›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3556-3566.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.12.028

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于修正D-S证据理论的锚杆承载力预测方法研究

孙晓云,张 涛,王明明,邢 卉   

  1. 石家庄铁道大学 电气与电子工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-07 出版日期:2015-12-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 作者简介:孙晓云,女,1971年生,博士,教授,主要从事于矿山安全监测方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51274144);河北省自然科学基金资助(No. E2014210075);中国博士后科学基金项目资助(No. 2013T60197)

A method for predicting bearing capacity of anchor bolt based on modified D-S evidence theory

SUN Xiao-yun, ZHANG Tao, WANG Ming-ming, XING Hui   

  1. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2015-05-07 Online:2015-12-11 Published:2018-06-14
  • Supported by:

    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51274144), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant No. E2014210075) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2013T60197).

摘要: 锚杆极限承载力的准确预测是承载力预测中最重要的部分。传统的方法经常借助于拉拔试验中锚杆系统处于弹塑性阶段的试验数据进行预测,但实际上弹性和弹塑性阶段区分得不太明显,且实际锚杆荷载-位移(P-S)曲线形状多种多样,故使用单一预测模型不能够对锚杆极限承载力破坏值进行准确预测。针对预测锚杆极限承载力破坏值属于不确定问题,引入组合模型思想,借助被广泛使用在多传感器信息融合中的Dempster-Shafer(简称D-S)证据理论融合算法来建立组合预测模型。该方法是将互不相容的基本命题(假定)组成的完备集合表示对某一问题的所有可能答案,并为各命题分配信任程度,使用D-S合并规则计算同一命题下各个证据体共同作用产生的反映融合信息的新证据体的信任程度,分析各命题产生新证据体的信任程度来确定“不确定问题”的答案。通过减少弹性阶段数据使每个参加组合的预测模型产生多个预测值,将每个预测值都视为一个证据体,在同一鉴别框架下,把同类型、不同特征的证据体按照D-S合并规则合并成一个新的证据体,再根据决策规则得到最终的判定结果。将D-S方法与直接求取算术平均值的方法进行对比,结果表明:使用D-S方法得到的预测值较准确;由于预测值受给定初值影响较大,故对原有预测方法进行修正,修正后预测方法的预测效果更好,预测精度更高,适用范围更广。该研究成果可用于矿山、地下工程等施工过程,以及后续质量检测、稳定性评价、岩体强度预测等方面。

关键词: 极限承载力, P-S曲线, Dempster-Shafer证据理论, 预测

Abstract: Predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of anchor bolt is the most important part in the bearing capacity prediction of the anchor bolt. In traditional methods, the elastoplastic stage experimental data are usually from pull-out tests on anchor bolts used to predict bearing capacity. However, in practice, it is not easy to discriminate the elastic stage from elastoplastic stage, and additionally the actual P-S curves usually have various shapes. Thus, the single model is difficult to accurately predict all kinds of anchor bolts ultimate bearing capacity. Since the prediction of ultimate bearing capacity belongs to an uncertain problem, a combined forecasting model is developed with the Dempster-Shafer(D-S) evidence theory fusion algorithm that is widely used in the multi-sensor information fusion. The D-S theory is an efficient method to process uncertain incomplete and vague information in data fusion. The aim of the management of uncertainty in a system is to reach the best approximation. The D-S algorithm firstly employs a complete set consisting incompatible basic hypothesis to represent all possibilities, and assigns the basic possibility of confidence. Then, the D-S combination rules is applied to calculate the confidence of the new evidence body reflecting the combination of information produced by the same proposition with various evidence. Finally, the best approximation of the "uncertainty" will be determined by analyzing the confidence of new evidence body generated by each proposition. This paper, by reducing the elastic phase data, enables each prediction model participating in combination generate many predicted values, and then supposes each predicted value as an evidence, with the same identification framework. Moreover, it combines the evidence with the same type but different characteristics into a new evidence accordance with the D-S combination rules, and obtains the final prediction results according to the decision rules. Comparing the D-S method with traditional arithmetic mean method, the results show that the prediction accuracy using the D-S method is more accurate. As the prediction values are easily influenced by the given initial value, the modified prediction method in this paper shows that the modified method has higher precision. The results can be used for mine construction, underground construction, subsequent quality testing, stability evaluation and rock strength prediction.

Key words: ultimate bearing capacity, P-S curve, Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, prediction

中图分类号: 

  • TD 353+.6,TU 457
[1] 王忠凯, 徐光黎. 盾构掘进、离开施工阶段对地表变形的 影响范围及量化预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[2] 程爱平, 张玉山, 戴顺意, 董福松, 曾文旭, 李丹峰, . 单轴压缩胶结充填体声发射参数 时空演化规律及破裂预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2965-2974.
[3] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[4] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[5] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 刘娜, 胡明, . 海量监测数据下分布式BP神经网络区域 滑坡空间预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2866-2872.
[6] 王 岗, 潘一山, 肖晓春, . 单轴加载煤体破坏特征与电荷规律研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1823-1831.
[7] 张 勋, 黄茂松, 胡志平, . 砂土中单桩水平循环累积变形特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 933-941.
[8] 郑 栋, 黄劲松, 李典庆, . 基于多源信息融合的路堤沉降预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 709-719.
[9] 钟国强, 王 浩, 李 莉, 王成汤, 谢壁婷, . 基于SFLA-GRNN模型的基坑地表最大沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 792-798.
[10] 王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[11] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[12] 钟祖良, 别聪颖, 范一飞, 刘新荣, 罗亦琦, 涂义亮, . 土石混合体注浆扩散机制及影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4194-4202.
[13] 刘勇, 胡宝丹, 陈喆. 滑坡监测点多信息相似性度量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4001-4010.
[14] 黄建, 姚仰平. 高填方边坡失稳时间预测的实用模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4057-4064.
[15] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[2] 李 晶,缪林昌,钟建驰,冯兆祥. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[3] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[4] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[5] 孔祥兴,夏才初,仇玉良,张丽英,龚建伍. 平行小净距盾构与CRD法黄土地铁隧道施工力学研究[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 516 -524 .
[6] 江学良 ,杨 慧 ,曹 平. 基于SURPAC模型的采空区与露采边坡相互影响的FLAC3D分析[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1234 -1240 .
[7] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[8] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[9] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[10] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .