA112501) and the Scientific Research Projects of Zhejiang Province Transportation Hall (No.2014H10).

摘要: 沿海吹填围垦地区土质较差,淤泥软弱土层较厚,在后期填土作用下土体会产生很大的固结沉降。后期不同堆载填土方式对桥梁基础影响较大,可降低基桩承载力,同时平衡堆载主要增加基桩的沉降,而不平衡堆载则对基桩水平位移影响较大。结合台州湾大桥工程建设,选取3根基桩进行了平衡堆载(围载)试验,另外,选取了3根基桩进行了不平衡堆载试验,研究不同堆载条件下对桩基承载特性的影响。现场试验结果表明,平衡堆载条件下主要引起桩侧产生负摩阻力,堆载高度达到4 m,堆载面积为24 m×16 m时,负摩阻力总和达到2 687 kN左右,中性点深度约为29.5 m,约为0.36倍桩长,且负摩阻力的发展是随时间而变化的;不平衡堆载条件下主要产生土拱效应,使桩基产生较大的水平位移,试验中不平衡堆载对吹填区的影响主要在距离地面20 m范围之内,土中最大水平位移出现在距离地面4~5 m左右位置,而桩身最大水平位移出现在桩顶。

关键词: 桥梁基桩, 不平衡堆载, 平衡堆载, 负摩阻力, 土拱效应

Abstract: The soil in the coastal reclamation area is generally very poor, embedded with thick soft oozy soil layers. The soil can produce great consolidation settlement under the effect of late filling. Different types of surcharges have an important effect on the bridge pile foundation, and reduce the bearing capacity of pile. Balanced surcharge and unbalanced surcharge mainly affect the settlement and the horizontal displacement of pile, respectively. Combined with the Taizhou Bay bridge project construction, three piles are selected to conduct balanced surcharge loading test, and another three piles are designed to conduct unbalanced surcharge loading test to study the bearing characteristics of pile foundation under different balance surcharges. The field test results show that the negative friction of pile side is caused mainly by balanced surcharge. When the surcharge load is up to 4 m and area is 24 m×16 m, the total negative frictional resistance is up to around 2 687 kN, and the depth of neutral point is about 29.5 m, nearly being 0.36 times the pile length. The development of negative frictional resistance changes with time. The unbalanced surcharge load mainly affects the pile foundation to produce soil arching effect, and gives rises to a large horizontal displacement of pile. In the unbalanced surcharge loading test, the surcharge mainly affects the area in the range of 20 m from the ground, the maximum horizontal displacement in soil appears around 4 to 5 m off the ground, and the maximum horizontal displacement of pile appears at the top of the pile.

Key words: bridge pile foundation, unbalanced surcharge, balanced surcharge load, negative frictional resistance, soil arching effect

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1+6
[1] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[2] 叶观宝, 郑文强, 张 振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[3] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[4] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[5] 陈 峥, 何 平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[6] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[7] 尹志强,佘成学,姚海林,卢 正,骆行文,. 考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
[8] 赖丰文,陈福全,万梁龙,. 考虑不完全土拱效应的浅层地基竖向应力计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.
[9] 徐长节,梁禄钜,陈其志,刘元昆,. 考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1927-1934.
[10] 姜文雨, 刘 一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[11] 马学宁,付 江,王 军,王 旭,. 不同堆载形式对群桩负摩阻力的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3531-3538.
[12] 杨 贵,王阳阳,刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[13] 李瑞林,周国庆,林 超,赵光思,陈国舟,. 考虑土拱效应的滑移面间非极限状态土压力解答[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3145-3153.
[14] 孙潇昊,缪林昌,林海山. 不同埋深砂土盾构隧道掘进开挖面前方土拱效应研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2980-2988.
[15] 朱冰儿,齐昌广,鲍娇蕾. 路堤荷载下塑料套管桩荷载传递机制的现场试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 658-664.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535 -540 .
[2] 李荣涛. 一种高温下混凝土化学塑性-损伤耦合本构模型[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1585 -1591 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[6] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[7] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[8] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[9] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .