›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 147-155.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.01.018

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多重响应面法的空间变异土坡系统可靠度分析

李静萍1, 2,程勇刚1, 2,李典庆1, 2,常晓林1, 2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-26 出版日期:2016-01-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 程勇刚,男,1977年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事水工结构、岩土工程数值方法等方面的研究工作。E-mail: chengyg@whu.edu.cn E-mail:sherry_ljp@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李静萍,女,1991年生,硕士研究生,主要从事水工结构、岩土工程数值方法等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助(No.51109169);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题(No.20110141120019);国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No.51225903)。

System reliability analysis of spatially variable soil slopes using the multiple response surfaces method

LI Jing-ping1, 2, CHENG Yong-gang1, 2, LI Dian-qing1, 2, CHANG Xiao-lin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2015-05-26 Online:2016-01-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51109169), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20110141120019) and National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (51225903).

摘要: 空间变异土坡可靠度问题应该视为系统可靠度问题,多重响应面法为高效、准确地对其进行求解提供了一条有效途径。针对单一滑面确定了合理的空间变异土坡安全系数的响应面形式,并探讨了可靠度分析精度和随机场离散精度间的近似线性关系。建立基于大量潜在滑面的多重响应面,计算系统失效概率,并识别其中的代表性滑面。通过两个土坡算例验证所提方法的有效性。结果表明:随着空间变异性的增强,土坡可靠度的系统性增强,单一滑面的失效概率将显著低估土坡整体失效概率;通过控制随机场离散精度,可以事先保证一定的可靠度分析精度,从而有效地避免离散出过多并不重要的随机变量;合理地选择多重响应面形式有利于进一步提高计算效率和计算精度;多重响应面法可以同时分析所有潜在滑面的失效概率以及系统失效概率,并识别出代表性滑面,为边坡防治提供参考。

关键词: 边坡, 系统可靠度, 空间变异性, 多重响应面法(MRSM), 代表性滑面

Abstract: The reliability analysis of a spatially variable soil slope should be considered as a system reliability problem. The multiple response surfaces method (MRSM) provides a rational vehicle to evaluate it efficiently and accurately. This study firstly determines the reasonable response surface function for safety factor with considering spatial variability based on single slip surface. Then the approximate linear relationship between the accuracy of reliability analysis and that of random field discretization is explored. Using the MRSM on a large amount of potential slip surfaces, several representative slip surfaces (RSSs) are identified with the assessment of slope system reliability. The proposed method is illustrated and verified using two spatially variable soil slopes. The results indicate that as the spatial variability becomes stronger, the slope reliability becomes more systematic, and the failure probability obtained using single slip surface significantly underestimates the system failure probability. It is possible to ensure the accuracy of reliability analysis by predefining a proper value of the accuracy of random field discretization, aiming at reducing the number of unimportant random variables. In addition, choosing a proper response surface function helps improve both efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method. In addition, MRSM can simultaneously calculate the failure probability of all potential slip surfaces and the system failure probability, and identify RSSs, providing a guidance to make slope remedy measure.

Key words: slope, system reliability, spatial variability, multiple response surfaces method (MRSM), representative slip surfaces

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43

[1] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[2] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[3] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[4] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[5] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[6] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[7] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[8] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[9] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[10] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[11] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[14] 姜谙男, 张权, 吴洪涛, 段龙梅, 焦明伟, 白涛, . 基于改进局部安全度的爆破作用边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!