›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 323-330.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.003

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

变荷载下不排水桩复合地基桩间土和下卧层土固结分析

杨 涛1,杨 欢1,阮一舟1,李国维2   

  1. 1.上海理工大学 土木系,上海 200093;2.河海大学 道路与铁道工程研究所,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-24 出版日期:2016-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:杨涛,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事软土地基加固和复合地基理论研究
  • 基金资助:

    广东省交通运输厅交通科技项目(No. 2011-02-021)。

Consolidation analysis of surrounding and underlying soils in a composite ground with impervious pile under variable loading

YANG Tao1, YANG Huan1, RUAN Yi-zhou1, LI Guo-wei2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. Highway and Railway Engineering Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2014-11-24 Online:2016-02-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Transportation Science and Technology Funding of the Department of Transport of Guangdong Province(2011-02-021).

摘要: 基于悬浮不排水桩复合地基超静孔隙水压力解答,建立了变荷载条件下复合地基桩间土和下卧层土平均固结度的解析解。通过与有限元解答的对比,证明了解析解的正确性和有效性。利用解析解对桩间土和下卧层土的固结性状进行了分析。研究发现,桩间土的固结速率远大于下卧层土,并随置换率和桩土模量比的增加而增大。在工程设计采用的置换率范围内,桩的贯入比较小时,下卧层土的固结速率受置换率和桩土模量比的影响很小;桩的贯入比较大时,下卧层土的固结速率随置换率和桩土模量比的增加而增大。桩间土和下卧层土的固结存在临界置换率和临界桩土模量比,超过临界值后,桩间土和下卧层土的固结速率不随桩土模量比和置换率的增加而增大。桩间土和下卧层土的固结速率随加荷速率的增加而增大。

关键词: 不排水桩, 复合地基, 固结, 桩间土, 下卧层土

Abstract: By the analytical solution of the average excess pore water pressures in a composite ground with a floating impervious pile, an analytical solution is obtained for the consolidation of surrounding and underlying soils under variable loading. The validity of the proposed solution is illustrated by comparing the present solutions to the FEM results. The consolidation behavior of the surrounding and underlying soils is investigated using the current solutions. The results indicate that the consolidation rate of the surrounding soil is considerably larger than that of the underlying soil, and it increases with the increase of area replacement ratio and constrained modulus ratio of a pile to surrounding soil. The consolidation rate of the underlying soil is hardly influenced by the constrained modulus ratio and area replacement ratio when the area replacement ratio is located within the range recommended in engineering design, and penetration ratio of a pile is not large enough. The consolidation rate increases with the increase of the constrained modulus and area replacement ratios. There exist some critical values of the constrained modulus ratio and area replacement ratio, beyond which consolidation rates of the surrounding and underlying soils are insensitive to the variations of these two parameters. The consolidation rates of the surrounding and the underlying soils always increase with the increase of loading rate.

Key words: impervious pile, composite ground, consolidation, surrounding soil, underlying soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[2] 孙德安, 薛垚, 汪磊, . 变荷载作用下考虑半透水边界热传导性的 一维饱和土热固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1465-1473.
[3] 李红坡, 梅国雄, 肖涛, 陈征. 涂抹区重叠竖井地基固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1560-1566.
[4] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[5] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[6] 师旭超, 孙运德. 线性卸荷作用下软土超孔隙水压力 变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[7] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[8] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[9] 郎瑞卿, 杨爱武, 闫澍旺, . 修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
[10] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[11] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[12] 蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[13] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[14] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[15] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!